Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries

Demetrios Demetriades, Pantelis Hadjizacharia, Costas Constantinou, Carlos Brown, Kenji Inaba, Peter Rhee, Ali Salim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of selective nonoperative management in penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injuries has become the standard of care. However, routine surgical exploration remains the standard practice for all penetrating solid organ injuries. The present study examines the role of nonoperative management in selected patients with penetrating injuries to abdominal solid organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, protocol-driven study, which included all penetrating abdominal solid organ (liver, spleen, kidney) injuries admitted to a level I trauma center, over a 20-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or an unevaluable abdomen underwent an immediate laparotomy. Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis were selected for further CT scan evaluation. In the absence of CT scan findings suggestive of hollow viscus injury, the patients were observed with serial clinical examinations, hemoglobin levels, and white cell counts. Patients with left thoracoabdominal injuries underwent elective laparoscopy to rule out diaphragmatic injury. Outcome parameters included survival, complications, need for delayed laparotomy in observed patients, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 152 patients with 185 penetrating solid organ injuries. Gunshot wounds accounted for 70.4% and stab wounds for 29.6% of injuries. Ninety-one patients (59.9%) met the criteria for immediate operation. The remaining 61 (40.1%) patients were selected for CT scan evaluation. Forty-three patients (28.3% of all patients) with 47 solid organ injuries who had no CT scan findings suspicious of hollow viscus injury were selected for clinical observation and additional laparoscopy in 2. Four patients with a "blush" on CT scan underwent angiographic embolization of the liver. Overall, 41 patients (27.0%), including 18 cases with grade III to V injuries, were successfully managed without a laparotomy and without any abdominal complication. Overall, 28.4% of all liver, 14.9% of kidney, and 3.5% of splenic injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. Patients with isolated solid organ injuries treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay than patients treated operatively, even though the former group had more severe injuries. In 3 patients with failed nonoperative management and delayed laparotomy, there were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: In the appropriate environment, selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries has a high success rate and a low complication rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)620-626
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgery
Volume244
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2006

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Laparotomy
Length of Stay
Viscera
Peritonitis
Laparoscopy
Liver
Stab Wounds
Kidney
Abdominal Injuries
Gunshot Wounds
Trauma Centers
Standard of Care
Abdomen
Hemoglobins
Spleen
Cell Count
Hemodynamics
Observation
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Demetriades, D., Hadjizacharia, P., Constantinou, C., Brown, C., Inaba, K., Rhee, P., & Salim, A. (2006). Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. Annals of Surgery, 244(4), 620-626. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000237743.22633.01

Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. / Demetriades, Demetrios; Hadjizacharia, Pantelis; Constantinou, Costas; Brown, Carlos; Inaba, Kenji; Rhee, Peter; Salim, Ali.

In: Annals of Surgery, Vol. 244, No. 4, 10.2006, p. 620-626.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Demetriades, D, Hadjizacharia, P, Constantinou, C, Brown, C, Inaba, K, Rhee, P & Salim, A 2006, 'Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries', Annals of Surgery, vol. 244, no. 4, pp. 620-626. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000237743.22633.01
Demetriades D, Hadjizacharia P, Constantinou C, Brown C, Inaba K, Rhee P et al. Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. Annals of Surgery. 2006 Oct;244(4):620-626. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000237743.22633.01
Demetriades, Demetrios ; Hadjizacharia, Pantelis ; Constantinou, Costas ; Brown, Carlos ; Inaba, Kenji ; Rhee, Peter ; Salim, Ali. / Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. In: Annals of Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 244, No. 4. pp. 620-626.
@article{53c85020ce324b12a86a5c38e5c72f0d,
title = "Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of selective nonoperative management in penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injuries has become the standard of care. However, routine surgical exploration remains the standard practice for all penetrating solid organ injuries. The present study examines the role of nonoperative management in selected patients with penetrating injuries to abdominal solid organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, protocol-driven study, which included all penetrating abdominal solid organ (liver, spleen, kidney) injuries admitted to a level I trauma center, over a 20-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or an unevaluable abdomen underwent an immediate laparotomy. Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis were selected for further CT scan evaluation. In the absence of CT scan findings suggestive of hollow viscus injury, the patients were observed with serial clinical examinations, hemoglobin levels, and white cell counts. Patients with left thoracoabdominal injuries underwent elective laparoscopy to rule out diaphragmatic injury. Outcome parameters included survival, complications, need for delayed laparotomy in observed patients, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 152 patients with 185 penetrating solid organ injuries. Gunshot wounds accounted for 70.4{\%} and stab wounds for 29.6{\%} of injuries. Ninety-one patients (59.9{\%}) met the criteria for immediate operation. The remaining 61 (40.1{\%}) patients were selected for CT scan evaluation. Forty-three patients (28.3{\%} of all patients) with 47 solid organ injuries who had no CT scan findings suspicious of hollow viscus injury were selected for clinical observation and additional laparoscopy in 2. Four patients with a {"}blush{"} on CT scan underwent angiographic embolization of the liver. Overall, 41 patients (27.0{\%}), including 18 cases with grade III to V injuries, were successfully managed without a laparotomy and without any abdominal complication. Overall, 28.4{\%} of all liver, 14.9{\%} of kidney, and 3.5{\%} of splenic injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. Patients with isolated solid organ injuries treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay than patients treated operatively, even though the former group had more severe injuries. In 3 patients with failed nonoperative management and delayed laparotomy, there were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: In the appropriate environment, selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries has a high success rate and a low complication rate.",
author = "Demetrios Demetriades and Pantelis Hadjizacharia and Costas Constantinou and Carlos Brown and Kenji Inaba and Peter Rhee and Ali Salim",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1097/01.sla.0000237743.22633.01",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "244",
pages = "620--626",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries

