Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer

Potential effect on staging and surgical planning

Olga R. Brook, Alexander Brook, Charles M. Vollmer, Tara S. Kent, Norberto Sanchez, Ivan Pedrosa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare structured versus nonstructured reporting of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) for staging of pancreatic cancer and the effects of both types of reporting on subjective assessment of resectability. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board'approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent included all patients who were referred for presurgical multiphasic CT of the pancreas between December 2006 and April 2011 at one institution before and after implementation (April 2008) of a structured reporting template. The template was created specifically for reporting multiphasic CT results to stage pancreatic cancer in patients and contained specific information relevant to surgical and oncologic planning. Multiphasic CT reports were assessed for the presence of 12 key features required for staging and surgical planning, including location, size, enhancement, node status, and vascular involvement. Three pancreatic surgeons evaluated the reports to assess resectability, surgical planning, and ease of extracting information before and after reviewing the multiphasic CT images blinded to the patient identifiers. The Student t test and x2 test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Forty-eight (40%) structured and 72 (60%) nonstructured multiphasic CT reports were reviewed. Nonstructured reports contained a mean ± standard deviation of 7.3 key features ± 2.1 (range, 1'11) and structured reports contained 10.6 ± 0.9 (range, 9'12) features (P <.001). Information for surgical planning was deemed easily accessible in 94%, 60%, and 98% of structured and 47%, 54%, and 32% of nonstructured reports by the three surgeons, respectively (P <.001<.79, <.001). Surgeons had suffi-cient information for surgical planning in 96%, 69%, and 98% of structured and 31%, 43%, and 25% of nonstructured reports (P <.001<.009, and <.001). When surgeons reviewed reports in combination with multiphasic CT images, they were more likely to convert an answer of "unsure" regarding resectability to a definitive answer (ie, resectable or unresectable) when the reports were structured than when they were nonstructured. Conclusion: Structured reporting of pancreatic multiphasic CT provided superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer and facilitated surgical planning. Surgeons were more confident regarding decisions about tumor resectability when they reviewed structured reports before review of multiphasic CT images.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)464-472
Number of pages9
JournalRadiology
Volume274
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Pancreatic Neoplasms
Tomography
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act
Research Ethics Committees
Informed Consent
Blood Vessels
Pancreas
Retrospective Studies
Surgeons
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Brook, O. R., Brook, A., Vollmer, C. M., Kent, T. S., Sanchez, N., & Pedrosa, I. (2015). Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: Potential effect on staging and surgical planning. Radiology, 274(2), 464-472.

Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer : Potential effect on staging and surgical planning. / Brook, Olga R.; Brook, Alexander; Vollmer, Charles M.; Kent, Tara S.; Sanchez, Norberto; Pedrosa, Ivan.

In: Radiology, Vol. 274, No. 2, 01.01.2015, p. 464-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brook, OR, Brook, A, Vollmer, CM, Kent, TS, Sanchez, N & Pedrosa, I 2015, 'Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: Potential effect on staging and surgical planning', Radiology, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 464-472.
Brook, Olga R. ; Brook, Alexander ; Vollmer, Charles M. ; Kent, Tara S. ; Sanchez, Norberto ; Pedrosa, Ivan. / Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer : Potential effect on staging and surgical planning. In: Radiology. 2015 ; Vol. 274, No. 2. pp. 464-472.
@article{f577510ab9374aeead47dd3a0fd148bc,
title = "Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer: Potential effect on staging and surgical planning",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare structured versus nonstructured reporting of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) for staging of pancreatic cancer and the effects of both types of reporting on subjective assessment of resectability. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board'approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent included all patients who were referred for presurgical multiphasic CT of the pancreas between December 2006 and April 2011 at one institution before and after implementation (April 2008) of a structured reporting template. The template was created specifically for reporting multiphasic CT results to stage pancreatic cancer in patients and contained specific information relevant to surgical and oncologic planning. Multiphasic CT reports were assessed for the presence of 12 key features required for staging and surgical planning, including location, size, enhancement, node status, and vascular involvement. Three pancreatic surgeons evaluated the reports to assess resectability, surgical planning, and ease of extracting information before and after reviewing the multiphasic CT images blinded to the patient identifiers. The Student t test and x2 test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Forty-eight (40{\%}) structured and 72 (60{\%}) nonstructured multiphasic CT reports were reviewed. Nonstructured reports contained a mean ± standard deviation of 7.3 key features ± 2.1 (range, 1'11) and structured reports contained 10.6 ± 0.9 (range, 9'12) features (P <.001). Information for surgical planning was deemed easily accessible in 94{\%}, 60{\%}, and 98{\%} of structured and 47{\%}, 54{\%}, and 32{\%} of nonstructured reports by the three surgeons, respectively (P <.001<.79, <.001). Surgeons had suffi-cient information for surgical planning in 96{\%}, 69{\%}, and 98{\%} of structured and 31{\%}, 43{\%}, and 25{\%} of nonstructured reports (P <.001<.009, and <.001). When surgeons reviewed reports in combination with multiphasic CT images, they were more likely to convert an answer of {"}unsure{"} regarding resectability to a definitive answer (ie, resectable or unresectable) when the reports were structured than when they were nonstructured. Conclusion: Structured reporting of pancreatic multiphasic CT provided superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer and facilitated surgical planning. Surgeons were more confident regarding decisions about tumor resectability when they reviewed structured reports before review of multiphasic CT images.",
author = "Brook, {Olga R.} and Alexander Brook and Vollmer, {Charles M.} and Kent, {Tara S.} and Norberto Sanchez and Ivan Pedrosa",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "274",
pages = "464--472",
journal = "Radiology",
issn = "0033-8419",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Structured reporting of multiphasic CT for pancreatic cancer

