Stroke outcomes measures must be appropriately risk adjusted to ensure quality care of patients: A presidential advisory from the American heart association/American stroke association

Gregg C. Fonarow, Mark J. Alberts, Joseph P. Broderick, Edward C. Jauch, Dawn O. Kleindorfer, Jeffrey L. Saver, Penelope Solis, Robert Suter, Lee H. Schwamm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Because stroke is among the leading causes of death, disability, hospitalizations, and healthcare expenditures in the United States, there is interest in reporting outcomes for patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, as part of its commitment to promote high-quality, evidence-based care for cardiovascular and stroke patients, fully supports the development of properly risk-adjusted outcome measures for stroke. To accurately assess and report hospital-level outcomes, adequate risk adjustment for case mix is essential. During the development of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 30-day stroke mortality and 30-day stroke readmission measures, concerns were expressed that these measures were not adequately designed because they do not include a valid initial stroke severity measure, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. These outcome measures, as currently constructed, may be prone to mischaracterizing the quality of stroke care being delivered by hospitals and may ultimately harm acute ischemic stroke patients. This article details (1) why the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acute ischemic stroke outcome measures in their present form may not provide adequate risk adjustment, (2) why the measures as currently designed may lead to inaccurate representation of hospital performance and have the potential for serious unintended consequences, (3) what activities the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has engaged in to highlight these concerns to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other interested parties, and (4) alternative approaches and opportunities that should be considered for more accurately risk-adjusting 30-day outcomes measures in patients with ischemic stroke.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1589-1601
Number of pages13
JournalStroke
Volume45
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

American Heart Association
Quality of Health Care
Stroke
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Medicaid
Medicare
Risk Adjustment
Diagnosis-Related Groups
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Jurisprudence
Health Expenditures
Cause of Death
Hospitalization

Keywords

  • AHA Scientific Statements
  • Health policy
  • Ischemia
  • Mortality
  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Stroke

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Stroke outcomes measures must be appropriately risk adjusted to ensure quality care of patients : A presidential advisory from the American heart association/American stroke association. / Fonarow, Gregg C.; Alberts, Mark J.; Broderick, Joseph P.; Jauch, Edward C.; Kleindorfer, Dawn O.; Saver, Jeffrey L.; Solis, Penelope; Suter, Robert; Schwamm, Lee H.

In: Stroke, Vol. 45, No. 5, 2014, p. 1589-1601.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fonarow, Gregg C. ; Alberts, Mark J. ; Broderick, Joseph P. ; Jauch, Edward C. ; Kleindorfer, Dawn O. ; Saver, Jeffrey L. ; Solis, Penelope ; Suter, Robert ; Schwamm, Lee H. / Stroke outcomes measures must be appropriately risk adjusted to ensure quality care of patients : A presidential advisory from the American heart association/American stroke association. In: Stroke. 2014 ; Vol. 45, No. 5. pp. 1589-1601.
@article{8f02314016014148969b88bc4b0fa36a,
title = "Stroke outcomes measures must be appropriately risk adjusted to ensure quality care of patients: A presidential advisory from the American heart association/American stroke association",
abstract = "Because stroke is among the leading causes of death, disability, hospitalizations, and healthcare expenditures in the United States, there is interest in reporting outcomes for patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, as part of its commitment to promote high-quality, evidence-based care for cardiovascular and stroke patients, fully supports the development of properly risk-adjusted outcome measures for stroke. To accurately assess and report hospital-level outcomes, adequate risk adjustment for case mix is essential. During the development of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 30-day stroke mortality and 30-day stroke readmission measures, concerns were expressed that these measures were not adequately designed because they do not include a valid initial stroke severity measure, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. These outcome measures, as currently constructed, may be prone to mischaracterizing the quality of stroke care being delivered by hospitals and may ultimately harm acute ischemic stroke patients. This article details (1) why the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acute ischemic stroke outcome measures in their present form may not provide adequate risk adjustment, (2) why the measures as currently designed may lead to inaccurate representation of hospital performance and have the potential for serious unintended consequences, (3) what activities the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has engaged in to highlight these concerns to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other interested parties, and (4) alternative approaches and opportunities that should be considered for more accurately risk-adjusting 30-day outcomes measures in patients with ischemic stroke.",
keywords = "AHA Scientific Statements, Health policy, Ischemia, Mortality, Outcome assessment (health care), Stroke",
author = "Fonarow, {Gregg C.} and Alberts, {Mark J.} and Broderick, {Joseph P.} and Jauch, {Edward C.} and Kleindorfer, {Dawn O.} and Saver, {Jeffrey L.} and Penelope Solis and Robert Suter and Schwamm, {Lee H.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1161/STR.0000000000000014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "1589--1601",
journal = "Stroke",
issn = "0039-2499",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stroke outcomes measures must be appropriately risk adjusted to ensure quality care of patients

