Signatures of multiple processes contributing to fluid reasoning performance

Ehsan Shokri-Kojori, Daniel C. Krawczyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We aimed to achieve a better understanding of the cognitive processes of fluid reasoning (or fluid intelligence; Gf), the ability to reason in novel conditions. While fluid reasoning has often been considered a unitary construct, multiple cognitive processes are expected to affect fluid reasoning performance. Yet, the contribution of various cognitive processes in fluid reasoning performance remains under-explored. We hypothesized that individual differences in fluid intelligence can be viewed as a composite of individual differences in performance in various processes of Gf. Change detection, rule verification, and rule generation were the three processes-of-interest that were additively recruited in a novel visuospatial reasoning task. We observed decreases in accuracy and increases in response time as the processing requirements increased across task conditions. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses showed that individual differences in the likelihood of success and speed of each of these processes, accounted for different aspects of individual differences in accuracy and response time in fluid reasoning performance, as measured by Raven's Progressive Matrices. Change detection was a significant contributor to performance in problems with higher visuospatial demand, however, rule verification and rule generation consistently contributed to performance for all problem types. Our findings support the position that individual differences in fluid intelligence emerge as a composite of performance on separable cognitive operations, with rule processing being important for differentiating performance on high difficulty problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)87-99
Number of pages13
JournalIntelligence
Volume68
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2018

Fingerprint

Individuality
Intelligence
Reaction Time
Crows
Aptitude
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Signature
Individual Differences
Cognitive Processes

Keywords

  • Fluid intelligence
  • Individual differences
  • Multi-process
  • Raven's progressive matrices

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Signatures of multiple processes contributing to fluid reasoning performance. / Shokri-Kojori, Ehsan; Krawczyk, Daniel C.

In: Intelligence, Vol. 68, 01.05.2018, p. 87-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{348a84d9d082455a9dbe67eba0318ef3,
title = "Signatures of multiple processes contributing to fluid reasoning performance",
abstract = "We aimed to achieve a better understanding of the cognitive processes of fluid reasoning (or fluid intelligence; Gf), the ability to reason in novel conditions. While fluid reasoning has often been considered a unitary construct, multiple cognitive processes are expected to affect fluid reasoning performance. Yet, the contribution of various cognitive processes in fluid reasoning performance remains under-explored. We hypothesized that individual differences in fluid intelligence can be viewed as a composite of individual differences in performance in various processes of Gf. Change detection, rule verification, and rule generation were the three processes-of-interest that were additively recruited in a novel visuospatial reasoning task. We observed decreases in accuracy and increases in response time as the processing requirements increased across task conditions. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses showed that individual differences in the likelihood of success and speed of each of these processes, accounted for different aspects of individual differences in accuracy and response time in fluid reasoning performance, as measured by Raven's Progressive Matrices. Change detection was a significant contributor to performance in problems with higher visuospatial demand, however, rule verification and rule generation consistently contributed to performance for all problem types. Our findings support the position that individual differences in fluid intelligence emerge as a composite of performance on separable cognitive operations, with rule processing being important for differentiating performance on high difficulty problems.",
keywords = "Fluid intelligence, Individual differences, Multi-process, Raven's progressive matrices",
author = "Ehsan Shokri-Kojori and Krawczyk, {Daniel C.}",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "87--99",
journal = "Intelligence",
issn = "0160-2896",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Signatures of multiple processes contributing to fluid reasoning performance

AU - Shokri-Kojori, Ehsan

AU - Krawczyk, Daniel C.

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - We aimed to achieve a better understanding of the cognitive processes of fluid reasoning (or fluid intelligence; Gf), the ability to reason in novel conditions. While fluid reasoning has often been considered a unitary construct, multiple cognitive processes are expected to affect fluid reasoning performance. Yet, the contribution of various cognitive processes in fluid reasoning performance remains under-explored. We hypothesized that individual differences in fluid intelligence can be viewed as a composite of individual differences in performance in various processes of Gf. Change detection, rule verification, and rule generation were the three processes-of-interest that were additively recruited in a novel visuospatial reasoning task. We observed decreases in accuracy and increases in response time as the processing requirements increased across task conditions. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses showed that individual differences in the likelihood of success and speed of each of these processes, accounted for different aspects of individual differences in accuracy and response time in fluid reasoning performance, as measured by Raven's Progressive Matrices. Change detection was a significant contributor to performance in problems with higher visuospatial demand, however, rule verification and rule generation consistently contributed to performance for all problem types. Our findings support the position that individual differences in fluid intelligence emerge as a composite of performance on separable cognitive operations, with rule processing being important for differentiating performance on high difficulty problems.

AB - We aimed to achieve a better understanding of the cognitive processes of fluid reasoning (or fluid intelligence; Gf), the ability to reason in novel conditions. While fluid reasoning has often been considered a unitary construct, multiple cognitive processes are expected to affect fluid reasoning performance. Yet, the contribution of various cognitive processes in fluid reasoning performance remains under-explored. We hypothesized that individual differences in fluid intelligence can be viewed as a composite of individual differences in performance in various processes of Gf. Change detection, rule verification, and rule generation were the three processes-of-interest that were additively recruited in a novel visuospatial reasoning task. We observed decreases in accuracy and increases in response time as the processing requirements increased across task conditions. Hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses showed that individual differences in the likelihood of success and speed of each of these processes, accounted for different aspects of individual differences in accuracy and response time in fluid reasoning performance, as measured by Raven's Progressive Matrices. Change detection was a significant contributor to performance in problems with higher visuospatial demand, however, rule verification and rule generation consistently contributed to performance for all problem types. Our findings support the position that individual differences in fluid intelligence emerge as a composite of performance on separable cognitive operations, with rule processing being important for differentiating performance on high difficulty problems.

KW - Fluid intelligence

KW - Individual differences

KW - Multi-process

KW - Raven's progressive matrices

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044460921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044460921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.intell.2018.03.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85044460921

VL - 68

SP - 87

EP - 99

JO - Intelligence

JF - Intelligence

SN - 0160-2896

ER -