Safe practices for copy and paste in the EHR: Systematic review, recommendations, and novel model for Health IT collaboration

Amy Y. Tsou, Christoph U. Lehmann, Jeremy Michel, Ronni Solomon, Lorraine Possanza, Tejal Gandhi

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Copy and paste functionality can support efficiency during clinical documentation, but may promote inaccurate documentation with risks for patient safety. The Partnership for Health IT Patient Safety was formed to gather data, conduct analysis, educate, and disseminate safe practices for safer care using health information technology (IT). Objective: To characterize copy and paste events in clinical care, identify safety risks, describe existing evidence, and develop implementable practice recommendations for safe reuse of information via copy and paste. Methods: The Partnership 1) reviewed 12 reported safety events, 2) solicited expert input, and 3) performed a systematic literature review (2010 to January 2015) to identify publications addressing frequency, perceptions/attitudes, patient safety risks, existing guidance, and potential interventions and mitigation practices. Results: The literature review identified 51 publications that were included. Overall, 66% to 90% of clinicians routinely use copy and paste. One study of diagnostic errors found that copy and paste led to 2.6% of errors in which a missed diagnosis required patients to seek additional unplanned care. Copy and paste can promote note bloat, internal inconsistencies, error propagation, and documentation in the wrong patient chart. Existing guidance identified specific responsibilities for authors, organizations, and electronic health record (EHR) developers. Analysis of 12 reported copy and paste safety events was congruent with problems identified from the literature review. Conclusion: Despite regular copy and paste use, evidence regarding direct risk to patient safety remains sparse, with significant study limitations. Drawing on existing evidence, the Partnership developed four safe practice recommendations: 1) Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily identifiable; 2) Ensure the provenance of copy and paste material is readily available; 3) Ensure adequate staff training and education; 4) Ensure copy and paste practices are regularly monitored, measured, and assessed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-34
Number of pages23
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Medical Informatics
Electronic Health Records
Ointments
Information technology
Health
Patient Safety
Documentation
Safety
Publications
Health care
Education
Diagnostic Errors

Keywords

  • Clinical documentation
  • Copy and paste
  • Electronic health records
  • Health policy
  • Information technology
  • Patient safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Safe practices for copy and paste in the EHR : Systematic review, recommendations, and novel model for Health IT collaboration. / Tsou, Amy Y.; Lehmann, Christoph U.; Michel, Jeremy; Solomon, Ronni; Possanza, Lorraine; Gandhi, Tejal.

In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 8, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 12-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Tsou, Amy Y. ; Lehmann, Christoph U. ; Michel, Jeremy ; Solomon, Ronni ; Possanza, Lorraine ; Gandhi, Tejal. / Safe practices for copy and paste in the EHR : Systematic review, recommendations, and novel model for Health IT collaboration. In: Applied Clinical Informatics. 2017 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 12-34.
@article{3e5536d3d23447549453b3bb9dbcca2a,
title = "Safe practices for copy and paste in the EHR: Systematic review, recommendations, and novel model for Health IT collaboration",
abstract = "Background: Copy and paste functionality can support efficiency during clinical documentation, but may promote inaccurate documentation with risks for patient safety. The Partnership for Health IT Patient Safety was formed to gather data, conduct analysis, educate, and disseminate safe practices for safer care using health information technology (IT). Objective: To characterize copy and paste events in clinical care, identify safety risks, describe existing evidence, and develop implementable practice recommendations for safe reuse of information via copy and paste. Methods: The Partnership 1) reviewed 12 reported safety events, 2) solicited expert input, and 3) performed a systematic literature review (2010 to January 2015) to identify publications addressing frequency, perceptions/attitudes, patient safety risks, existing guidance, and potential interventions and mitigation practices. Results: The literature review identified 51 publications that were included. Overall, 66{\%} to 90{\%} of clinicians routinely use copy and paste. One study of diagnostic errors found that copy and paste led to 2.6{\%} of errors in which a missed diagnosis required patients to seek additional unplanned care. Copy and paste can promote note bloat, internal inconsistencies, error propagation, and documentation in the wrong patient chart. Existing guidance identified specific responsibilities for authors, organizations, and electronic health record (EHR) developers. Analysis of 12 reported copy and paste safety events was congruent with problems identified from the literature review. Conclusion: Despite regular copy and paste use, evidence regarding direct risk to patient safety remains sparse, with significant study limitations. Drawing on existing evidence, the Partnership developed four safe practice recommendations: 1) Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily identifiable; 2) Ensure the provenance of copy and paste material is readily available; 3) Ensure adequate staff training and education; 4) Ensure copy and paste practices are regularly monitored, measured, and assessed.",
keywords = "Clinical documentation, Copy and paste, Electronic health records, Health policy, Information technology, Patient safety",
author = "Tsou, {Amy Y.} and Lehmann, {Christoph U.} and Jeremy Michel and Ronni Solomon and Lorraine Possanza and Tejal Gandhi",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4338/ACI-2016-09-R-0150",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "12--34",
journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
issn = "1869-0327",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safe practices for copy and paste in the EHR

