Shifting paradigms in diminished ovarian reserve and advanced reproductive age in assisted reproduction: Customization instead of conformity

Beverly G. Reed, Samir N. Babayev, Orhan Bukulmez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As women are increasingly delaying childbearing into their 30s and beyond, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and advanced reproductive age (ARA) patients are bound to become a large proportion of all assisted reproductive technology practices. Traditional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for DOR and/or ARA have had some limited success, but pregnancy rates are lower and cycle cancellation rates are higher than their younger counterparts with normal ovarian reserve. Though many physicians have a selection of favorite standard protocols that they use, patients with DOR may require closer monitoring and customization of the treatment cycle to address the common problems that come with low ovarian reserve. Frequent issues that surface in women with DOR and/or ARA include poor follicular response, premature luteinizing hormone surge, and poor embryo quality. Limited published evidence exists to guide treatment for DOR. However, use of minimal or mild doses of gonadotropins, avoidance of severe pituitary suppression, and consideration for luteal phase stimulation and a freeze all approach are possible customized treatment options that can be considered for such patients who have failed more traditional COS protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-178
Number of pages10
JournalSeminars in Reproductive Medicine
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2015

Fingerprint

Reproduction
Ovulation Induction
Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Luteal Phase
Pregnancy Rate
Luteinizing Hormone
Ovarian Reserve
Gonadotropins
Therapeutics
Embryonic Structures
Physicians

Keywords

  • advanced reproductive age
  • diminished ovarian reserve
  • luteal phase stimulation
  • minimal stimulation
  • poor responder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Endocrinology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Cite this

Shifting paradigms in diminished ovarian reserve and advanced reproductive age in assisted reproduction : Customization instead of conformity. / Reed, Beverly G.; Babayev, Samir N.; Bukulmez, Orhan.

In: Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, Vol. 33, No. 3, 04.05.2015, p. 169-178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b40f953b4a1646bf9d427b095988a956,
title = "Shifting paradigms in diminished ovarian reserve and advanced reproductive age in assisted reproduction: Customization instead of conformity",
abstract = "As women are increasingly delaying childbearing into their 30s and beyond, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and advanced reproductive age (ARA) patients are bound to become a large proportion of all assisted reproductive technology practices. Traditional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for DOR and/or ARA have had some limited success, but pregnancy rates are lower and cycle cancellation rates are higher than their younger counterparts with normal ovarian reserve. Though many physicians have a selection of favorite standard protocols that they use, patients with DOR may require closer monitoring and customization of the treatment cycle to address the common problems that come with low ovarian reserve. Frequent issues that surface in women with DOR and/or ARA include poor follicular response, premature luteinizing hormone surge, and poor embryo quality. Limited published evidence exists to guide treatment for DOR. However, use of minimal or mild doses of gonadotropins, avoidance of severe pituitary suppression, and consideration for luteal phase stimulation and a freeze all approach are possible customized treatment options that can be considered for such patients who have failed more traditional COS protocols.",
keywords = "advanced reproductive age, diminished ovarian reserve, luteal phase stimulation, minimal stimulation, poor responder",
author = "Reed, {Beverly G.} and Babayev, {Samir N.} and Orhan Bukulmez",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1055/s-0035-1552585",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "169--178",
journal = "Seminars in Reproductive Medicine",
issn = "1526-8004",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shifting paradigms in diminished ovarian reserve and advanced reproductive age in assisted reproduction

T2 - Customization instead of conformity

AU - Reed, Beverly G.

AU - Babayev, Samir N.

AU - Bukulmez, Orhan

PY - 2015/5/4

Y1 - 2015/5/4

N2 - As women are increasingly delaying childbearing into their 30s and beyond, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and advanced reproductive age (ARA) patients are bound to become a large proportion of all assisted reproductive technology practices. Traditional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for DOR and/or ARA have had some limited success, but pregnancy rates are lower and cycle cancellation rates are higher than their younger counterparts with normal ovarian reserve. Though many physicians have a selection of favorite standard protocols that they use, patients with DOR may require closer monitoring and customization of the treatment cycle to address the common problems that come with low ovarian reserve. Frequent issues that surface in women with DOR and/or ARA include poor follicular response, premature luteinizing hormone surge, and poor embryo quality. Limited published evidence exists to guide treatment for DOR. However, use of minimal or mild doses of gonadotropins, avoidance of severe pituitary suppression, and consideration for luteal phase stimulation and a freeze all approach are possible customized treatment options that can be considered for such patients who have failed more traditional COS protocols.

AB - As women are increasingly delaying childbearing into their 30s and beyond, diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and advanced reproductive age (ARA) patients are bound to become a large proportion of all assisted reproductive technology practices. Traditional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for DOR and/or ARA have had some limited success, but pregnancy rates are lower and cycle cancellation rates are higher than their younger counterparts with normal ovarian reserve. Though many physicians have a selection of favorite standard protocols that they use, patients with DOR may require closer monitoring and customization of the treatment cycle to address the common problems that come with low ovarian reserve. Frequent issues that surface in women with DOR and/or ARA include poor follicular response, premature luteinizing hormone surge, and poor embryo quality. Limited published evidence exists to guide treatment for DOR. However, use of minimal or mild doses of gonadotropins, avoidance of severe pituitary suppression, and consideration for luteal phase stimulation and a freeze all approach are possible customized treatment options that can be considered for such patients who have failed more traditional COS protocols.

KW - advanced reproductive age

KW - diminished ovarian reserve

KW - luteal phase stimulation

KW - minimal stimulation

KW - poor responder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930650584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930650584&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0035-1552585

DO - 10.1055/s-0035-1552585

M3 - Article

C2 - 26036898

AN - SCOPUS:84930650584

VL - 33

SP - 169

EP - 178

JO - Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

JF - Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

SN - 1526-8004

IS - 3

ER -