Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes

A nested matched case-control study

Yang Wang, Christopher J. Lindsell, Charles V. Pollack, Judd Hollander, Deborah B. Diercks, J. Douglas Kirk, Venkataraman Anantharaman, W. Brian Gibler, James Hoekstra, W. Frank Peacock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The primary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome-pertinent diagnostic testing between self-reported cocaine users and non-users at the turn of the century. The secondary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome outcomes between cocaine users and non-users. Design: Nested matched case-control study using data from the Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Setting: Extracted data of patients from eight US institutions composed of six academic and two community hospitals, with census varying between 10 000 and 160 000 visits per year. Participants: 249 cases of self-reported cocaine users and 249 matched controls. Matching was based on age, race, sex and any history of known coronary artery disease. Exclusion criteria were new ST elevations on initial ECG and initial physician impression of acute myocardial infarction. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcome was the conditional odds of undergoing non-invasive and invasive testing for coronary artery disease. Secondary outcome was the occurrences of adverse cardiac outcomes within 30 days. Results: Cocaine users underwent diagnostic testing at similar rates compared with non-users (9.6% vs 8.0%, OR 1.24, CI 0.65 to 2.34). Adverse cardiovascular outcomes occurred in four (1.6%) cocaine users and in seven (2.8%) controls. Conclusions: There was no increase in tendency for testing associated with self-reported history of cocaine use between 1999 and 2001. This suggests that even 10 years ago, cocaine use already had only a limited role in the Emergency Department (ED) physician's decision-making process. Similar data analyses of detailed registries can offer important contextual information that can better direct resources for future comparative effectiveness research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere000572
JournalBMJ Open
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Acute Coronary Syndrome
Cocaine
Case-Control Studies
Emergencies
Physicians
Registries
Coronary Artery Disease
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Community Hospital
Censuses
Internet
Hospital Emergency Service
Decision Making
Electrocardiography
Myocardial Infarction
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes : A nested matched case-control study. / Wang, Yang; Lindsell, Christopher J.; Pollack, Charles V.; Hollander, Judd; Diercks, Deborah B.; Kirk, J. Douglas; Anantharaman, Venkataraman; Gibler, W. Brian; Hoekstra, James; Peacock, W. Frank.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 2, No. 3, e000572, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wang, Y, Lindsell, CJ, Pollack, CV, Hollander, J, Diercks, DB, Kirk, JD, Anantharaman, V, Gibler, WB, Hoekstra, J & Peacock, WF 2012, 'Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes: A nested matched case-control study', BMJ Open, vol. 2, no. 3, e000572. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000572
Wang, Yang ; Lindsell, Christopher J. ; Pollack, Charles V. ; Hollander, Judd ; Diercks, Deborah B. ; Kirk, J. Douglas ; Anantharaman, Venkataraman ; Gibler, W. Brian ; Hoekstra, James ; Peacock, W. Frank. / Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes : A nested matched case-control study. In: BMJ Open. 2012 ; Vol. 2, No. 3.
@article{27ef4ffd68fb48509520b8bf752097c8,
title = "Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes: A nested matched case-control study",
abstract = "Objectives: The primary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome-pertinent diagnostic testing between self-reported cocaine users and non-users at the turn of the century. The secondary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome outcomes between cocaine users and non-users. Design: Nested matched case-control study using data from the Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Setting: Extracted data of patients from eight US institutions composed of six academic and two community hospitals, with census varying between 10 000 and 160 000 visits per year. Participants: 249 cases of self-reported cocaine users and 249 matched controls. Matching was based on age, race, sex and any history of known coronary artery disease. Exclusion criteria were new ST elevations on initial ECG and initial physician impression of acute myocardial infarction. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcome was the conditional odds of undergoing non-invasive and invasive testing for coronary artery disease. Secondary outcome was the occurrences of adverse cardiac outcomes within 30 days. Results: Cocaine users underwent diagnostic testing at similar rates compared with non-users (9.6{\%} vs 8.0{\%}, OR 1.24, CI 0.65 to 2.34). Adverse cardiovascular outcomes occurred in four (1.6{\%}) cocaine users and in seven (2.8{\%}) controls. Conclusions: There was no increase in tendency for testing associated with self-reported history of cocaine use between 1999 and 2001. This suggests that even 10 years ago, cocaine use already had only a limited role in the Emergency Department (ED) physician's decision-making process. Similar data analyses of detailed registries can offer important contextual information that can better direct resources for future comparative effectiveness research.",
author = "Yang Wang and Lindsell, {Christopher J.} and Pollack, {Charles V.} and Judd Hollander and Diercks, {Deborah B.} and Kirk, {J. Douglas} and Venkataraman Anantharaman and Gibler, {W. Brian} and James Hoekstra and Peacock, {W. Frank}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000572",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-reported cocaine use, emergency physician testing and outcomes in suspected acute coronary syndromes

