Secondary techniques in breast reconstruction refinement: The periareolar advancement flap

Georgette Oni, Michel Saint-Cyr, Munique Maia, Shannon Colohan, Rod J. Rohrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Techniques in breast reconstruction have vastly improved with natural feeling, aesthetically pleasing breasts created through transfer of free or pedicled tissue. Traditional flap designs incorporate a skin paddle that leaves a "patch," which can be fairly large on the nouveau breast, clearly delineating the boundaries between the reconstruction and the native skin. In this article, the authors discuss the operative technique and present a clinical series of patients undergoing the periareolar advancement flap procedure. This technique reduces the skin paddle either to a circumferential areola-size area onto which the nipple can be simultaneously reconstructed (type I) or a single linear scar (type II) across the breast mound, thus enhancing the aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast. MethodS: A retrospective review of all patients between 2007 and 2009 undergoing periareolar advancement flaps under the care of the senior author (M.S.C.) was performed. Type of reconstruction, staging of procedures, additional operations, and complications were recorded. Results: Fifteen patients had a type I procedure and six patients had a type II procedure. There were no major complications. One patient had minor nipple scabbing that resolved. All type I patients had concomitant nipple reconstructions at the time of their periareolar advancement flap. Conclusions: The periareolar advancement flap is a useful technique to include in the range of secondary revision procedures for further refinement of autologous breast reconstruction. It results in a sensate, more aesthetically pleasing breast. It has low complication rates and can be performed at the same time as a nipple reconstruction in type I patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1015-1024
Number of pages10
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume128
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Mammaplasty
Nipples
Breast
Skin
Esthetics
Cicatrix
Emotions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Secondary techniques in breast reconstruction refinement : The periareolar advancement flap. / Oni, Georgette; Saint-Cyr, Michel; Maia, Munique; Colohan, Shannon; Rohrich, Rod J.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 128, No. 5, 11.2011, p. 1015-1024.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oni, Georgette ; Saint-Cyr, Michel ; Maia, Munique ; Colohan, Shannon ; Rohrich, Rod J. / Secondary techniques in breast reconstruction refinement : The periareolar advancement flap. In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 128, No. 5. pp. 1015-1024.
@article{1d9dc1f0aced4ed183c197f273cd95a7,
title = "Secondary techniques in breast reconstruction refinement: The periareolar advancement flap",
abstract = "Background: Techniques in breast reconstruction have vastly improved with natural feeling, aesthetically pleasing breasts created through transfer of free or pedicled tissue. Traditional flap designs incorporate a skin paddle that leaves a {"}patch,{"} which can be fairly large on the nouveau breast, clearly delineating the boundaries between the reconstruction and the native skin. In this article, the authors discuss the operative technique and present a clinical series of patients undergoing the periareolar advancement flap procedure. This technique reduces the skin paddle either to a circumferential areola-size area onto which the nipple can be simultaneously reconstructed (type I) or a single linear scar (type II) across the breast mound, thus enhancing the aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast. MethodS: A retrospective review of all patients between 2007 and 2009 undergoing periareolar advancement flaps under the care of the senior author (M.S.C.) was performed. Type of reconstruction, staging of procedures, additional operations, and complications were recorded. Results: Fifteen patients had a type I procedure and six patients had a type II procedure. There were no major complications. One patient had minor nipple scabbing that resolved. All type I patients had concomitant nipple reconstructions at the time of their periareolar advancement flap. Conclusions: The periareolar advancement flap is a useful technique to include in the range of secondary revision procedures for further refinement of autologous breast reconstruction. It results in a sensate, more aesthetically pleasing breast. It has low complication rates and can be performed at the same time as a nipple reconstruction in type I patients.",
author = "Georgette Oni and Michel Saint-Cyr and Munique Maia and Shannon Colohan and Rohrich, {Rod J.}",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e6d2c",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "1015--1024",
journal = "Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "0032-1052",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary techniques in breast reconstruction refinement

T2 - The periareolar advancement flap

AU - Oni, Georgette

AU - Saint-Cyr, Michel

AU - Maia, Munique

AU - Colohan, Shannon

AU - Rohrich, Rod J.

PY - 2011/11

Y1 - 2011/11

N2 - Background: Techniques in breast reconstruction have vastly improved with natural feeling, aesthetically pleasing breasts created through transfer of free or pedicled tissue. Traditional flap designs incorporate a skin paddle that leaves a "patch," which can be fairly large on the nouveau breast, clearly delineating the boundaries between the reconstruction and the native skin. In this article, the authors discuss the operative technique and present a clinical series of patients undergoing the periareolar advancement flap procedure. This technique reduces the skin paddle either to a circumferential areola-size area onto which the nipple can be simultaneously reconstructed (type I) or a single linear scar (type II) across the breast mound, thus enhancing the aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast. MethodS: A retrospective review of all patients between 2007 and 2009 undergoing periareolar advancement flaps under the care of the senior author (M.S.C.) was performed. Type of reconstruction, staging of procedures, additional operations, and complications were recorded. Results: Fifteen patients had a type I procedure and six patients had a type II procedure. There were no major complications. One patient had minor nipple scabbing that resolved. All type I patients had concomitant nipple reconstructions at the time of their periareolar advancement flap. Conclusions: The periareolar advancement flap is a useful technique to include in the range of secondary revision procedures for further refinement of autologous breast reconstruction. It results in a sensate, more aesthetically pleasing breast. It has low complication rates and can be performed at the same time as a nipple reconstruction in type I patients.

AB - Background: Techniques in breast reconstruction have vastly improved with natural feeling, aesthetically pleasing breasts created through transfer of free or pedicled tissue. Traditional flap designs incorporate a skin paddle that leaves a "patch," which can be fairly large on the nouveau breast, clearly delineating the boundaries between the reconstruction and the native skin. In this article, the authors discuss the operative technique and present a clinical series of patients undergoing the periareolar advancement flap procedure. This technique reduces the skin paddle either to a circumferential areola-size area onto which the nipple can be simultaneously reconstructed (type I) or a single linear scar (type II) across the breast mound, thus enhancing the aesthetic appearance of the reconstructed breast. MethodS: A retrospective review of all patients between 2007 and 2009 undergoing periareolar advancement flaps under the care of the senior author (M.S.C.) was performed. Type of reconstruction, staging of procedures, additional operations, and complications were recorded. Results: Fifteen patients had a type I procedure and six patients had a type II procedure. There were no major complications. One patient had minor nipple scabbing that resolved. All type I patients had concomitant nipple reconstructions at the time of their periareolar advancement flap. Conclusions: The periareolar advancement flap is a useful technique to include in the range of secondary revision procedures for further refinement of autologous breast reconstruction. It results in a sensate, more aesthetically pleasing breast. It has low complication rates and can be performed at the same time as a nipple reconstruction in type I patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80155140283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80155140283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e6d2c

DO - 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e6d2c

M3 - Article

C2 - 22030484

AN - SCOPUS:80155140283

VL - 128

SP - 1015

EP - 1024

JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 0032-1052

IS - 5

ER -