Small nodules detected on chest radiography: Does size predict calcification?

L. Ketai, M. Malby, K. Jordan, A. Meholic, J. Locken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objectives: To determine whether the likelihood of lung nodule calcification can be predicted from nodule size as measured on a chest radiograph (CXR). Design: Retrospective review of CXRs of patients with lung nodules ≤ 1 cm in size detected on CT scanning. CT images were used to identify calcifications and to provide spatial localization for readers to visualize nodules on a CXR and to measure their size. A subset of these nodules then was reexamined by different readers who did not view the CT scans. Setting: Two university hospitals (Albuquerque, NM; Dallas, TX) and a US Air Force/Veterans Administration medical center (Albuquerque, NM). Patients: Two hundred thirty-six nodules in 185 patients. Results: One half of the nodules (118) seen on CT scans could not be located on CXR, of which 8 (7%) were calcified. The prevalence of calcifications in the other 118 nodules visualized on CXRs was much higher (71 of 118 nodules [60%]; p < 0.005). Among the nodules visualized on CXRs, those < 7 mm in diameter (44 of 57 nodules [77%]) were more likely to be calcified than those ≥ 7 mm in diameter (27 of 61 nodules [44%]; p < 0.005). Radiographs of 42 of the smallest nodules visualized on CXRs by the initial readers later were examined prospectively by different readers who did not have access to the CT images. Thirty of 33 of the calcified nodules (91%) but only 3 of 9 of the noncalcified nodules (33%) were detected (p < 0.005). These readers also recorded 40 additional small nodules that were not seen on CT scans, which were considered to be false-positives. Conclusions: Nodules detected on CXRs that measure < 7 mm in size are likely to be calcified or to represent a false-positive finding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)610-614
Number of pages5
JournalChest
Volume118
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000

Fingerprint

Radiography
Thorax
Lung
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Air

Keywords

  • Calcinosis
  • Coin lesion
  • CT
  • Lung neoplasm
  • Pulmonary
  • Radiography
  • Tung radiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Ketai, L., Malby, M., Jordan, K., Meholic, A., & Locken, J. (2000). Small nodules detected on chest radiography: Does size predict calcification? Chest, 118(3), 610-614.

Small nodules detected on chest radiography : Does size predict calcification? / Ketai, L.; Malby, M.; Jordan, K.; Meholic, A.; Locken, J.

In: Chest, Vol. 118, No. 3, 2000, p. 610-614.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ketai, L, Malby, M, Jordan, K, Meholic, A & Locken, J 2000, 'Small nodules detected on chest radiography: Does size predict calcification?', Chest, vol. 118, no. 3, pp. 610-614.
Ketai L, Malby M, Jordan K, Meholic A, Locken J. Small nodules detected on chest radiography: Does size predict calcification? Chest. 2000;118(3):610-614.
Ketai, L. ; Malby, M. ; Jordan, K. ; Meholic, A. ; Locken, J. / Small nodules detected on chest radiography : Does size predict calcification?. In: Chest. 2000 ; Vol. 118, No. 3. pp. 610-614.
@article{450fe8d77d6b4cad8be3d072bbcecdf9,
title = "Small nodules detected on chest radiography: Does size predict calcification?",
abstract = "Study objectives: To determine whether the likelihood of lung nodule calcification can be predicted from nodule size as measured on a chest radiograph (CXR). Design: Retrospective review of CXRs of patients with lung nodules ≤ 1 cm in size detected on CT scanning. CT images were used to identify calcifications and to provide spatial localization for readers to visualize nodules on a CXR and to measure their size. A subset of these nodules then was reexamined by different readers who did not view the CT scans. Setting: Two university hospitals (Albuquerque, NM; Dallas, TX) and a US Air Force/Veterans Administration medical center (Albuquerque, NM). Patients: Two hundred thirty-six nodules in 185 patients. Results: One half of the nodules (118) seen on CT scans could not be located on CXR, of which 8 (7{\%}) were calcified. The prevalence of calcifications in the other 118 nodules visualized on CXRs was much higher (71 of 118 nodules [60{\%}]; p < 0.005). Among the nodules visualized on CXRs, those < 7 mm in diameter (44 of 57 nodules [77{\%}]) were more likely to be calcified than those ≥ 7 mm in diameter (27 of 61 nodules [44{\%}]; p < 0.005). Radiographs of 42 of the smallest nodules visualized on CXRs by the initial readers later were examined prospectively by different readers who did not have access to the CT images. Thirty of 33 of the calcified nodules (91{\%}) but only 3 of 9 of the noncalcified nodules (33{\%}) were detected (p < 0.005). These readers also recorded 40 additional small nodules that were not seen on CT scans, which were considered to be false-positives. Conclusions: Nodules detected on CXRs that measure < 7 mm in size are likely to be calcified or to represent a false-positive finding.",
keywords = "Calcinosis, Coin lesion, CT, Lung neoplasm, Pulmonary, Radiography, Tung radiology",
author = "L. Ketai and M. Malby and K. Jordan and A. Meholic and J. Locken",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "118",
pages = "610--614",
journal = "Chest",
issn = "0012-3692",
publisher = "American College of Chest Physicians",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Small nodules detected on chest radiography

