Role of image guided radiation therapy in obese patients with gynecologic malignancies

Tracy S. Bray, Adelaide Kaczynski, Kevin Albuquerque, Francesca Cozzi, John C. Roeske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the effect of body mass index on setup errors by analyzing daily shifts required in treating patients undergoing image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for gynecologic malignancies. Methods and Materials: Forty successive patients treated with daily kV-based IGRT for gynecologic malignancies between April 2009 and June 2012 were identified. Directional setup corrections were analyzed according to patient body mass index. Random and systematic setup errors were calculated. Image acquisition dose was estimated by performing ionization chamber measurements in a phantom. Results: Obese patients had larger random setup errors, particularly in the right-left (R-L) direction, with a setup error of 7.6 mm, versus 3.9 mm for nonobese patients. The range of individual patient random errors in the R-L direction was 1.5 to 7.6 mm among nonobese patients versus 2.0 to 17.0 mm among obese patients (P = .03, F-test). For obese patients, daily IGRT prevented treating outside the planning target volume in 33% of fractions, versus 16% in the nonobese group (P = .001). The mean total image acquisition dose from daily kV-IGRT was approximately 3 cGy, versus 150 cGy if daily megavoltage portal imaging were used to correct for erratic setup errors. Conclusions: Daily kV-based IGRT in obese patients allows for correction of erratic setup error and minimizes excess dose from portal imaging.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)249-255
Number of pages7
JournalPractical Radiation Oncology
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Image-Guided Radiotherapy
Neoplasms
Body Mass Index

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Role of image guided radiation therapy in obese patients with gynecologic malignancies. / Bray, Tracy S.; Kaczynski, Adelaide; Albuquerque, Kevin; Cozzi, Francesca; Roeske, John C.

In: Practical Radiation Oncology, Vol. 3, No. 4, 10.2013, p. 249-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bray, Tracy S. ; Kaczynski, Adelaide ; Albuquerque, Kevin ; Cozzi, Francesca ; Roeske, John C. / Role of image guided radiation therapy in obese patients with gynecologic malignancies. In: Practical Radiation Oncology. 2013 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 249-255.
@article{4426f8f43b4c4163a898c121823e88ee,
title = "Role of image guided radiation therapy in obese patients with gynecologic malignancies",
abstract = "Purpose: We investigated the effect of body mass index on setup errors by analyzing daily shifts required in treating patients undergoing image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for gynecologic malignancies. Methods and Materials: Forty successive patients treated with daily kV-based IGRT for gynecologic malignancies between April 2009 and June 2012 were identified. Directional setup corrections were analyzed according to patient body mass index. Random and systematic setup errors were calculated. Image acquisition dose was estimated by performing ionization chamber measurements in a phantom. Results: Obese patients had larger random setup errors, particularly in the right-left (R-L) direction, with a setup error of 7.6 mm, versus 3.9 mm for nonobese patients. The range of individual patient random errors in the R-L direction was 1.5 to 7.6 mm among nonobese patients versus 2.0 to 17.0 mm among obese patients (P = .03, F-test). For obese patients, daily IGRT prevented treating outside the planning target volume in 33{\%} of fractions, versus 16{\%} in the nonobese group (P = .001). The mean total image acquisition dose from daily kV-IGRT was approximately 3 cGy, versus 150 cGy if daily megavoltage portal imaging were used to correct for erratic setup errors. Conclusions: Daily kV-based IGRT in obese patients allows for correction of erratic setup error and minimizes excess dose from portal imaging.",
author = "Bray, {Tracy S.} and Adelaide Kaczynski and Kevin Albuquerque and Francesca Cozzi and Roeske, {John C.}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "249--255",
journal = "Practical Radiation Oncology",
issn = "1879-8500",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Role of image guided radiation therapy in obese patients with gynecologic malignancies

AU - Bray, Tracy S.

AU - Kaczynski, Adelaide

AU - Albuquerque, Kevin

AU - Cozzi, Francesca

AU - Roeske, John C.

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Purpose: We investigated the effect of body mass index on setup errors by analyzing daily shifts required in treating patients undergoing image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for gynecologic malignancies. Methods and Materials: Forty successive patients treated with daily kV-based IGRT for gynecologic malignancies between April 2009 and June 2012 were identified. Directional setup corrections were analyzed according to patient body mass index. Random and systematic setup errors were calculated. Image acquisition dose was estimated by performing ionization chamber measurements in a phantom. Results: Obese patients had larger random setup errors, particularly in the right-left (R-L) direction, with a setup error of 7.6 mm, versus 3.9 mm for nonobese patients. The range of individual patient random errors in the R-L direction was 1.5 to 7.6 mm among nonobese patients versus 2.0 to 17.0 mm among obese patients (P = .03, F-test). For obese patients, daily IGRT prevented treating outside the planning target volume in 33% of fractions, versus 16% in the nonobese group (P = .001). The mean total image acquisition dose from daily kV-IGRT was approximately 3 cGy, versus 150 cGy if daily megavoltage portal imaging were used to correct for erratic setup errors. Conclusions: Daily kV-based IGRT in obese patients allows for correction of erratic setup error and minimizes excess dose from portal imaging.

AB - Purpose: We investigated the effect of body mass index on setup errors by analyzing daily shifts required in treating patients undergoing image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for gynecologic malignancies. Methods and Materials: Forty successive patients treated with daily kV-based IGRT for gynecologic malignancies between April 2009 and June 2012 were identified. Directional setup corrections were analyzed according to patient body mass index. Random and systematic setup errors were calculated. Image acquisition dose was estimated by performing ionization chamber measurements in a phantom. Results: Obese patients had larger random setup errors, particularly in the right-left (R-L) direction, with a setup error of 7.6 mm, versus 3.9 mm for nonobese patients. The range of individual patient random errors in the R-L direction was 1.5 to 7.6 mm among nonobese patients versus 2.0 to 17.0 mm among obese patients (P = .03, F-test). For obese patients, daily IGRT prevented treating outside the planning target volume in 33% of fractions, versus 16% in the nonobese group (P = .001). The mean total image acquisition dose from daily kV-IGRT was approximately 3 cGy, versus 150 cGy if daily megavoltage portal imaging were used to correct for erratic setup errors. Conclusions: Daily kV-based IGRT in obese patients allows for correction of erratic setup error and minimizes excess dose from portal imaging.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884349595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884349595&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.prro.2012.09.001

M3 - Article

C2 - 24674394

AN - SCOPUS:84884349595

VL - 3

SP - 249

EP - 255

JO - Practical Radiation Oncology

JF - Practical Radiation Oncology

SN - 1879-8500

IS - 4

ER -