TY - JOUR
T1 - Short-term efficacy of temperature-based radiofrequency ablation of small renal tumors
AU - Matsumoto, Edward D.
AU - Johnson, D. Brooke
AU - Ogan, Kenneth
AU - Trimmer, Clayton K
AU - Sagalowsky, Arthur I
AU - Margulis, Vitaly
AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Objectives. To present our experience using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small renal tumors. Our objective was to assess the short-term (1 to 3 years) oncologic efficacy of RFA. Methods. Consecutive renal tumors treated since May 2001 with a minimal follow-up of 6 months were included. Patients were treated with a temperature-based radiofrequency generator and were followed up with serial imaging at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Results. A total of 109 small renal tumors (91 patients) were treated with computed tomography-guided percutaneous RFA (n = 63) or laparoscopic RFA (n = 46). The mean tumor size was 2.4 cm (range 0.8 to 4.7). The initial ablation was successful in 107 (98%) of 109 tumors. The two incomplete ablations were successfully re-ablated. Of the 60 patients with at least 1 year of follow-up, 60% had biopsy proven renal cell carcinoma (an additional 24% had no tissue diagnosis). In this group, one local recurrence (1.7%) was detected during a mean follow-up of 19.4 months (range 12 to 33), and in those with known renal cell carcinoma, none had evidence of distant progression (0%). The local recurrence was successfully re-ablated such that all 109 cases had no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease at last follow-up. Three patients died of causes unrelated to cancer. Conclusions. The results of our study have shown that in the short term, RFA appears to be a reasonable therapeutic nephron-sparing approach for treating select patients with small renal tumors. The cancer control appears adequate to date, but longer follow-up is necessary before widespread application.
AB - Objectives. To present our experience using radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for the treatment of small renal tumors. Our objective was to assess the short-term (1 to 3 years) oncologic efficacy of RFA. Methods. Consecutive renal tumors treated since May 2001 with a minimal follow-up of 6 months were included. Patients were treated with a temperature-based radiofrequency generator and were followed up with serial imaging at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and every 6 months thereafter. Results. A total of 109 small renal tumors (91 patients) were treated with computed tomography-guided percutaneous RFA (n = 63) or laparoscopic RFA (n = 46). The mean tumor size was 2.4 cm (range 0.8 to 4.7). The initial ablation was successful in 107 (98%) of 109 tumors. The two incomplete ablations were successfully re-ablated. Of the 60 patients with at least 1 year of follow-up, 60% had biopsy proven renal cell carcinoma (an additional 24% had no tissue diagnosis). In this group, one local recurrence (1.7%) was detected during a mean follow-up of 19.4 months (range 12 to 33), and in those with known renal cell carcinoma, none had evidence of distant progression (0%). The local recurrence was successfully re-ablated such that all 109 cases had no clinical or radiographic evidence of disease at last follow-up. Three patients died of causes unrelated to cancer. Conclusions. The results of our study have shown that in the short term, RFA appears to be a reasonable therapeutic nephron-sparing approach for treating select patients with small renal tumors. The cancer control appears adequate to date, but longer follow-up is necessary before widespread application.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18844423786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18844423786&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.011
DO - 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 15882715
AN - SCOPUS:18844423786
SN - 0090-4295
VL - 65
SP - 877
EP - 881
JO - Urology
JF - Urology
IS - 5
ER -