T2 - Does size predict calcification?

AU - Ketai, L.

AU - Malby, M.

AU - Jordan, K.

AU - Meholic, A.

AU - Locken, J.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Study objectives: To determine whether the likelihood of lung nodule calcification can be predicted from nodule size as measured on a chest radiograph (CXR). Design: Retrospective review of CXRs of patients with lung nodules ≤ 1 cm in size detected on CT scanning. CT images were used to identify calcifications and to provide spatial localization for readers to visualize nodules on a CXR and to measure their size. A subset of these nodules then was reexamined by different readers who did not view the CT scans. Setting: Two university hospitals (Albuquerque, NM; Dallas, TX) and a US Air Force/Veterans Administration medical center (Albuquerque, NM). Patients: Two hundred thirty-six nodules in 185 patients. Results: One half of the nodules (118) seen on CT scans could not be located on CXR, of which 8 (7%) were calcified. The prevalence of calcifications in the other 118 nodules visualized on CXRs was much higher (71 of 118 nodules [60%]; p < 0.005). Among the nodules visualized on CXRs, those < 7 mm in diameter (44 of 57 nodules [77%]) were more likely to be calcified than those ≥ 7 mm in diameter (27 of 61 nodules [44%]; p < 0.005). Radiographs of 42 of the smallest nodules visualized on CXRs by the initial readers later were examined prospectively by different readers who did not have access to the CT images. Thirty of 33 of the calcified nodules (91%) but only 3 of 9 of the noncalcified nodules (33%) were detected (p < 0.005). These readers also recorded 40 additional small nodules that were not seen on CT scans, which were considered to be false-positives. Conclusions: Nodules detected on CXRs that measure < 7 mm in size are likely to be calcified or to represent a false-positive finding.

AB - Study objectives: To determine whether the likelihood of lung nodule calcification can be predicted from nodule size as measured on a chest radiograph (CXR). Design: Retrospective review of CXRs of patients with lung nodules ≤ 1 cm in size detected on CT scanning. CT images were used to identify calcifications and to provide spatial localization for readers to visualize nodules on a CXR and to measure their size. A subset of these nodules then was reexamined by different readers who did not view the CT scans. Setting: Two university hospitals (Albuquerque, NM; Dallas, TX) and a US Air Force/Veterans Administration medical center (Albuquerque, NM). Patients: Two hundred thirty-six nodules in 185 patients. Results: One half of the nodules (118) seen on CT scans could not be located on CXR, of which 8 (7%) were calcified. The prevalence of calcifications in the other 118 nodules visualized on CXRs was much higher (71 of 118 nodules [60%]; p < 0.005). Among the nodules visualized on CXRs, those < 7 mm in diameter (44 of 57 nodules [77%]) were more likely to be calcified than those ≥ 7 mm in diameter (27 of 61 nodules [44%]; p < 0.005). Radiographs of 42 of the smallest nodules visualized on CXRs by the initial readers later were examined prospectively by different readers who did not have access to the CT images. Thirty of 33 of the calcified nodules (91%) but only 3 of 9 of the noncalcified nodules (33%) were detected (p < 0.005). These readers also recorded 40 additional small nodules that were not seen on CT scans, which were considered to be false-positives. Conclusions: Nodules detected on CXRs that measure < 7 mm in size are likely to be calcified or to represent a false-positive finding.

KW - Calcinosis

KW - Coin lesion

KW - CT

KW - Lung neoplasm

KW - Pulmonary

KW - Radiography

KW - Tung radiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033805993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033805993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10988180

AN - SCOPUS:0033805993

VL - 118

SP - 610

EP - 614

JO - Chest

JF - Chest

SN - 0012-3692

IS - 3

ER -