Self-Regulating Interest: The Moderating Role of Hardiness and Conscientiousness

Carol Sansone, Deborah J. Wiebe, Carolyn Morgan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sansone, Weir, Harpster, and Morgan (1992) found that individuals intentionally regulated their interest in an activity when they had both the need (the task was boring) and a reason to exert the effort (an ostensible health benefit). The present study examined Hardiness and Conscientiousness as moderators of this self-regulatory process when individuals had the option of quitting in addition to the options of persisting and of engaging in interest-enhancing strategies. Undergraduates performed a boring copying activity under instructions to stop when they felt they could evaluate the task. Half were told that their evaluations would help researchers develop good jobs for others (Benefit). Results indicated high hardy individuals copied more letters when they were provided the additional Benefit information, and this effect was mediated through their attempt to make the task more interesting. High conscientious individuals persisted longer than individuals lower in conscientiousness independently of the benefit manipulation or strategy use. Implications of individual differences in self-regulation of motivation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)701-733
Number of pages33
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume67
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 1999

Fingerprint

Insurance Benefits
Individuality
Motivation
Research Personnel
Self-Control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Sansone, C., Wiebe, D. J., & Morgan, C. (1999). Self-Regulating Interest: The Moderating Role of Hardiness and Conscientiousness. Journal of Personality, 67(4), 701-733.

Self-Regulating Interest : The Moderating Role of Hardiness and Conscientiousness. / Sansone, Carol; Wiebe, Deborah J.; Morgan, Carolyn.

In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 67, No. 4, 08.1999, p. 701-733.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sansone, C, Wiebe, DJ & Morgan, C 1999, 'Self-Regulating Interest: The Moderating Role of Hardiness and Conscientiousness', Journal of Personality, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 701-733.
Sansone, Carol ; Wiebe, Deborah J. ; Morgan, Carolyn. / Self-Regulating Interest : The Moderating Role of Hardiness and Conscientiousness. In: Journal of Personality. 1999 ; Vol. 67, No. 4. pp. 701-733.
@article{af6d03d178f542da934ca67b043a739d,
title = "Self-Regulating Interest: The Moderating Role of Hardiness and Conscientiousness",
abstract = "Sansone, Weir, Harpster, and Morgan (1992) found that individuals intentionally regulated their interest in an activity when they had both the need (the task was boring) and a reason to exert the effort (an ostensible health benefit). The present study examined Hardiness and Conscientiousness as moderators of this self-regulatory process when individuals had the option of quitting in addition to the options of persisting and of engaging in interest-enhancing strategies. Undergraduates performed a boring copying activity under instructions to stop when they felt they could evaluate the task. Half were told that their evaluations would help researchers develop good jobs for others (Benefit). Results indicated high hardy individuals copied more letters when they were provided the additional Benefit information, and this effect was mediated through their attempt to make the task more interesting. High conscientious individuals persisted longer than individuals lower in conscientiousness independently of the benefit manipulation or strategy use. Implications of individual differences in self-regulation of motivation are discussed.",
author = "Carol Sansone and Wiebe, {Deborah J.} and Carolyn Morgan",
year = "1999",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "701--733",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-Regulating Interest

T2 - The Moderating Role of Hardiness and Conscientiousness

AU - Sansone, Carol

AU - Wiebe, Deborah J.

AU - Morgan, Carolyn

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - Sansone, Weir, Harpster, and Morgan (1992) found that individuals intentionally regulated their interest in an activity when they had both the need (the task was boring) and a reason to exert the effort (an ostensible health benefit). The present study examined Hardiness and Conscientiousness as moderators of this self-regulatory process when individuals had the option of quitting in addition to the options of persisting and of engaging in interest-enhancing strategies. Undergraduates performed a boring copying activity under instructions to stop when they felt they could evaluate the task. Half were told that their evaluations would help researchers develop good jobs for others (Benefit). Results indicated high hardy individuals copied more letters when they were provided the additional Benefit information, and this effect was mediated through their attempt to make the task more interesting. High conscientious individuals persisted longer than individuals lower in conscientiousness independently of the benefit manipulation or strategy use. Implications of individual differences in self-regulation of motivation are discussed.

AB - Sansone, Weir, Harpster, and Morgan (1992) found that individuals intentionally regulated their interest in an activity when they had both the need (the task was boring) and a reason to exert the effort (an ostensible health benefit). The present study examined Hardiness and Conscientiousness as moderators of this self-regulatory process when individuals had the option of quitting in addition to the options of persisting and of engaging in interest-enhancing strategies. Undergraduates performed a boring copying activity under instructions to stop when they felt they could evaluate the task. Half were told that their evaluations would help researchers develop good jobs for others (Benefit). Results indicated high hardy individuals copied more letters when they were provided the additional Benefit information, and this effect was mediated through their attempt to make the task more interesting. High conscientious individuals persisted longer than individuals lower in conscientiousness independently of the benefit manipulation or strategy use. Implications of individual differences in self-regulation of motivation are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033175687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033175687&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10444855

AN - SCOPUS:0033175687

VL - 67

SP - 701

EP - 733

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 4

ER -