Sex differences in upper tract urothelial carcinomas

Nirmish Singla, Rashed A. Ghandour, Vitaly Margulis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate contemporary sex-specific differences in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by reviewing diagnostic considerations, clinicopathologic features, oncologic outcomes, environmental exposures, and regional variation in UTUC by sex. RECENT FINDINGS: Although some contemporary studies implicate sex-based differences in UTUC, the literature concerning the effect of sex on clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes in UTUC reveals mixed findings. Factors accounting for the time to diagnosis in UTUC seem to differ between men and women. The epidemiology and outcomes of UTUC are largely influenced by geographic variation in the disease, which may be due to differences in exposure to environmental risk factors. Sex-based variations and potential differences in disease biology remain to be elucidated. SUMMARY: A global consensus on the effect of sex on clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes in UTUC has not been established definitively. Review of this topic does, however, shed light on important considerations given differences in the time to diagnosis, risk factors, and regional variation by sex. Further studies evaluating genetic, anatomic, physiologic, and socioeconomic differences between men and women with UTUC may provide further insight into understanding the effect of sex in UTUC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)256-260
Number of pages5
JournalCurrent opinion in urology
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Carcinoma
Environmental Exposure
Epidemiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Sex differences in upper tract urothelial carcinomas. / Singla, Nirmish; Ghandour, Rashed A.; Margulis, Vitaly.

In: Current opinion in urology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 256-260.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Singla, Nirmish ; Ghandour, Rashed A. ; Margulis, Vitaly. / Sex differences in upper tract urothelial carcinomas. In: Current opinion in urology. 2019 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 256-260.
@article{c1ac68c2b4844478902743a209c2b287,
title = "Sex differences in upper tract urothelial carcinomas",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate contemporary sex-specific differences in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by reviewing diagnostic considerations, clinicopathologic features, oncologic outcomes, environmental exposures, and regional variation in UTUC by sex. RECENT FINDINGS: Although some contemporary studies implicate sex-based differences in UTUC, the literature concerning the effect of sex on clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes in UTUC reveals mixed findings. Factors accounting for the time to diagnosis in UTUC seem to differ between men and women. The epidemiology and outcomes of UTUC are largely influenced by geographic variation in the disease, which may be due to differences in exposure to environmental risk factors. Sex-based variations and potential differences in disease biology remain to be elucidated. SUMMARY: A global consensus on the effect of sex on clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes in UTUC has not been established definitively. Review of this topic does, however, shed light on important considerations given differences in the time to diagnosis, risk factors, and regional variation by sex. Further studies evaluating genetic, anatomic, physiologic, and socioeconomic differences between men and women with UTUC may provide further insight into understanding the effect of sex in UTUC.",
author = "Nirmish Singla and Ghandour, {Rashed A.} and Vitaly Margulis",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/MOU.0000000000000596",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "256--260",
journal = "Current Opinion in Urology",
issn = "0963-0643",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sex differences in upper tract urothelial carcinomas

AU - Singla, Nirmish

AU - Ghandour, Rashed A.

AU - Margulis, Vitaly

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate contemporary sex-specific differences in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by reviewing diagnostic considerations, clinicopathologic features, oncologic outcomes, environmental exposures, and regional variation in UTUC by sex. RECENT FINDINGS: Although some contemporary studies implicate sex-based differences in UTUC, the literature concerning the effect of sex on clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes in UTUC reveals mixed findings. Factors accounting for the time to diagnosis in UTUC seem to differ between men and women. The epidemiology and outcomes of UTUC are largely influenced by geographic variation in the disease, which may be due to differences in exposure to environmental risk factors. Sex-based variations and potential differences in disease biology remain to be elucidated. SUMMARY: A global consensus on the effect of sex on clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes in UTUC has not been established definitively. Review of this topic does, however, shed light on important considerations given differences in the time to diagnosis, risk factors, and regional variation by sex. Further studies evaluating genetic, anatomic, physiologic, and socioeconomic differences between men and women with UTUC may provide further insight into understanding the effect of sex in UTUC.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate contemporary sex-specific differences in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by reviewing diagnostic considerations, clinicopathologic features, oncologic outcomes, environmental exposures, and regional variation in UTUC by sex. RECENT FINDINGS: Although some contemporary studies implicate sex-based differences in UTUC, the literature concerning the effect of sex on clinicopathologic features and oncologic outcomes in UTUC reveals mixed findings. Factors accounting for the time to diagnosis in UTUC seem to differ between men and women. The epidemiology and outcomes of UTUC are largely influenced by geographic variation in the disease, which may be due to differences in exposure to environmental risk factors. Sex-based variations and potential differences in disease biology remain to be elucidated. SUMMARY: A global consensus on the effect of sex on clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes in UTUC has not been established definitively. Review of this topic does, however, shed light on important considerations given differences in the time to diagnosis, risk factors, and regional variation by sex. Further studies evaluating genetic, anatomic, physiologic, and socioeconomic differences between men and women with UTUC may provide further insight into understanding the effect of sex in UTUC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064315590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064315590&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000596

DO - 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000596

M3 - Article

C2 - 30762671

AN - SCOPUS:85064315590

VL - 29

SP - 256

EP - 260

JO - Current Opinion in Urology

JF - Current Opinion in Urology

SN - 0963-0643

IS - 3

ER -