Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes: A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons

Liyang Tang, Andrew T. Day, Rebecca Lee, Eli Gordin, Kevin Emerick, Urjeet A. Patel, Daniel G. Deschler, Jeremy D. Richmon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon submental flap (SMF) practice patterns and to evaluate variables associated with SMF complications. Methods: The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between 11/11/16 and 12/31/16. Surgeon demographics, training, practice patterns and techniques were characterized and evaluated for associations with frequency of SMF complications. Results: Among 212 AHNS surgeons, 108 (50.9%) reported performing SMFs, of whom 86 provided complete responses. Most surgeons who performed the SMF routinely reconstructed oral cavity defects with the flap (86.1%, n = 74). Thirty-seven surgeons (43.0%) experienced “very few” complications with the SMF. Surgeons who practiced in the United States versus internationally (p = 0.003), performed more total career SMFs (p = 0.02), and routinely reconstructed parotid and oropharyngeal defects (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001) with SMFs were more frequently perceived to have “very few” complications. SMF surgeons reported more perceived complications with the SMF compared to pectoralis major (p = 0.001) and radial forearm free flaps (p = 0.01). However, similar perceived complications were reported between all three flaps when surgeons performed >30 SMF. Among 94 surgeons not performing SMFs, 71.3% had interest in a SMF training course. Conclusions: Practice patterns of surgeons performing SMFs are diverse, although most use the flap for oral cavity reconstruction. While 43% of surgeons performing the SMF reported “very few” complications, overall complication rates with the SMF were higher compared to other flaps, potentially due to limited experience with the SMF. Increased training opportunities in SMF harvest and inset are indicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number102291
JournalAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery
Volume41
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2020

Fingerprint

Neck
Mouth
Surgeons
Surveys and Questionnaires
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography

Keywords

  • Pectoralis major flap
  • Radial forearm free flap
  • Submental flap

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes : A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons. / Tang, Liyang; Day, Andrew T.; Lee, Rebecca; Gordin, Eli; Emerick, Kevin; Patel, Urjeet A.; Deschler, Daniel G.; Richmon, Jeremy D.

In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery, Vol. 41, No. 1, 102291, 01.01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tang, Liyang ; Day, Andrew T. ; Lee, Rebecca ; Gordin, Eli ; Emerick, Kevin ; Patel, Urjeet A. ; Deschler, Daniel G. ; Richmon, Jeremy D. / Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes : A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons. In: American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery. 2020 ; Vol. 41, No. 1.
@article{a5deaf4245dd4c56b3a75c1fffd74630,
title = "Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes: A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons",
abstract = "Objectives: To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon submental flap (SMF) practice patterns and to evaluate variables associated with SMF complications. Methods: The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between 11/11/16 and 12/31/16. Surgeon demographics, training, practice patterns and techniques were characterized and evaluated for associations with frequency of SMF complications. Results: Among 212 AHNS surgeons, 108 (50.9{\%}) reported performing SMFs, of whom 86 provided complete responses. Most surgeons who performed the SMF routinely reconstructed oral cavity defects with the flap (86.1{\%}, n = 74). Thirty-seven surgeons (43.0{\%}) experienced “very few” complications with the SMF. Surgeons who practiced in the United States versus internationally (p = 0.003), performed more total career SMFs (p = 0.02), and routinely reconstructed parotid and oropharyngeal defects (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001) with SMFs were more frequently perceived to have “very few” complications. SMF surgeons reported more perceived complications with the SMF compared to pectoralis major (p = 0.001) and radial forearm free flaps (p = 0.01). However, similar perceived complications were reported between all three flaps when surgeons performed >30 SMF. Among 94 surgeons not performing SMFs, 71.3{\%} had interest in a SMF training course. Conclusions: Practice patterns of surgeons performing SMFs are diverse, although most use the flap for oral cavity reconstruction. While 43{\%} of surgeons performing the SMF reported “very few” complications, overall complication rates with the SMF were higher compared to other flaps, potentially due to limited experience with the SMF. Increased training opportunities in SMF harvest and inset are indicated.",
keywords = "Pectoralis major flap, Radial forearm free flap, Submental flap",
author = "Liyang Tang and Day, {Andrew T.} and Rebecca Lee and Eli Gordin and Kevin Emerick and Patel, {Urjeet A.} and Deschler, {Daniel G.} and Richmon, {Jeremy D.}",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102291",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
journal = "American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery",
issn = "0196-0709",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Submental flap practice patterns and perceived outcomes

T2 - A survey of 212 AHNS surgeons

AU - Tang, Liyang

AU - Day, Andrew T.

