Segmental spinal instrumentation

A preliminary report of 40 consecutive cases

J. A. Herring, D. R. Wenger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two groups of patients with complex scoliosis problems are presented. The majority of patients had neurogenic scoliosis. Thirty patients (Group A) had Harrington instrumentation with segmental wiring and were immobilized postoperatively. Instrument stability was best when sacral fixation was not required. Pseudarthrosis was especially likely when there was deficiency of posterior elements. Ten patients (Group B) had double L rod instrumentation, and six had no postoperative immobilization. Correction was maintained except in two patients with kyphotic curves. There were transient neurologic complications in both groups, nerve root contusion being the most common (four cases). It is concluded that segmental instrumentation provides significant improvement in stability over conventional Harrington instrumentation. The advantages of added stability must be weighed against the increased potential for neurologic complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-298
Number of pages14
JournalSpine
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1982

Fingerprint

Scoliosis
Nervous System
Pseudarthrosis
Contusions
Immobilization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Segmental spinal instrumentation : A preliminary report of 40 consecutive cases. / Herring, J. A.; Wenger, D. R.

In: Spine, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1982, p. 285-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fa2731602f64744899016a92a9df1ad,
title = "Segmental spinal instrumentation: A preliminary report of 40 consecutive cases",
abstract = "Two groups of patients with complex scoliosis problems are presented. The majority of patients had neurogenic scoliosis. Thirty patients (Group A) had Harrington instrumentation with segmental wiring and were immobilized postoperatively. Instrument stability was best when sacral fixation was not required. Pseudarthrosis was especially likely when there was deficiency of posterior elements. Ten patients (Group B) had double L rod instrumentation, and six had no postoperative immobilization. Correction was maintained except in two patients with kyphotic curves. There were transient neurologic complications in both groups, nerve root contusion being the most common (four cases). It is concluded that segmental instrumentation provides significant improvement in stability over conventional Harrington instrumentation. The advantages of added stability must be weighed against the increased potential for neurologic complications.",
author = "Herring, {J. A.} and Wenger, {D. R.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "285--298",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Segmental spinal instrumentation

T2 - A preliminary report of 40 consecutive cases

AU - Herring, J. A.

AU - Wenger, D. R.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - Two groups of patients with complex scoliosis problems are presented. The majority of patients had neurogenic scoliosis. Thirty patients (Group A) had Harrington instrumentation with segmental wiring and were immobilized postoperatively. Instrument stability was best when sacral fixation was not required. Pseudarthrosis was especially likely when there was deficiency of posterior elements. Ten patients (Group B) had double L rod instrumentation, and six had no postoperative immobilization. Correction was maintained except in two patients with kyphotic curves. There were transient neurologic complications in both groups, nerve root contusion being the most common (four cases). It is concluded that segmental instrumentation provides significant improvement in stability over conventional Harrington instrumentation. The advantages of added stability must be weighed against the increased potential for neurologic complications.

AB - Two groups of patients with complex scoliosis problems are presented. The majority of patients had neurogenic scoliosis. Thirty patients (Group A) had Harrington instrumentation with segmental wiring and were immobilized postoperatively. Instrument stability was best when sacral fixation was not required. Pseudarthrosis was especially likely when there was deficiency of posterior elements. Ten patients (Group B) had double L rod instrumentation, and six had no postoperative immobilization. Correction was maintained except in two patients with kyphotic curves. There were transient neurologic complications in both groups, nerve root contusion being the most common (four cases). It is concluded that segmental instrumentation provides significant improvement in stability over conventional Harrington instrumentation. The advantages of added stability must be weighed against the increased potential for neurologic complications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019944193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019944193&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 285

EP - 298

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 3

ER -