Skin marker placement by technologist prior to knee MRI helps identify clinically relevant pathologies

Vibhor Wadhwa, Eric Weissman, Daichi Hayashi, Yin Xi, Avneesh Chhabra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Majority of musculoskeletal cross-sectional imaging requests have a non-revealing and non-specific clinical history of pain. However, the location of pain is very relevant towards arriving at a specific orthopedic diagnosis. The purpose of this research was to study the impact of skin marker placement and training of technologists prior to knee MRI in detection of clinically important findings. Methods: Total 200 consecutive left knee MRIs were evaluated before and after technologist training with regards to marker placement at the site of clinical symptoms or palpable finding. Marker location in relation to the knee was recorded and important findings were classified as correlated important finding, non-correlated important finding, other compartment important finding in non-correlated cases, and diffuse abnormality, i.e. tri-compartmental cartilage defects in both correlated and non-correlated cases. Differences among scans before and after technologist training were analyzed. Results: The marker placement was observed in higher proportion of patients in post-training scans (78% vs 60%, p = 0.00). The most common location of the marker was in anterior or anterolateral knee (32% and 34% cases, respectively). The marker-important finding correlation was also higher post training, but not statistically significant (53% versus 38%, p = 0.57). Important findings correlated with the marker in more than 50% of the scans in the post-training set. Conclusion: Marker placement can aid in detection of clinically important imaging finding and technologist training aids in increased rates of marker placement and improved correlation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number530
JournalBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 15 2017

Fingerprint

Knee
Pathology
Skin
Pain
Cartilage
Orthopedics
Research

Keywords

  • Cartilage defect
  • Knee MRI
  • Ligament tear
  • Meniscus tear
  • MRI skin marker

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Skin marker placement by technologist prior to knee MRI helps identify clinically relevant pathologies. / Wadhwa, Vibhor; Weissman, Eric; Hayashi, Daichi; Xi, Yin; Chhabra, Avneesh.

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 18, No. 1, 530, 15.12.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa6b7c5fed794f80ba81149038323b55,
title = "Skin marker placement by technologist prior to knee MRI helps identify clinically relevant pathologies",
abstract = "Background: Majority of musculoskeletal cross-sectional imaging requests have a non-revealing and non-specific clinical history of pain. However, the location of pain is very relevant towards arriving at a specific orthopedic diagnosis. The purpose of this research was to study the impact of skin marker placement and training of technologists prior to knee MRI in detection of clinically important findings. Methods: Total 200 consecutive left knee MRIs were evaluated before and after technologist training with regards to marker placement at the site of clinical symptoms or palpable finding. Marker location in relation to the knee was recorded and important findings were classified as correlated important finding, non-correlated important finding, other compartment important finding in non-correlated cases, and diffuse abnormality, i.e. tri-compartmental cartilage defects in both correlated and non-correlated cases. Differences among scans before and after technologist training were analyzed. Results: The marker placement was observed in higher proportion of patients in post-training scans (78{\%} vs 60{\%}, p = 0.00). The most common location of the marker was in anterior or anterolateral knee (32{\%} and 34{\%} cases, respectively). The marker-important finding correlation was also higher post training, but not statistically significant (53{\%} versus 38{\%}, p = 0.57). Important findings correlated with the marker in more than 50{\%} of the scans in the post-training set. Conclusion: Marker placement can aid in detection of clinically important imaging finding and technologist training aids in increased rates of marker placement and improved correlation.",
keywords = "Cartilage defect, Knee MRI, Ligament tear, Meniscus tear, MRI skin marker",
author = "Vibhor Wadhwa and Eric Weissman and Daichi Hayashi and Yin Xi and Avneesh Chhabra",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1186/s12891-017-1876-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skin marker placement by technologist prior to knee MRI helps identify clinically relevant pathologies

AU - Wadhwa, Vibhor

AU - Weissman, Eric

AU - Hayashi, Daichi

AU - Xi, Yin

AU - Chhabra, Avneesh

PY - 2017/12/15

Y1 - 2017/12/15

N2 - Background: Majority of musculoskeletal cross-sectional imaging requests have a non-revealing and non-specific clinical history of pain. However, the location of pain is very relevant towards arriving at a specific orthopedic diagnosis. The purpose of this research was to study the impact of skin marker placement and training of technologists prior to knee MRI in detection of clinically important findings. Methods: Total 200 consecutive left knee MRIs were evaluated before and after technologist training with regards to marker placement at the site of clinical symptoms or palpable finding. Marker location in relation to the knee was recorded and important findings were classified as correlated important finding, non-correlated important finding, other compartment important finding in non-correlated cases, and diffuse abnormality, i.e. tri-compartmental cartilage defects in both correlated and non-correlated cases. Differences among scans before and after technologist training were analyzed. Results: The marker placement was observed in higher proportion of patients in post-training scans (78% vs 60%, p = 0.00). The most common location of the marker was in anterior or anterolateral knee (32% and 34% cases, respectively). The marker-important finding correlation was also higher post training, but not statistically significant (53% versus 38%, p = 0.57). Important findings correlated with the marker in more than 50% of the scans in the post-training set. Conclusion: Marker placement can aid in detection of clinically important imaging finding and technologist training aids in increased rates of marker placement and improved correlation.

AB - Background: Majority of musculoskeletal cross-sectional imaging requests have a non-revealing and non-specific clinical history of pain. However, the location of pain is very relevant towards arriving at a specific orthopedic diagnosis. The purpose of this research was to study the impact of skin marker placement and training of technologists prior to knee MRI in detection of clinically important findings. Methods: Total 200 consecutive left knee MRIs were evaluated before and after technologist training with regards to marker placement at the site of clinical symptoms or palpable finding. Marker location in relation to the knee was recorded and important findings were classified as correlated important finding, non-correlated important finding, other compartment important finding in non-correlated cases, and diffuse abnormality, i.e. tri-compartmental cartilage defects in both correlated and non-correlated cases. Differences among scans before and after technologist training were analyzed. Results: The marker placement was observed in higher proportion of patients in post-training scans (78% vs 60%, p = 0.00). The most common location of the marker was in anterior or anterolateral knee (32% and 34% cases, respectively). The marker-important finding correlation was also higher post training, but not statistically significant (53% versus 38%, p = 0.57). Important findings correlated with the marker in more than 50% of the scans in the post-training set. Conclusion: Marker placement can aid in detection of clinically important imaging finding and technologist training aids in increased rates of marker placement and improved correlation.

KW - Cartilage defect

KW - Knee MRI

KW - Ligament tear

KW - Meniscus tear

KW - MRI skin marker

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038107938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038107938&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12891-017-1876-7

DO - 10.1186/s12891-017-1876-7

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 1471-2474

IS - 1

M1 - 530

ER -