Sample size and power analysis for stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

In stepped wedge cluster randomised trials (SW-CRTs), clusters of subjects are randomly assigned to sequences, where they receive a specific order of treatments. Compared to conventional cluster randomised studies, one unique feature of SW-CRTs is that all clusters start from control and gradually transition to intervention according to the randomly assigned sequences. This feature mitigates the ethical concern of withholding an effective treatment and reduces the logistic burden of implementing the intervention at multiple clusters simultaneously. This feature, however, presents challenges that need to be addressed in experimental design and data analysis, i.e., missing data due to prolonged follow-up and complicated correlation structures that involve between-subject and longitudinal correlations. In this study, based on the generalised estimating equation (GEE) approach, we present a closed-form sample size formula for SW-CRTs with a binary outcome, which offers great flexibility to account for unbalanced randomisation, missing data, and arbitrary correlation structures. We also present a correction approach to address the issue of under-estimated variance by GEE estimator when the sample size is small. Simulation studies and application to a real clinical trial are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)162-169
Number of pages8
JournalStatistical Theory and Related Fields
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • GEE
  • Stepped wedge
  • clinical trials
  • power analysis
  • sample size

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analysis
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Applied Mathematics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sample size and power analysis for stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this