Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force

Hubert Labelle, Stephens B. Richards, Marinus De Kleuver, Theodoros B. Grivas, Keith D K Luk, Hee K. Wong, John Thometz, Marie Beauséjour, Isabelle Turgeon, Daniel Y T Fong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Routine screening of scoliosis is a controversial subject and screening efforts vary greatly around the world.Methods: Consensus was sought among an international group of experts (seven spine surgeons and one clinical epidemiologist) using a modified Delphi approach. The consensus achieved was based on careful analysis of a recent critical review of the literature on scoliosis screening, performed using a conceptual framework of analysis focusing on five main dimensions: technical, clinical, program, cost and treatment effectiveness.Findings: A consensus was obtained in all five dimensions of analysis, resulting in 10 statements and recommendations. In summary, there is scientific evidence to support the value of scoliosis screening with respect to technical efficacy, clinical, program and treatment effectiveness, but there insufficient evidence to make a statement with respect to cost effectiveness. Scoliosis screening should be aimed at identifying suspected cases of scoliosis that will be referred for diagnostic evaluation and confirmed, or ruled out, with a clinically significant scoliosis. The scoliometer is currently the best tool available for scoliosis screening and there is moderate evidence to recommend referral with values between 5 degrees and 7 degrees. There is moderate evidence that scoliosis screening allows for detection and referral of patients at an earlier stage of the clinical course, and there is low evidence suggesting that scoliosis patients detected by screening are less likely to need surgery than those who did not have screening. There is strong evidence to support treatment by bracing.Interpretation: This information statement by an expert panel supports scoliosis screening in 4 of the 5 domains studied, using a framework of analysis which includes all of the World Health Organisation criteria for a valid screening procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number17
JournalScoliosis
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 31 2013

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Advisory Committees
Research
Program Evaluation
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Referral and Consultation
Spine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : An information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. / Labelle, Hubert; Richards, Stephens B.; De Kleuver, Marinus; Grivas, Theodoros B.; Luk, Keith D K; Wong, Hee K.; Thometz, John; Beauséjour, Marie; Turgeon, Isabelle; Fong, Daniel Y T.

In: Scoliosis, Vol. 8, No. 1, 17, 31.10.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Labelle, H, Richards, SB, De Kleuver, M, Grivas, TB, Luk, KDK, Wong, HK, Thometz, J, Beauséjour, M, Turgeon, I & Fong, DYT 2013, 'Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force', Scoliosis, vol. 8, no. 1, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-8-17
Labelle, Hubert ; Richards, Stephens B. ; De Kleuver, Marinus ; Grivas, Theodoros B. ; Luk, Keith D K ; Wong, Hee K. ; Thometz, John ; Beauséjour, Marie ; Turgeon, Isabelle ; Fong, Daniel Y T. / Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : An information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force. In: Scoliosis. 2013 ; Vol. 8, No. 1.
@article{fe01490eeff44e0a8c7a370c4f1189f9,
title = "Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: An information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force",
abstract = "Background: Routine screening of scoliosis is a controversial subject and screening efforts vary greatly around the world.Methods: Consensus was sought among an international group of experts (seven spine surgeons and one clinical epidemiologist) using a modified Delphi approach. The consensus achieved was based on careful analysis of a recent critical review of the literature on scoliosis screening, performed using a conceptual framework of analysis focusing on five main dimensions: technical, clinical, program, cost and treatment effectiveness.Findings: A consensus was obtained in all five dimensions of analysis, resulting in 10 statements and recommendations. In summary, there is scientific evidence to support the value of scoliosis screening with respect to technical efficacy, clinical, program and treatment effectiveness, but there insufficient evidence to make a statement with respect to cost effectiveness. Scoliosis screening should be aimed at identifying suspected cases of scoliosis that will be referred for diagnostic evaluation and confirmed, or ruled out, with a clinically significant scoliosis. The scoliometer is currently the best tool available for scoliosis screening and there is moderate evidence to recommend referral with values between 5 degrees and 7 degrees. There is moderate evidence that scoliosis screening allows for detection and referral of patients at an earlier stage of the clinical course, and there is low evidence suggesting that scoliosis patients detected by screening are less likely to need surgery than those who did not have screening. There is strong evidence to support treatment by bracing.Interpretation: This information statement by an expert panel supports scoliosis screening in 4 of the 5 domains studied, using a framework of analysis which includes all of the World Health Organisation criteria for a valid screening procedure.",
author = "Hubert Labelle and Richards, {Stephens B.} and {De Kleuver}, Marinus and Grivas, {Theodoros B.} and Luk, {Keith D K} and Wong, {Hee K.} and John Thometz and Marie Beaus{\'e}jour and Isabelle Turgeon and Fong, {Daniel Y T}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1186/1748-7161-8-17",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders",
issn = "1748-7161",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

