Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer

Rachel C. Forbes, Clovis Pitchford, Jean F. Simpson, Glen C. Balch, Mark C. Kelley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)955-960
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume71
Issue number11
StatePublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Touch
Breast Neoplasms
Neoplasm Metastasis
Lymph Node Excision
Neoplasm Micrometastasis
cyhalothrin
Mastectomy
Frozen Sections
Cell Biology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Forbes, R. C., Pitchford, C., Simpson, J. F., Balch, G. C., & Kelley, M. C. (2005). Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. American Surgeon, 71(11), 955-960.

Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. / Forbes, Rachel C.; Pitchford, Clovis; Simpson, Jean F.; Balch, Glen C.; Kelley, Mark C.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 71, No. 11, 2005, p. 955-960.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Forbes, RC, Pitchford, C, Simpson, JF, Balch, GC & Kelley, MC 2005, 'Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer', American Surgeon, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 955-960.
Forbes, Rachel C. ; Pitchford, Clovis ; Simpson, Jean F. ; Balch, Glen C. ; Kelley, Mark C. / Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. In: American Surgeon. 2005 ; Vol. 71, No. 11. pp. 955-960.
@article{940ff1bd1e2b41628f8ca4d87e8ab953,
title = "Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer",
abstract = "Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure.",
author = "Forbes, {Rachel C.} and Clovis Pitchford and Simpson, {Jean F.} and Balch, {Glen C.} and Kelley, {Mark C.}",
year = "2005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "955--960",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selective use of intraoperative touch prep analysis of sentinel nodes in breast cancer

AU - Forbes, Rachel C.

AU - Pitchford, Clovis

AU - Simpson, Jean F.

AU - Balch, Glen C.

AU - Kelley, Mark C.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure.

AB - Imprint cytology (touch prep) is often used for intraoperative examination of sentinel nodes in breast cancer. This allows axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to be performed immediately for tumor-positive nodes. We evaluated the accuracy of touch prep examination of sentinel nodes and its role in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. We analyzed 169 breast cancer patients who underwent 170 lymphatic mapping procedures with intraoperative touch prep examination. Results from the touch prep were correlated with histopathology and clinical variables. There were 115 true-negative, 35 true-positive, 15 false-negative, and 5 false-positive results. Touch prep had a sensitivity of 70 per cent and specificity of 96 per cent. Positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were all 88 per cent. The false-negative rate was 30 per cent and correlated with the size of the nodal metastasis and number of involved nodes, but not other patient factors. Touch prep is useful for the evaluation of sentinel nodes in breast cancer, but it has a lower sensitivity than initially reported, particularly in patients with micrometastases. False positive results occur, although they may be reduced after experience with the technique. We recommend that suspicious findings on touch prep should be confirmed by frozen section and that ALND only be performed for histologically documented metastases. We currently perform touch prep only in patients who are at high risk of nodal metastasis or will undergo mastectomy. This improves operative efficiency and limits the impact of false positive and negative results without dramatically increasing the number of patients who require a second surgical procedure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644789257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644789257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 955

EP - 960

JO - American Surgeon

JF - American Surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 11

ER -