Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians? Insights from the STS/ACC TVT Registry

Mani Arsalan, Molly Szerlip, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Elizabeth M. Holper, Suzanne V. Arnold, Zhuokai Li, Michael J. Dimaio, John S. Rumsfeld, David L. Brown, Michael J. Mack

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Data demonstrating the outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the very elderly patients are limited, as they often represent only a small proportion of the trial populations. Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of nonagenarians to younger patients undergoing TAVR in current practice. Methods We analyzed data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry. Outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were compared between patients ≥90 years versus <90 years of age using cumulative incidence curves. Quality of life was assessed with the 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire. Results Between November 2011 and September 2014, 24,025 patients underwent TAVR in 329 participating hospitals, of which 3,773 (15.7%) were age ≥90 years. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were significantly higher among nonagenarians (age ≥90 years vs. <90 years: 30-day: 8.8% vs. 5.9%; p < 0.001; 1 year: 24.8% vs. 22.0%; p < 0.001, absolute risk: 2.8%, relative risk: 12.7%). However, nonagenarians had a higher mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Operative Mortality score (10.9% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.001) and, therefore, had similar ratios of observed to expected rates of 30-day death (age ≥90 years vs. <90 years: 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.92 vs. 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 0.78). There were no differences in the rates of stroke, aortic valve reintervention, or myocardial infarction at 30 days or 1 year. Nonagenarians had lower (worse) median Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores at 30 days; however, there was no significant difference at 1 year. Conclusions In current U.S. clinical practice, approximately 16% of patients undergoing TAVR are ≥90 years of age. Although 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were statistically higher compared with younger patients undergoing TAVR, the absolute and relative differences were clinically modest. TAVR also improves quality of life to the same degree in nonagenarians as in younger patients. These data support safety and efficacy of TAVR in select very elderly patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1387-1395
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American College of Cardiology
Volume67
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 29 2016

Keywords

  • TAVI
  • TAVR
  • centenarians
  • elderly
  • quality of life
  • transcatheter aortic valve implantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians? Insights from the STS/ACC TVT Registry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Arsalan, M., Szerlip, M., Vemulapalli, S., Holper, E. M., Arnold, S. V., Li, Z., Dimaio, M. J., Rumsfeld, J. S., Brown, D. L., & Mack, M. J. (2016). Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians? Insights from the STS/ACC TVT Registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 67(12), 1387-1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.055