Scoring of coronary artery calcium scans: History, assumptions, current limitations, and future directions

Krishna Alluri, Parag H. Joshi, Travis S. Henry, Roger S. Blumenthal, Khurram Nasir, Michael J. Blaha

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

52 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is a reliable, noninvasive technique for estimating overall coronary plaque burden and for identifying risk for future cardiac events. Arthur Agatston and Warren Janowitz published the first technique for scoring CAC scans in 1990. Given the lack of available data correlating CAC with burden of coronary atherosclerosis at that time, their scoring algorithm was remarkable, but somewhat arbitrary. Since then, a few other scoring techniques have been proposed for the measurement of CAC including the Volume score and Mass score. Yet despite new data, little in this field has changed in the last 15 years. The main focus of our paper is to review the implications of the current approach to scoring CAC scans in terms of correlation with the central disease - coronary atherosclerosis. We first discuss the methodology of each available scoring system, describing how each of these scores make important indirect assumptions in the way they account (or do not account) for calcium density, location of calcium, spatial distribution of calcium, and microcalcification/emerging calcium that might limit their predictive power. These assumptions require further study in well-designed, large event-driven studies. In general, all of these scores are adequate and are highly correlated with each other. Despite its age, the Agatston score remains the most extensively studied and widely accepted technique in both the clinical and research settings. After discussing CAC scoring in the era of contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography, we discuss suggested potential modifications to current CAC scanning protocols with respect to tube voltage, tube current, and slice thickness which may further improve the value of CAC scoring. We close with a focused discussion of the most important future directions in the field of CAC scoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)109-117
Number of pages9
JournalAtherosclerosis
Volume239
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Coronary Vessels
History
Calcium
Direction compound
Coronary Artery Disease
Calcinosis
Coronary Angiography

Keywords

  • Agatston score
  • Coronary artery calcium
  • EBCT
  • Mass score
  • MDCT
  • Volume score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Scoring of coronary artery calcium scans : History, assumptions, current limitations, and future directions. / Alluri, Krishna; Joshi, Parag H.; Henry, Travis S.; Blumenthal, Roger S.; Nasir, Khurram; Blaha, Michael J.

In: Atherosclerosis, Vol. 239, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 109-117.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Alluri, Krishna ; Joshi, Parag H. ; Henry, Travis S. ; Blumenthal, Roger S. ; Nasir, Khurram ; Blaha, Michael J. / Scoring of coronary artery calcium scans : History, assumptions, current limitations, and future directions. In: Atherosclerosis. 2015 ; Vol. 239, No. 1. pp. 109-117.
@article{29b6f9980fba4f50aa4400281a51d97b,
title = "Scoring of coronary artery calcium scans: History, assumptions, current limitations, and future directions",
abstract = "Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is a reliable, noninvasive technique for estimating overall coronary plaque burden and for identifying risk for future cardiac events. Arthur Agatston and Warren Janowitz published the first technique for scoring CAC scans in 1990. Given the lack of available data correlating CAC with burden of coronary atherosclerosis at that time, their scoring algorithm was remarkable, but somewhat arbitrary. Since then, a few other scoring techniques have been proposed for the measurement of CAC including the Volume score and Mass score. Yet despite new data, little in this field has changed in the last 15 years. The main focus of our paper is to review the implications of the current approach to scoring CAC scans in terms of correlation with the central disease - coronary atherosclerosis. We first discuss the methodology of each available scoring system, describing how each of these scores make important indirect assumptions in the way they account (or do not account) for calcium density, location of calcium, spatial distribution of calcium, and microcalcification/emerging calcium that might limit their predictive power. These assumptions require further study in well-designed, large event-driven studies. In general, all of these scores are adequate and are highly correlated with each other. Despite its age, the Agatston score remains the most extensively studied and widely accepted technique in both the clinical and research settings. After discussing CAC scoring in the era of contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography, we discuss suggested potential modifications to current CAC scanning protocols with respect to tube voltage, tube current, and slice thickness which may further improve the value of CAC scoring. We close with a focused discussion of the most important future directions in the field of CAC scoring.",
keywords = "Agatston score, Coronary artery calcium, EBCT, Mass score, MDCT, Volume score",
author = "Krishna Alluri and Joshi, {Parag H.} and Henry, {Travis S.} and Blumenthal, {Roger S.} and Khurram Nasir and Blaha, {Michael J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "239",
pages = "109--117",
journal = "Atherosclerosis",
issn = "0021-9150",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scoring of coronary artery calcium scans