AU - Lee, Rebecca

AU - Gordin, Eli

AU - Emerick, Kevin

AU - Patel, Urjeet A.

AU - Deschler, Daniel G.

AU - Richmon, Jeremy D.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

N2 - Objectives: To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon submental flap (SMF) practice patterns and to evaluate variables associated with SMF complications. Methods: The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between 11/11/16 and 12/31/16. Surgeon demographics, training, practice patterns and techniques were characterized and evaluated for associations with frequency of SMF complications. Results: Among 212 AHNS surgeons, 108 (50.9%) reported performing SMFs, of whom 86 provided complete responses. Most surgeons who performed the SMF routinely reconstructed oral cavity defects with the flap (86.1%, n = 74). Thirty-seven surgeons (43.0%) experienced “very few” complications with the SMF. Surgeons who practiced in the United States versus internationally (p = 0.003), performed more total career SMFs (p = 0.02), and routinely reconstructed parotid and oropharyngeal defects (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001) with SMFs were more frequently perceived to have “very few” complications. SMF surgeons reported more perceived complications with the SMF compared to pectoralis major (p = 0.001) and radial forearm free flaps (p = 0.01). However, similar perceived complications were reported between all three flaps when surgeons performed >30 SMF. Among 94 surgeons not performing SMFs, 71.3% had interest in a SMF training course. Conclusions: Practice patterns of surgeons performing SMFs are diverse, although most use the flap for oral cavity reconstruction. While 43% of surgeons performing the SMF reported “very few” complications, overall complication rates with the SMF were higher compared to other flaps, potentially due to limited experience with the SMF. Increased training opportunities in SMF harvest and inset are indicated.

AB - Objectives: To describe American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) surgeon submental flap (SMF) practice patterns and to evaluate variables associated with SMF complications. Methods: The design is a cross-sectional study. An online survey was distributed to 782 AHNS surgeons between 11/11/16 and 12/31/16. Surgeon demographics, training, practice patterns and techniques were characterized and evaluated for associations with frequency of SMF complications. Results: Among 212 AHNS surgeons, 108 (50.9%) reported performing SMFs, of whom 86 provided complete responses. Most surgeons who performed the SMF routinely reconstructed oral cavity defects with the flap (86.1%, n = 74). Thirty-seven surgeons (43.0%) experienced “very few” complications with the SMF. Surgeons who practiced in the United States versus internationally (p = 0.003), performed more total career SMFs (p = 0.02), and routinely reconstructed parotid and oropharyngeal defects (p = 0.04 and p < 0.001) with SMFs were more frequently perceived to have “very few” complications. SMF surgeons reported more perceived complications with the SMF compared to pectoralis major (p = 0.001) and radial forearm free flaps (p = 0.01). However, similar perceived complications were reported between all three flaps when surgeons performed >30 SMF. Among 94 surgeons not performing SMFs, 71.3% had interest in a SMF training course. Conclusions: Practice patterns of surgeons performing SMFs are diverse, although most use the flap for oral cavity reconstruction. While 43% of surgeons performing the SMF reported “very few” complications, overall complication rates with the SMF were higher compared to other flaps, potentially due to limited experience with the SMF. Increased training opportunities in SMF harvest and inset are indicated.

KW - Pectoralis major flap

KW - Radial forearm free flap

KW - Submental flap

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075260102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075260102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102291

DO - 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.102291

M3 - Article

C2 - 31732308

AN - SCOPUS:85075260102

VL - 41

JO - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

JF - American Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Medicine and Surgery

SN - 0196-0709

IS - 1

M1 - 102291

ER -