Should We Routinely Stent the Femoropopliteal Artery? An Interventionalist's Perspective

Nicolas W. Shammas, Subhash Banerjee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Stenting of femoropopliteal (FP) arterial disease is currently the most common strategy adopted by endovascular specialists. Several randomized trials have shown that stenting with nitinol self-expanding stents leads to less restenosis on intermediate-term and long-term follow-up when compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) and provisional stenting. In this overview, we present the pros and cons of primary stenting of FP arteries vs alternative approaches including provisional stenting following POBA, atherectomy and/or drug-coated balloons, and how these initial non-stent strategies play a significant role in treating FP arterial disease.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E258-E261
JournalJournal of Invasive Cardiology
Volume27
Issue number11
Publication statusPublished - Nov 1 2015

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Atherectomy
  • Drug-coated balloons
  • Drug-eluting stents
  • Femoropopliteal
  • Patency
  • Restenosis
  • Scoring balloons
  • Stent
  • Target lesion revascularization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this