T2 - A presidential advisory from the American heart association/American stroke association

AU - Fonarow, Gregg C.

AU - Alberts, Mark J.

AU - Broderick, Joseph P.

AU - Jauch, Edward C.

AU - Kleindorfer, Dawn O.

AU - Saver, Jeffrey L.

AU - Solis, Penelope

AU - Suter, Robert

AU - Schwamm, Lee H.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Because stroke is among the leading causes of death, disability, hospitalizations, and healthcare expenditures in the United States, there is interest in reporting outcomes for patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, as part of its commitment to promote high-quality, evidence-based care for cardiovascular and stroke patients, fully supports the development of properly risk-adjusted outcome measures for stroke. To accurately assess and report hospital-level outcomes, adequate risk adjustment for case mix is essential. During the development of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 30-day stroke mortality and 30-day stroke readmission measures, concerns were expressed that these measures were not adequately designed because they do not include a valid initial stroke severity measure, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. These outcome measures, as currently constructed, may be prone to mischaracterizing the quality of stroke care being delivered by hospitals and may ultimately harm acute ischemic stroke patients. This article details (1) why the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acute ischemic stroke outcome measures in their present form may not provide adequate risk adjustment, (2) why the measures as currently designed may lead to inaccurate representation of hospital performance and have the potential for serious unintended consequences, (3) what activities the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has engaged in to highlight these concerns to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other interested parties, and (4) alternative approaches and opportunities that should be considered for more accurately risk-adjusting 30-day outcomes measures in patients with ischemic stroke.

AB - Because stroke is among the leading causes of death, disability, hospitalizations, and healthcare expenditures in the United States, there is interest in reporting outcomes for patients hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association, as part of its commitment to promote high-quality, evidence-based care for cardiovascular and stroke patients, fully supports the development of properly risk-adjusted outcome measures for stroke. To accurately assess and report hospital-level outcomes, adequate risk adjustment for case mix is essential. During the development of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 30-day stroke mortality and 30-day stroke readmission measures, concerns were expressed that these measures were not adequately designed because they do not include a valid initial stroke severity measure, such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. These outcome measures, as currently constructed, may be prone to mischaracterizing the quality of stroke care being delivered by hospitals and may ultimately harm acute ischemic stroke patients. This article details (1) why the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acute ischemic stroke outcome measures in their present form may not provide adequate risk adjustment, (2) why the measures as currently designed may lead to inaccurate representation of hospital performance and have the potential for serious unintended consequences, (3) what activities the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has engaged in to highlight these concerns to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and other interested parties, and (4) alternative approaches and opportunities that should be considered for more accurately risk-adjusting 30-day outcomes measures in patients with ischemic stroke.

KW - AHA Scientific Statements

KW - Health policy

KW - Ischemia

KW - Mortality

KW - Outcome assessment (health care)

KW - Stroke

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899954671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899954671&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1161/STR.0000000000000014

DO - 10.1161/STR.0000000000000014

M3 - Article

C2 - 24523036

AN - SCOPUS:84899954671

VL - 45

SP - 1589

EP - 1601

JO - Stroke

JF - Stroke

SN - 0039-2499

IS - 5

ER -