T2 - A nested matched case-control study

AU - Wang, Yang

AU - Lindsell, Christopher J.

AU - Pollack, Charles V.

AU - Hollander, Judd

AU - Diercks, Deborah B.

AU - Kirk, J. Douglas

AU - Anantharaman, Venkataraman

AU - Gibler, W. Brian

AU - Hoekstra, James

AU - Peacock, W. Frank

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objectives: The primary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome-pertinent diagnostic testing between self-reported cocaine users and non-users at the turn of the century. The secondary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome outcomes between cocaine users and non-users. Design: Nested matched case-control study using data from the Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Setting: Extracted data of patients from eight US institutions composed of six academic and two community hospitals, with census varying between 10 000 and 160 000 visits per year. Participants: 249 cases of self-reported cocaine users and 249 matched controls. Matching was based on age, race, sex and any history of known coronary artery disease. Exclusion criteria were new ST elevations on initial ECG and initial physician impression of acute myocardial infarction. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcome was the conditional odds of undergoing non-invasive and invasive testing for coronary artery disease. Secondary outcome was the occurrences of adverse cardiac outcomes within 30 days. Results: Cocaine users underwent diagnostic testing at similar rates compared with non-users (9.6% vs 8.0%, OR 1.24, CI 0.65 to 2.34). Adverse cardiovascular outcomes occurred in four (1.6%) cocaine users and in seven (2.8%) controls. Conclusions: There was no increase in tendency for testing associated with self-reported history of cocaine use between 1999 and 2001. This suggests that even 10 years ago, cocaine use already had only a limited role in the Emergency Department (ED) physician's decision-making process. Similar data analyses of detailed registries can offer important contextual information that can better direct resources for future comparative effectiveness research.

AB - Objectives: The primary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome-pertinent diagnostic testing between self-reported cocaine users and non-users at the turn of the century. The secondary purpose was to compare the odds of acute coronary syndrome outcomes between cocaine users and non-users. Design: Nested matched case-control study using data from the Internet Tracking Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes. Setting: Extracted data of patients from eight US institutions composed of six academic and two community hospitals, with census varying between 10 000 and 160 000 visits per year. Participants: 249 cases of self-reported cocaine users and 249 matched controls. Matching was based on age, race, sex and any history of known coronary artery disease. Exclusion criteria were new ST elevations on initial ECG and initial physician impression of acute myocardial infarction. Primary and secondary outcome measures: Primary outcome was the conditional odds of undergoing non-invasive and invasive testing for coronary artery disease. Secondary outcome was the occurrences of adverse cardiac outcomes within 30 days. Results: Cocaine users underwent diagnostic testing at similar rates compared with non-users (9.6% vs 8.0%, OR 1.24, CI 0.65 to 2.34). Adverse cardiovascular outcomes occurred in four (1.6%) cocaine users and in seven (2.8%) controls. Conclusions: There was no increase in tendency for testing associated with self-reported history of cocaine use between 1999 and 2001. This suggests that even 10 years ago, cocaine use already had only a limited role in the Emergency Department (ED) physician's decision-making process. Similar data analyses of detailed registries can offer important contextual information that can better direct resources for future comparative effectiveness research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862225188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862225188&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000572

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000572

M3 - Article

VL - 2

JO - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 3

M1 - e000572

ER -