Similarity analyses of chromatographic fingerprints as tools for identification and quality control of green tea

G. Alaerts, J. Van Erps, S. Pieters, M. Dumarey, A. M. van Nederkassel, M. Goodarzi, J. Smeyers-Verbeke, Y. Vander Heyden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Similarity assessment of complex chromatographic profiles of herbal medicinal products is important as a potential tool for their identification. Mathematical similarity parameters have the advantage to be more reliable than visual similarity evaluations of often subtle differences between the fingerprint profiles. In this paper, different similarity analysis (SA) parameters are applied on green-tea chromatographic fingerprint profiles in order to test their ability to identify (dis)similar tea samples. These parameters are either based on correlation or distance measurements. They are visualised in colour maps and evaluation plots. Correlation (r) and congruence (c) coefficients are shown to provide the same information about the similarity of samples. The standardised Euclidean distance (ds) reveals less information than the Euclidean distance (de), while Mahalanobis distances (dm) are unsuitable for the similarity assessment of chromatographic fingerprints. The adapted similarity score (ss*) combines the advantages of r (or c) and de. Similarity analysis based on correlation is useful if concentration differences between samples are not important, whereas SA based on distances also detects concentration differences well. The evaluation plots including statistical confidence limits for the plotted parameter are found suitable for the evaluation of new suspected samples during quality assurance. The ss*colour maps and evaluation plots are found to be the best tools (in comparison to the other studied parameters) for the distinction between deviating and genuine fingerprints. For all studied data sets it is confirmed that adequate data pre-treatment, such as aligning the chromatograms, prior to the similarity assessment, is essential. Furthermore, green-tea samples chromatographed on two dissimilar High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) columns provided the same similarity assessment. Combining these complementary fingerprints did not improve the similarity analysis of the studied data set.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-70
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences
Volume910
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 4 2012

Fingerprint

Dermatoglyphics
Tea
Quality Control
Quality control
Color
Distance measurement
High performance liquid chromatography
Quality assurance
High Pressure Liquid Chromatography
Datasets

Keywords

  • Correlation and distance matrix
  • Fingerprint chromatography
  • Green tea
  • Quality control
  • Sample identification
  • Similarity analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Similarity analyses of chromatographic fingerprints as tools for identification and quality control of green tea. / Alaerts, G.; Van Erps, J.; Pieters, S.; Dumarey, M.; van Nederkassel, A. M.; Goodarzi, M.; Smeyers-Verbeke, J.; Vander Heyden, Y.

In: Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, Vol. 910, 04.06.2012, p. 61-70.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Alaerts, G. ; Van Erps, J. ; Pieters, S. ; Dumarey, M. ; van Nederkassel, A. M. ; Goodarzi, M. ; Smeyers-Verbeke, J. ; Vander Heyden, Y. / Similarity analyses of chromatographic fingerprints as tools for identification and quality control of green tea. In: Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences. 2012 ; Vol. 910. pp. 61-70.
@article{bf5f5000bd164dc4aa49019a19f3fee7,
title = "Similarity analyses of chromatographic fingerprints as tools for identification and quality control of green tea",
abstract = "Similarity assessment of complex chromatographic profiles of herbal medicinal products is important as a potential tool for their identification. Mathematical similarity parameters have the advantage to be more reliable than visual similarity evaluations of often subtle differences between the fingerprint profiles. In this paper, different similarity analysis (SA) parameters are applied on green-tea chromatographic fingerprint profiles in order to test their ability to identify (dis)similar tea samples. These parameters are either based on correlation or distance measurements. They are visualised in colour maps and evaluation plots. Correlation (r) and congruence (c) coefficients are shown to provide the same information about the similarity of samples. The standardised Euclidean distance (ds) reveals less information than the Euclidean distance (de), while Mahalanobis distances (dm) are unsuitable for the similarity assessment of chromatographic fingerprints. The adapted similarity score (ss*) combines the advantages of r (or c) and de. Similarity analysis based on correlation is useful if concentration differences between samples are not important, whereas SA based on distances also detects concentration differences well. The evaluation plots including statistical confidence limits for the plotted parameter are found suitable for the evaluation of new suspected samples during quality assurance. The ss*colour maps and evaluation plots are found to be the best tools (in comparison to the other studied parameters) for the distinction between deviating and genuine fingerprints. For all studied data sets it is confirmed that adequate data pre-treatment, such as aligning the chromatograms, prior to the similarity assessment, is essential. Furthermore, green-tea samples chromatographed on two dissimilar High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) columns provided the same similarity assessment. Combining these complementary fingerprints did not improve the similarity analysis of the studied data set.",
keywords = "Correlation and distance matrix, Fingerprint chromatography, Green tea, Quality control, Sample identification, Similarity analysis",
author = "G. Alaerts and {Van Erps}, J. and S. Pieters and M. Dumarey and {van Nederkassel}, {A. M.} and M. Goodarzi and J. Smeyers-Verbeke and {Vander Heyden}, Y.",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.04.031",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "910",
pages = "61--70",
journal = "Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences",
issn = "1570-0232",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Similarity analyses of chromatographic fingerprints as tools for identification and quality control of green tea