T2 - An information statement by the scoliosis research society international task force

AU - Labelle, Hubert

AU - Richards, Stephens B.

AU - De Kleuver, Marinus

AU - Grivas, Theodoros B.

AU - Luk, Keith D K

AU - Wong, Hee K.

AU - Thometz, John

AU - Beauséjour, Marie

AU - Turgeon, Isabelle

AU - Fong, Daniel Y T

PY - 2013/10/31

Y1 - 2013/10/31

N2 - Background: Routine screening of scoliosis is a controversial subject and screening efforts vary greatly around the world.Methods: Consensus was sought among an international group of experts (seven spine surgeons and one clinical epidemiologist) using a modified Delphi approach. The consensus achieved was based on careful analysis of a recent critical review of the literature on scoliosis screening, performed using a conceptual framework of analysis focusing on five main dimensions: technical, clinical, program, cost and treatment effectiveness.Findings: A consensus was obtained in all five dimensions of analysis, resulting in 10 statements and recommendations. In summary, there is scientific evidence to support the value of scoliosis screening with respect to technical efficacy, clinical, program and treatment effectiveness, but there insufficient evidence to make a statement with respect to cost effectiveness. Scoliosis screening should be aimed at identifying suspected cases of scoliosis that will be referred for diagnostic evaluation and confirmed, or ruled out, with a clinically significant scoliosis. The scoliometer is currently the best tool available for scoliosis screening and there is moderate evidence to recommend referral with values between 5 degrees and 7 degrees. There is moderate evidence that scoliosis screening allows for detection and referral of patients at an earlier stage of the clinical course, and there is low evidence suggesting that scoliosis patients detected by screening are less likely to need surgery than those who did not have screening. There is strong evidence to support treatment by bracing.Interpretation: This information statement by an expert panel supports scoliosis screening in 4 of the 5 domains studied, using a framework of analysis which includes all of the World Health Organisation criteria for a valid screening procedure.

AB - Background: Routine screening of scoliosis is a controversial subject and screening efforts vary greatly around the world.Methods: Consensus was sought among an international group of experts (seven spine surgeons and one clinical epidemiologist) using a modified Delphi approach. The consensus achieved was based on careful analysis of a recent critical review of the literature on scoliosis screening, performed using a conceptual framework of analysis focusing on five main dimensions: technical, clinical, program, cost and treatment effectiveness.Findings: A consensus was obtained in all five dimensions of analysis, resulting in 10 statements and recommendations. In summary, there is scientific evidence to support the value of scoliosis screening with respect to technical efficacy, clinical, program and treatment effectiveness, but there insufficient evidence to make a statement with respect to cost effectiveness. Scoliosis screening should be aimed at identifying suspected cases of scoliosis that will be referred for diagnostic evaluation and confirmed, or ruled out, with a clinically significant scoliosis. The scoliometer is currently the best tool available for scoliosis screening and there is moderate evidence to recommend referral with values between 5 degrees and 7 degrees. There is moderate evidence that scoliosis screening allows for detection and referral of patients at an earlier stage of the clinical course, and there is low evidence suggesting that scoliosis patients detected by screening are less likely to need surgery than those who did not have screening. There is strong evidence to support treatment by bracing.Interpretation: This information statement by an expert panel supports scoliosis screening in 4 of the 5 domains studied, using a framework of analysis which includes all of the World Health Organisation criteria for a valid screening procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886743028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886743028&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1748-7161-8-17

DO - 10.1186/1748-7161-8-17

M3 - Article

C2 - 24171910

AN - SCOPUS:84886743028

VL - 8

JO - Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders

JF - Scoliosis and Spinal Disorders

SN - 1748-7161

IS - 1

M1 - 17

ER -