Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: A systematic review of the literature

Girish P. Joshi, Shireen Ahmad, Waleed Riad, Stanley Eckert, Frances Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of obesity has increased over the past 2 decades. In recent years, several studies have assessed perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. However, this evidence has not been reviewed and evaluated systematically. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1948 and May 2012, assessing perioperative outcome in adult obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. All studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported perioperative complications including unplanned hospital admission and readmission. RESULTS: A literature search revealed 23 studies (13 prospective and 10 retrospective), and 1 systematic review assessing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. A total of 106,119 patients were included in the analysis with 62,476 patients included in the prospective trials and 43,643 patients included in the retrospective trials (not including the systematic review of laparoscopic bariatric surgery). Of these, 39,548 patients underwent bariatric surgery. The super obese (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m2) appear to be at higher risk of complications. Patients undergoing nonbariatric surgery had a lower degree of obesity (BMI approximately 30 kg/m2). Patients undergoing bariatric surgery were morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m2), which is associated with a higher comorbidity burden. However, the lack of increase in unanticipated admission rate in this patient population may be related to thorough preoperative assessment and avoidance of patients with comorbid conditions. DISCUSSION: The literature lacks adequate information to make strong recommendations regarding appropriate selection of the obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery. The literature does indicate that the super obese (BMI >50 kg/m2) do present an increased risk for perioperative complications, while patient with lower BMIs do not seem to present any increased risk as long as any comorbidities are minimal or optimized before surgery. This review also identifies knowledge gaps and recommends future research required to guide optimal selection of obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1082-1091
Number of pages10
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume117
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
Patient Selection
Bariatric Surgery
Body Mass Index
Laparoscopy
Comorbidity
Obesity
Patient Readmission
Prospective Studies
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery : A systematic review of the literature. / Joshi, Girish P.; Ahmad, Shireen; Riad, Waleed; Eckert, Stanley; Chung, Frances.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 117, No. 5, 11.2013, p. 1082-1091.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Joshi, Girish P. ; Ahmad, Shireen ; Riad, Waleed ; Eckert, Stanley ; Chung, Frances. / Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery : A systematic review of the literature. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2013 ; Vol. 117, No. 5. pp. 1082-1091.
@article{42065c4049e0490ab4a29b7b7177dba8,
title = "Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: A systematic review of the literature",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The incidence of obesity has increased over the past 2 decades. In recent years, several studies have assessed perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. However, this evidence has not been reviewed and evaluated systematically. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1948 and May 2012, assessing perioperative outcome in adult obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. All studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported perioperative complications including unplanned hospital admission and readmission. RESULTS: A literature search revealed 23 studies (13 prospective and 10 retrospective), and 1 systematic review assessing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. A total of 106,119 patients were included in the analysis with 62,476 patients included in the prospective trials and 43,643 patients included in the retrospective trials (not including the systematic review of laparoscopic bariatric surgery). Of these, 39,548 patients underwent bariatric surgery. The super obese (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m2) appear to be at higher risk of complications. Patients undergoing nonbariatric surgery had a lower degree of obesity (BMI approximately 30 kg/m2). Patients undergoing bariatric surgery were morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m2), which is associated with a higher comorbidity burden. However, the lack of increase in unanticipated admission rate in this patient population may be related to thorough preoperative assessment and avoidance of patients with comorbid conditions. DISCUSSION: The literature lacks adequate information to make strong recommendations regarding appropriate selection of the obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery. The literature does indicate that the super obese (BMI >50 kg/m2) do present an increased risk for perioperative complications, while patient with lower BMIs do not seem to present any increased risk as long as any comorbidities are minimal or optimized before surgery. This review also identifies knowledge gaps and recommends future research required to guide optimal selection of obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery.",
author = "Joshi, {Girish P.} and Shireen Ahmad and Waleed Riad and Stanley Eckert and Frances Chung",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a823f4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "1082--1091",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection of obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery

T2 - A systematic review of the literature

AU - Joshi, Girish P.

AU - Ahmad, Shireen

AU - Riad, Waleed

AU - Eckert, Stanley

AU - Chung, Frances

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - BACKGROUND: The incidence of obesity has increased over the past 2 decades. In recent years, several studies have assessed perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. However, this evidence has not been reviewed and evaluated systematically. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1948 and May 2012, assessing perioperative outcome in adult obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. All studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported perioperative complications including unplanned hospital admission and readmission. RESULTS: A literature search revealed 23 studies (13 prospective and 10 retrospective), and 1 systematic review assessing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. A total of 106,119 patients were included in the analysis with 62,476 patients included in the prospective trials and 43,643 patients included in the retrospective trials (not including the systematic review of laparoscopic bariatric surgery). Of these, 39,548 patients underwent bariatric surgery. The super obese (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m2) appear to be at higher risk of complications. Patients undergoing nonbariatric surgery had a lower degree of obesity (BMI approximately 30 kg/m2). Patients undergoing bariatric surgery were morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m2), which is associated with a higher comorbidity burden. However, the lack of increase in unanticipated admission rate in this patient population may be related to thorough preoperative assessment and avoidance of patients with comorbid conditions. DISCUSSION: The literature lacks adequate information to make strong recommendations regarding appropriate selection of the obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery. The literature does indicate that the super obese (BMI >50 kg/m2) do present an increased risk for perioperative complications, while patient with lower BMIs do not seem to present any increased risk as long as any comorbidities are minimal or optimized before surgery. This review also identifies knowledge gaps and recommends future research required to guide optimal selection of obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery.

AB - BACKGROUND: The incidence of obesity has increased over the past 2 decades. In recent years, several studies have assessed perioperative outcomes in obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. However, this evidence has not been reviewed and evaluated systematically. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of studies published between 1948 and May 2012, assessing perioperative outcome in adult obese patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. All studies were eligible for inclusion if they reported perioperative complications including unplanned hospital admission and readmission. RESULTS: A literature search revealed 23 studies (13 prospective and 10 retrospective), and 1 systematic review assessing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. A total of 106,119 patients were included in the analysis with 62,476 patients included in the prospective trials and 43,643 patients included in the retrospective trials (not including the systematic review of laparoscopic bariatric surgery). Of these, 39,548 patients underwent bariatric surgery. The super obese (body mass index [BMI] >50 kg/m2) appear to be at higher risk of complications. Patients undergoing nonbariatric surgery had a lower degree of obesity (BMI approximately 30 kg/m2). Patients undergoing bariatric surgery were morbidly obese (BMI >40 kg/m2), which is associated with a higher comorbidity burden. However, the lack of increase in unanticipated admission rate in this patient population may be related to thorough preoperative assessment and avoidance of patients with comorbid conditions. DISCUSSION: The literature lacks adequate information to make strong recommendations regarding appropriate selection of the obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery. The literature does indicate that the super obese (BMI >50 kg/m2) do present an increased risk for perioperative complications, while patient with lower BMIs do not seem to present any increased risk as long as any comorbidities are minimal or optimized before surgery. This review also identifies knowledge gaps and recommends future research required to guide optimal selection of obese patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84887092114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84887092114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a823f4

DO - 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a823f4

M3 - Article

C2 - 24108263

AN - SCOPUS:84887092114

VL - 117

SP - 1082

EP - 1091

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 5

ER -