AU - Demetriades, Demetrios

AU - Hadjizacharia, Pantelis

AU - Constantinou, Costas

AU - Brown, Carlos

AU - Inaba, Kenji

AU - Rhee, Peter

AU - Salim, Ali

PY - 2006/10

Y1 - 2006/10

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of selective nonoperative management in penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injuries has become the standard of care. However, routine surgical exploration remains the standard practice for all penetrating solid organ injuries. The present study examines the role of nonoperative management in selected patients with penetrating injuries to abdominal solid organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, protocol-driven study, which included all penetrating abdominal solid organ (liver, spleen, kidney) injuries admitted to a level I trauma center, over a 20-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or an unevaluable abdomen underwent an immediate laparotomy. Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis were selected for further CT scan evaluation. In the absence of CT scan findings suggestive of hollow viscus injury, the patients were observed with serial clinical examinations, hemoglobin levels, and white cell counts. Patients with left thoracoabdominal injuries underwent elective laparoscopy to rule out diaphragmatic injury. Outcome parameters included survival, complications, need for delayed laparotomy in observed patients, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 152 patients with 185 penetrating solid organ injuries. Gunshot wounds accounted for 70.4% and stab wounds for 29.6% of injuries. Ninety-one patients (59.9%) met the criteria for immediate operation. The remaining 61 (40.1%) patients were selected for CT scan evaluation. Forty-three patients (28.3% of all patients) with 47 solid organ injuries who had no CT scan findings suspicious of hollow viscus injury were selected for clinical observation and additional laparoscopy in 2. Four patients with a "blush" on CT scan underwent angiographic embolization of the liver. Overall, 41 patients (27.0%), including 18 cases with grade III to V injuries, were successfully managed without a laparotomy and without any abdominal complication. Overall, 28.4% of all liver, 14.9% of kidney, and 3.5% of splenic injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. Patients with isolated solid organ injuries treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay than patients treated operatively, even though the former group had more severe injuries. In 3 patients with failed nonoperative management and delayed laparotomy, there were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: In the appropriate environment, selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries has a high success rate and a low complication rate.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of selective nonoperative management in penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injuries has become the standard of care. However, routine surgical exploration remains the standard practice for all penetrating solid organ injuries. The present study examines the role of nonoperative management in selected patients with penetrating injuries to abdominal solid organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, protocol-driven study, which included all penetrating abdominal solid organ (liver, spleen, kidney) injuries admitted to a level I trauma center, over a 20-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or an unevaluable abdomen underwent an immediate laparotomy. Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis were selected for further CT scan evaluation. In the absence of CT scan findings suggestive of hollow viscus injury, the patients were observed with serial clinical examinations, hemoglobin levels, and white cell counts. Patients with left thoracoabdominal injuries underwent elective laparoscopy to rule out diaphragmatic injury. Outcome parameters included survival, complications, need for delayed laparotomy in observed patients, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 152 patients with 185 penetrating solid organ injuries. Gunshot wounds accounted for 70.4% and stab wounds for 29.6% of injuries. Ninety-one patients (59.9%) met the criteria for immediate operation. The remaining 61 (40.1%) patients were selected for CT scan evaluation. Forty-three patients (28.3% of all patients) with 47 solid organ injuries who had no CT scan findings suspicious of hollow viscus injury were selected for clinical observation and additional laparoscopy in 2. Four patients with a "blush" on CT scan underwent angiographic embolization of the liver. Overall, 41 patients (27.0%), including 18 cases with grade III to V injuries, were successfully managed without a laparotomy and without any abdominal complication. Overall, 28.4% of all liver, 14.9% of kidney, and 3.5% of splenic injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. Patients with isolated solid organ injuries treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay than patients treated operatively, even though the former group had more severe injuries. In 3 patients with failed nonoperative management and delayed laparotomy, there were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: In the appropriate environment, selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries has a high success rate and a low complication rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748940286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748940286&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.sla.0000237743.22633.01

DO - 10.1097/01.sla.0000237743.22633.01

M3 - Article

VL - 244

SP - 620

EP - 626

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 4

ER -