AU - Alaerts, G.

AU - Van Erps, J.

AU - Pieters, S.

AU - Dumarey, M.

AU - van Nederkassel, A. M.

AU - Goodarzi, M.

AU - Smeyers-Verbeke, J.

AU - Vander Heyden, Y.

PY - 2012/6/4

Y1 - 2012/6/4

N2 - Similarity assessment of complex chromatographic profiles of herbal medicinal products is important as a potential tool for their identification. Mathematical similarity parameters have the advantage to be more reliable than visual similarity evaluations of often subtle differences between the fingerprint profiles. In this paper, different similarity analysis (SA) parameters are applied on green-tea chromatographic fingerprint profiles in order to test their ability to identify (dis)similar tea samples. These parameters are either based on correlation or distance measurements. They are visualised in colour maps and evaluation plots. Correlation (r) and congruence (c) coefficients are shown to provide the same information about the similarity of samples. The standardised Euclidean distance (ds) reveals less information than the Euclidean distance (de), while Mahalanobis distances (dm) are unsuitable for the similarity assessment of chromatographic fingerprints. The adapted similarity score (ss*) combines the advantages of r (or c) and de. Similarity analysis based on correlation is useful if concentration differences between samples are not important, whereas SA based on distances also detects concentration differences well. The evaluation plots including statistical confidence limits for the plotted parameter are found suitable for the evaluation of new suspected samples during quality assurance. The ss*colour maps and evaluation plots are found to be the best tools (in comparison to the other studied parameters) for the distinction between deviating and genuine fingerprints. For all studied data sets it is confirmed that adequate data pre-treatment, such as aligning the chromatograms, prior to the similarity assessment, is essential. Furthermore, green-tea samples chromatographed on two dissimilar High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) columns provided the same similarity assessment. Combining these complementary fingerprints did not improve the similarity analysis of the studied data set.

AB - Similarity assessment of complex chromatographic profiles of herbal medicinal products is important as a potential tool for their identification. Mathematical similarity parameters have the advantage to be more reliable than visual similarity evaluations of often subtle differences between the fingerprint profiles. In this paper, different similarity analysis (SA) parameters are applied on green-tea chromatographic fingerprint profiles in order to test their ability to identify (dis)similar tea samples. These parameters are either based on correlation or distance measurements. They are visualised in colour maps and evaluation plots. Correlation (r) and congruence (c) coefficients are shown to provide the same information about the similarity of samples. The standardised Euclidean distance (ds) reveals less information than the Euclidean distance (de), while Mahalanobis distances (dm) are unsuitable for the similarity assessment of chromatographic fingerprints. The adapted similarity score (ss*) combines the advantages of r (or c) and de. Similarity analysis based on correlation is useful if concentration differences between samples are not important, whereas SA based on distances also detects concentration differences well. The evaluation plots including statistical confidence limits for the plotted parameter are found suitable for the evaluation of new suspected samples during quality assurance. The ss*colour maps and evaluation plots are found to be the best tools (in comparison to the other studied parameters) for the distinction between deviating and genuine fingerprints. For all studied data sets it is confirmed that adequate data pre-treatment, such as aligning the chromatograms, prior to the similarity assessment, is essential. Furthermore, green-tea samples chromatographed on two dissimilar High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) columns provided the same similarity assessment. Combining these complementary fingerprints did not improve the similarity analysis of the studied data set.

KW - Correlation and distance matrix

KW - Fingerprint chromatography

KW - Green tea

KW - Quality control

KW - Sample identification

KW - Similarity analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870238366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870238366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.04.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jchromb.2012.04.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 22672846

AN - SCOPUS:84870238366

VL - 910

SP - 61

EP - 70

JO - Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences

JF - Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences

SN - 1570-0232

ER -