TY - JOUR
T1 - Role of quality assessment in improving red blood cell transfusion practice
AU - Joshi, G.
AU - McCarroll, M.
AU - O'Rourke, P.
AU - Coffey, F.
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - A prospective analysis of perioperative red blood cell transfusion practice in 110 patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty was conducted as a part of a quality assessment programme at the National Orthopaedic Hospital. In addition to demographic and clinical data, blood loss and perioperative transfusions were also recorded. Blood was collected for evaluation of haematocrit levels at predetermined intervals (preoperative and 6 h, 1, 2, 3, 7 days, postoperatively). Blood transfused with the patient's haematocrit of more than 30 per cent was considered inappropriate. In addition, a discharge haematocrit exceeding 36 per cent was chosen to identify overtransfusion. Eighty-four per cent were transfused a total of 191 units of homologous blood. Only 4 units were transfused between 3 patients, intraoperatively. All intraoperative transfusions were appropriate. Using the preset-criteria (i.e. blood transfused with haematocrit of more than 30 per cent), 36 per cent of total units transfused were inappropriate. Using the criterion of discharge haematocrit of more than 36 per cent, 24 per cent of the patients were overtransfused. As compared to a previous retrospective analysis of blood transfusion in the same patient population which showed that inappropriate transfusion occurred in 45 per cent of the patients, the results from this study suggest a trend towards a more conservative transfusion practice. The improvement in transfusion practice may be due to the ongoing quality assurance programme and the use of transfusion guidelines.
AB - A prospective analysis of perioperative red blood cell transfusion practice in 110 patients undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty was conducted as a part of a quality assessment programme at the National Orthopaedic Hospital. In addition to demographic and clinical data, blood loss and perioperative transfusions were also recorded. Blood was collected for evaluation of haematocrit levels at predetermined intervals (preoperative and 6 h, 1, 2, 3, 7 days, postoperatively). Blood transfused with the patient's haematocrit of more than 30 per cent was considered inappropriate. In addition, a discharge haematocrit exceeding 36 per cent was chosen to identify overtransfusion. Eighty-four per cent were transfused a total of 191 units of homologous blood. Only 4 units were transfused between 3 patients, intraoperatively. All intraoperative transfusions were appropriate. Using the preset-criteria (i.e. blood transfused with haematocrit of more than 30 per cent), 36 per cent of total units transfused were inappropriate. Using the criterion of discharge haematocrit of more than 36 per cent, 24 per cent of the patients were overtransfused. As compared to a previous retrospective analysis of blood transfusion in the same patient population which showed that inappropriate transfusion occurred in 45 per cent of the patients, the results from this study suggest a trend towards a more conservative transfusion practice. The improvement in transfusion practice may be due to the ongoing quality assurance programme and the use of transfusion guidelines.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031044943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031044943&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/BF02939769
DO - 10.1007/BF02939769
M3 - Article
C2 - 9057425
AN - SCOPUS:0031044943
SN - 0332-1029
VL - 166
SP - 16
EP - 19
JO - The Dublin Journal of Medical and Chemical Science
JF - The Dublin Journal of Medical and Chemical Science
IS - 1
ER -