T2 - History, assumptions, current limitations, and future directions

AU - Alluri, Krishna

AU - Joshi, Parag H.

AU - Henry, Travis S.

AU - Blumenthal, Roger S.

AU - Nasir, Khurram

AU - Blaha, Michael J.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is a reliable, noninvasive technique for estimating overall coronary plaque burden and for identifying risk for future cardiac events. Arthur Agatston and Warren Janowitz published the first technique for scoring CAC scans in 1990. Given the lack of available data correlating CAC with burden of coronary atherosclerosis at that time, their scoring algorithm was remarkable, but somewhat arbitrary. Since then, a few other scoring techniques have been proposed for the measurement of CAC including the Volume score and Mass score. Yet despite new data, little in this field has changed in the last 15 years. The main focus of our paper is to review the implications of the current approach to scoring CAC scans in terms of correlation with the central disease - coronary atherosclerosis. We first discuss the methodology of each available scoring system, describing how each of these scores make important indirect assumptions in the way they account (or do not account) for calcium density, location of calcium, spatial distribution of calcium, and microcalcification/emerging calcium that might limit their predictive power. These assumptions require further study in well-designed, large event-driven studies. In general, all of these scores are adequate and are highly correlated with each other. Despite its age, the Agatston score remains the most extensively studied and widely accepted technique in both the clinical and research settings. After discussing CAC scoring in the era of contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography, we discuss suggested potential modifications to current CAC scanning protocols with respect to tube voltage, tube current, and slice thickness which may further improve the value of CAC scoring. We close with a focused discussion of the most important future directions in the field of CAC scoring.

AB - Coronary artery calcium (CAC) scanning is a reliable, noninvasive technique for estimating overall coronary plaque burden and for identifying risk for future cardiac events. Arthur Agatston and Warren Janowitz published the first technique for scoring CAC scans in 1990. Given the lack of available data correlating CAC with burden of coronary atherosclerosis at that time, their scoring algorithm was remarkable, but somewhat arbitrary. Since then, a few other scoring techniques have been proposed for the measurement of CAC including the Volume score and Mass score. Yet despite new data, little in this field has changed in the last 15 years. The main focus of our paper is to review the implications of the current approach to scoring CAC scans in terms of correlation with the central disease - coronary atherosclerosis. We first discuss the methodology of each available scoring system, describing how each of these scores make important indirect assumptions in the way they account (or do not account) for calcium density, location of calcium, spatial distribution of calcium, and microcalcification/emerging calcium that might limit their predictive power. These assumptions require further study in well-designed, large event-driven studies. In general, all of these scores are adequate and are highly correlated with each other. Despite its age, the Agatston score remains the most extensively studied and widely accepted technique in both the clinical and research settings. After discussing CAC scoring in the era of contrast enhanced coronary CT angiography, we discuss suggested potential modifications to current CAC scanning protocols with respect to tube voltage, tube current, and slice thickness which may further improve the value of CAC scoring. We close with a focused discussion of the most important future directions in the field of CAC scoring.

KW - Agatston score

KW - Coronary artery calcium

KW - EBCT

KW - Mass score

KW - MDCT

KW - Volume score

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920896602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920896602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.040

DO - 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.12.040

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25585030

AN - SCOPUS:84920896602

VL - 239

SP - 109

EP - 117

JO - Atherosclerosis

JF - Atherosclerosis

SN - 0021-9150

IS - 1

ER -