T2 - Potential effect on staging and surgical planning

AU - Brook, Olga R.

AU - Brook, Alexander

AU - Vollmer, Charles M.

AU - Kent, Tara S.

AU - Sanchez, Norberto

AU - Pedrosa, Ivan

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To compare structured versus nonstructured reporting of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) for staging of pancreatic cancer and the effects of both types of reporting on subjective assessment of resectability. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board'approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent included all patients who were referred for presurgical multiphasic CT of the pancreas between December 2006 and April 2011 at one institution before and after implementation (April 2008) of a structured reporting template. The template was created specifically for reporting multiphasic CT results to stage pancreatic cancer in patients and contained specific information relevant to surgical and oncologic planning. Multiphasic CT reports were assessed for the presence of 12 key features required for staging and surgical planning, including location, size, enhancement, node status, and vascular involvement. Three pancreatic surgeons evaluated the reports to assess resectability, surgical planning, and ease of extracting information before and after reviewing the multiphasic CT images blinded to the patient identifiers. The Student t test and x2 test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Forty-eight (40%) structured and 72 (60%) nonstructured multiphasic CT reports were reviewed. Nonstructured reports contained a mean ± standard deviation of 7.3 key features ± 2.1 (range, 1'11) and structured reports contained 10.6 ± 0.9 (range, 9'12) features (P <.001). Information for surgical planning was deemed easily accessible in 94%, 60%, and 98% of structured and 47%, 54%, and 32% of nonstructured reports by the three surgeons, respectively (P <.001<.79, <.001). Surgeons had suffi-cient information for surgical planning in 96%, 69%, and 98% of structured and 31%, 43%, and 25% of nonstructured reports (P <.001<.009, and <.001). When surgeons reviewed reports in combination with multiphasic CT images, they were more likely to convert an answer of "unsure" regarding resectability to a definitive answer (ie, resectable or unresectable) when the reports were structured than when they were nonstructured. Conclusion: Structured reporting of pancreatic multiphasic CT provided superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer and facilitated surgical planning. Surgeons were more confident regarding decisions about tumor resectability when they reviewed structured reports before review of multiphasic CT images.

AB - Purpose: To compare structured versus nonstructured reporting of multiphasic computed tomography (CT) for staging of pancreatic cancer and the effects of both types of reporting on subjective assessment of resectability. Materials and Methods: This institutional review board'approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent included all patients who were referred for presurgical multiphasic CT of the pancreas between December 2006 and April 2011 at one institution before and after implementation (April 2008) of a structured reporting template. The template was created specifically for reporting multiphasic CT results to stage pancreatic cancer in patients and contained specific information relevant to surgical and oncologic planning. Multiphasic CT reports were assessed for the presence of 12 key features required for staging and surgical planning, including location, size, enhancement, node status, and vascular involvement. Three pancreatic surgeons evaluated the reports to assess resectability, surgical planning, and ease of extracting information before and after reviewing the multiphasic CT images blinded to the patient identifiers. The Student t test and x2 test were used for statistical analysis. Results: Forty-eight (40%) structured and 72 (60%) nonstructured multiphasic CT reports were reviewed. Nonstructured reports contained a mean ± standard deviation of 7.3 key features ± 2.1 (range, 1'11) and structured reports contained 10.6 ± 0.9 (range, 9'12) features (P <.001). Information for surgical planning was deemed easily accessible in 94%, 60%, and 98% of structured and 47%, 54%, and 32% of nonstructured reports by the three surgeons, respectively (P <.001<.79, <.001). Surgeons had suffi-cient information for surgical planning in 96%, 69%, and 98% of structured and 31%, 43%, and 25% of nonstructured reports (P <.001<.009, and <.001). When surgeons reviewed reports in combination with multiphasic CT images, they were more likely to convert an answer of "unsure" regarding resectability to a definitive answer (ie, resectable or unresectable) when the reports were structured than when they were nonstructured. Conclusion: Structured reporting of pancreatic multiphasic CT provided superior evaluation of pancreatic cancer and facilitated surgical planning. Surgeons were more confident regarding decisions about tumor resectability when they reviewed structured reports before review of multiphasic CT images.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921781936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921781936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 274

SP - 464

EP - 472

JO - Radiology

JF - Radiology

SN - 0033-8419

IS - 2

ER -