T2 - Systematic review, recommendations, and novel model for Health IT collaboration

AU - Tsou, Amy Y.

AU - Lehmann, Christoph U.

AU - Michel, Jeremy

AU - Solomon, Ronni

AU - Possanza, Lorraine

AU - Gandhi, Tejal

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Background: Copy and paste functionality can support efficiency during clinical documentation, but may promote inaccurate documentation with risks for patient safety. The Partnership for Health IT Patient Safety was formed to gather data, conduct analysis, educate, and disseminate safe practices for safer care using health information technology (IT). Objective: To characterize copy and paste events in clinical care, identify safety risks, describe existing evidence, and develop implementable practice recommendations for safe reuse of information via copy and paste. Methods: The Partnership 1) reviewed 12 reported safety events, 2) solicited expert input, and 3) performed a systematic literature review (2010 to January 2015) to identify publications addressing frequency, perceptions/attitudes, patient safety risks, existing guidance, and potential interventions and mitigation practices. Results: The literature review identified 51 publications that were included. Overall, 66% to 90% of clinicians routinely use copy and paste. One study of diagnostic errors found that copy and paste led to 2.6% of errors in which a missed diagnosis required patients to seek additional unplanned care. Copy and paste can promote note bloat, internal inconsistencies, error propagation, and documentation in the wrong patient chart. Existing guidance identified specific responsibilities for authors, organizations, and electronic health record (EHR) developers. Analysis of 12 reported copy and paste safety events was congruent with problems identified from the literature review. Conclusion: Despite regular copy and paste use, evidence regarding direct risk to patient safety remains sparse, with significant study limitations. Drawing on existing evidence, the Partnership developed four safe practice recommendations: 1) Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily identifiable; 2) Ensure the provenance of copy and paste material is readily available; 3) Ensure adequate staff training and education; 4) Ensure copy and paste practices are regularly monitored, measured, and assessed.

AB - Background: Copy and paste functionality can support efficiency during clinical documentation, but may promote inaccurate documentation with risks for patient safety. The Partnership for Health IT Patient Safety was formed to gather data, conduct analysis, educate, and disseminate safe practices for safer care using health information technology (IT). Objective: To characterize copy and paste events in clinical care, identify safety risks, describe existing evidence, and develop implementable practice recommendations for safe reuse of information via copy and paste. Methods: The Partnership 1) reviewed 12 reported safety events, 2) solicited expert input, and 3) performed a systematic literature review (2010 to January 2015) to identify publications addressing frequency, perceptions/attitudes, patient safety risks, existing guidance, and potential interventions and mitigation practices. Results: The literature review identified 51 publications that were included. Overall, 66% to 90% of clinicians routinely use copy and paste. One study of diagnostic errors found that copy and paste led to 2.6% of errors in which a missed diagnosis required patients to seek additional unplanned care. Copy and paste can promote note bloat, internal inconsistencies, error propagation, and documentation in the wrong patient chart. Existing guidance identified specific responsibilities for authors, organizations, and electronic health record (EHR) developers. Analysis of 12 reported copy and paste safety events was congruent with problems identified from the literature review. Conclusion: Despite regular copy and paste use, evidence regarding direct risk to patient safety remains sparse, with significant study limitations. Drawing on existing evidence, the Partnership developed four safe practice recommendations: 1) Provide a mechanism to make copy and paste material easily identifiable; 2) Ensure the provenance of copy and paste material is readily available; 3) Ensure adequate staff training and education; 4) Ensure copy and paste practices are regularly monitored, measured, and assessed.

KW - Clinical documentation

KW - Copy and paste

KW - Electronic health records

KW - Health policy

KW - Information technology

KW - Patient safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009801546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009801546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-R-0150

DO - 10.4338/ACI-2016-09-R-0150

M3 - Review article

C2 - 28074211

AN - SCOPUS:85009801546

VL - 8

SP - 12

EP - 34

JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

SN - 1869-0327

IS - 1

ER -