Stereotactic body radiation therapy: Evaluation of setup accuracy and targeting methods for a new couch integrated immobilization system

John H. Heinzerling, Lech Papiez, Stanley Chien, John Anderson, Kenneth Forster, Geoffrey Zhang, Robert Timmerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new stereotactic frame system was designed at Indiana University to utilize the precision motion control of newer accelerator couches and treat obese patients previously untreatable in other frame systems during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The repositioning accuracy and target reproducibility of this frame was evaluated in the treatment of both lung and liver tumors. The external coordinate system on the new frame was validated using a phantom system. Translational motions were carried out using couch motors. Five patients were treated with SBRT and twenty-three verification CT scans were acquired. The displacement of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and adjacent vertebral body between the original CT scan and the verification CT scans was determined. The mean setup accuracy for the patient study was less than 5 mm. Mean displacement of the GTV was 3.0 mm (0.0-6.0 mm) in the lateral (x) direction, 4.1 mm (0.0-8.9 mm) in the superior-inferior (y) direction, and 2.6 mm (0.0-10.0 mm) in the cranio-caudal (z) direction. Comparison of vertebral body position showed mean displacement of 2.4 mm (0.0 to 8.0 mm), 1.9 mm (0.0 mm to 2.0 mm), and 0.9 mm (0.0 to 5.0 mm) for the same shift directions. Repositioning could be accurately carried out from an initial reference position using the treatment couch controllers. Adequate set-up accuracy using a frame system capable of accommodating wide girth patients was achieved and was comparable to other published studies for narrower frames. With these results, a 5 mm expansion for PTV margins remains the standard for our institution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-206
Number of pages10
JournalTechnology in Cancer Research and Treatment
Volume7
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

Immobilization
Radiotherapy
Tumor Burden
Lung
Direction compound
Liver
Therapeutics
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Abdominal compression
  • Body frame
  • Immobilization
  • Radiosurgery
  • Stereotactic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Stereotactic body radiation therapy : Evaluation of setup accuracy and targeting methods for a new couch integrated immobilization system. / Heinzerling, John H.; Papiez, Lech; Chien, Stanley; Anderson, John; Forster, Kenneth; Zhang, Geoffrey; Timmerman, Robert.

In: Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Vol. 7, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 197-206.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heinzerling, John H. ; Papiez, Lech ; Chien, Stanley ; Anderson, John ; Forster, Kenneth ; Zhang, Geoffrey ; Timmerman, Robert. / Stereotactic body radiation therapy : Evaluation of setup accuracy and targeting methods for a new couch integrated immobilization system. In: Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment. 2008 ; Vol. 7, No. 3. pp. 197-206.
@article{860ae3ffee074851b9f3886ea467b571,
title = "Stereotactic body radiation therapy: Evaluation of setup accuracy and targeting methods for a new couch integrated immobilization system",
abstract = "A new stereotactic frame system was designed at Indiana University to utilize the precision motion control of newer accelerator couches and treat obese patients previously untreatable in other frame systems during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The repositioning accuracy and target reproducibility of this frame was evaluated in the treatment of both lung and liver tumors. The external coordinate system on the new frame was validated using a phantom system. Translational motions were carried out using couch motors. Five patients were treated with SBRT and twenty-three verification CT scans were acquired. The displacement of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and adjacent vertebral body between the original CT scan and the verification CT scans was determined. The mean setup accuracy for the patient study was less than 5 mm. Mean displacement of the GTV was 3.0 mm (0.0-6.0 mm) in the lateral (x) direction, 4.1 mm (0.0-8.9 mm) in the superior-inferior (y) direction, and 2.6 mm (0.0-10.0 mm) in the cranio-caudal (z) direction. Comparison of vertebral body position showed mean displacement of 2.4 mm (0.0 to 8.0 mm), 1.9 mm (0.0 mm to 2.0 mm), and 0.9 mm (0.0 to 5.0 mm) for the same shift directions. Repositioning could be accurately carried out from an initial reference position using the treatment couch controllers. Adequate set-up accuracy using a frame system capable of accommodating wide girth patients was achieved and was comparable to other published studies for narrower frames. With these results, a 5 mm expansion for PTV margins remains the standard for our institution.",
keywords = "Abdominal compression, Body frame, Immobilization, Radiosurgery, Stereotactic",
author = "Heinzerling, {John H.} and Lech Papiez and Stanley Chien and John Anderson and Kenneth Forster and Geoffrey Zhang and Robert Timmerman",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "197--206",
journal = "Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment",
issn = "1533-0346",
publisher = "Adenine Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stereotactic body radiation therapy

T2 - Evaluation of setup accuracy and targeting methods for a new couch integrated immobilization system

AU - Heinzerling, John H.

AU - Papiez, Lech

AU - Chien, Stanley

AU - Anderson, John

AU - Forster, Kenneth

AU - Zhang, Geoffrey

AU - Timmerman, Robert

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - A new stereotactic frame system was designed at Indiana University to utilize the precision motion control of newer accelerator couches and treat obese patients previously untreatable in other frame systems during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The repositioning accuracy and target reproducibility of this frame was evaluated in the treatment of both lung and liver tumors. The external coordinate system on the new frame was validated using a phantom system. Translational motions were carried out using couch motors. Five patients were treated with SBRT and twenty-three verification CT scans were acquired. The displacement of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and adjacent vertebral body between the original CT scan and the verification CT scans was determined. The mean setup accuracy for the patient study was less than 5 mm. Mean displacement of the GTV was 3.0 mm (0.0-6.0 mm) in the lateral (x) direction, 4.1 mm (0.0-8.9 mm) in the superior-inferior (y) direction, and 2.6 mm (0.0-10.0 mm) in the cranio-caudal (z) direction. Comparison of vertebral body position showed mean displacement of 2.4 mm (0.0 to 8.0 mm), 1.9 mm (0.0 mm to 2.0 mm), and 0.9 mm (0.0 to 5.0 mm) for the same shift directions. Repositioning could be accurately carried out from an initial reference position using the treatment couch controllers. Adequate set-up accuracy using a frame system capable of accommodating wide girth patients was achieved and was comparable to other published studies for narrower frames. With these results, a 5 mm expansion for PTV margins remains the standard for our institution.

AB - A new stereotactic frame system was designed at Indiana University to utilize the precision motion control of newer accelerator couches and treat obese patients previously untreatable in other frame systems during stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The repositioning accuracy and target reproducibility of this frame was evaluated in the treatment of both lung and liver tumors. The external coordinate system on the new frame was validated using a phantom system. Translational motions were carried out using couch motors. Five patients were treated with SBRT and twenty-three verification CT scans were acquired. The displacement of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and adjacent vertebral body between the original CT scan and the verification CT scans was determined. The mean setup accuracy for the patient study was less than 5 mm. Mean displacement of the GTV was 3.0 mm (0.0-6.0 mm) in the lateral (x) direction, 4.1 mm (0.0-8.9 mm) in the superior-inferior (y) direction, and 2.6 mm (0.0-10.0 mm) in the cranio-caudal (z) direction. Comparison of vertebral body position showed mean displacement of 2.4 mm (0.0 to 8.0 mm), 1.9 mm (0.0 mm to 2.0 mm), and 0.9 mm (0.0 to 5.0 mm) for the same shift directions. Repositioning could be accurately carried out from an initial reference position using the treatment couch controllers. Adequate set-up accuracy using a frame system capable of accommodating wide girth patients was achieved and was comparable to other published studies for narrower frames. With these results, a 5 mm expansion for PTV margins remains the standard for our institution.

KW - Abdominal compression

KW - Body frame

KW - Immobilization

KW - Radiosurgery

KW - Stereotactic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45349103334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45349103334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 18473491

AN - SCOPUS:45349103334

VL - 7

SP - 197

EP - 206

JO - Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment

JF - Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment

SN - 1533-0346

IS - 3

ER -