SU‐DD‐A2‐06: The Effect of Respiratory Rate and Radiation Timing On Dose Coverage in Dynamic Breast IMRT

C. Ding, X. li, M. Huq, C. Saw, D. Heron, N. Yue

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: IMRT has been shown to be capable of delivering plans with desirable homogeneous dose distribution for breast cancer treatment. However, the dose distribution may be influenced by interplay between dynamic MLC and respiratory motion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of respiratory rate and radiation timing on the dose distribution of breast dynamic IMRT. Method and Materials: Using similar setup configuration, a helical CT and 4DCT image sets for six breast cancer patients were collected and contoured. Dynamic IMRT plans were designed using the helical CT images. The planned MLC sequence was segmented according to the respiratory phases with a series of respiratory rates (7.5–30/min) and radiation timing (evenly distributed in respiratory cycles). The segmented dynamic MLC sequences were applied to the radiation fields on the corresponding 4DCT phases. A program was developed to calculate the cumulative dose distribution from all the phases. Results: For normal breathing rates (15–20/min), the dose coverage didn't change significantly regardless of radiation starting time. The change of target V90 was less than 2%. However, for extremely slow respiratory rates (7.5–10/min), the dose distribution and V90 changed significantly depending on the radiation timing. The change of target V90 was more than 10%. There was no significant dose coverage change for the underlying heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing. Conclusions: For breast patients treated with dynamic IMRT, if the respiratory rate of the patient is within the “normal” range then the impact of such respiration on dose coverage of the target was found to be statistically insignificant. However, the dose distribution may change significantly when patient has a slow breathing rate. Respiratory gating may be required to obtain satisfactory dose coverage for such cases. There was no significant dose distribution change for heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Respiratory Rate
Breast
Radiation
Respiration
Spiral Computed Tomography
Breast Neoplasms
Reference Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐DD‐A2‐06 : The Effect of Respiratory Rate and Radiation Timing On Dose Coverage in Dynamic Breast IMRT. / Ding, C.; li, X.; Huq, M.; Saw, C.; Heron, D.; Yue, N.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e18bd772dcab4ffdb293b94dd957d39e,
title = "SU‐DD‐A2‐06: The Effect of Respiratory Rate and Radiation Timing On Dose Coverage in Dynamic Breast IMRT",
abstract = "Purpose: IMRT has been shown to be capable of delivering plans with desirable homogeneous dose distribution for breast cancer treatment. However, the dose distribution may be influenced by interplay between dynamic MLC and respiratory motion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of respiratory rate and radiation timing on the dose distribution of breast dynamic IMRT. Method and Materials: Using similar setup configuration, a helical CT and 4DCT image sets for six breast cancer patients were collected and contoured. Dynamic IMRT plans were designed using the helical CT images. The planned MLC sequence was segmented according to the respiratory phases with a series of respiratory rates (7.5–30/min) and radiation timing (evenly distributed in respiratory cycles). The segmented dynamic MLC sequences were applied to the radiation fields on the corresponding 4DCT phases. A program was developed to calculate the cumulative dose distribution from all the phases. Results: For normal breathing rates (15–20/min), the dose coverage didn't change significantly regardless of radiation starting time. The change of target V90 was less than 2{\%}. However, for extremely slow respiratory rates (7.5–10/min), the dose distribution and V90 changed significantly depending on the radiation timing. The change of target V90 was more than 10{\%}. There was no significant dose coverage change for the underlying heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing. Conclusions: For breast patients treated with dynamic IMRT, if the respiratory rate of the patient is within the “normal” range then the impact of such respiration on dose coverage of the target was found to be statistically insignificant. However, the dose distribution may change significantly when patient has a slow breathing rate. Respiratory gating may be required to obtain satisfactory dose coverage for such cases. There was no significant dose distribution change for heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing.",
author = "C. Ding and X. li and M. Huq and C. Saw and D. Heron and N. Yue",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1118/1.2240141",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐DD‐A2‐06

T2 - The Effect of Respiratory Rate and Radiation Timing On Dose Coverage in Dynamic Breast IMRT

AU - Ding, C.

AU - li, X.

AU - Huq, M.

AU - Saw, C.

AU - Heron, D.

AU - Yue, N.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose: IMRT has been shown to be capable of delivering plans with desirable homogeneous dose distribution for breast cancer treatment. However, the dose distribution may be influenced by interplay between dynamic MLC and respiratory motion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of respiratory rate and radiation timing on the dose distribution of breast dynamic IMRT. Method and Materials: Using similar setup configuration, a helical CT and 4DCT image sets for six breast cancer patients were collected and contoured. Dynamic IMRT plans were designed using the helical CT images. The planned MLC sequence was segmented according to the respiratory phases with a series of respiratory rates (7.5–30/min) and radiation timing (evenly distributed in respiratory cycles). The segmented dynamic MLC sequences were applied to the radiation fields on the corresponding 4DCT phases. A program was developed to calculate the cumulative dose distribution from all the phases. Results: For normal breathing rates (15–20/min), the dose coverage didn't change significantly regardless of radiation starting time. The change of target V90 was less than 2%. However, for extremely slow respiratory rates (7.5–10/min), the dose distribution and V90 changed significantly depending on the radiation timing. The change of target V90 was more than 10%. There was no significant dose coverage change for the underlying heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing. Conclusions: For breast patients treated with dynamic IMRT, if the respiratory rate of the patient is within the “normal” range then the impact of such respiration on dose coverage of the target was found to be statistically insignificant. However, the dose distribution may change significantly when patient has a slow breathing rate. Respiratory gating may be required to obtain satisfactory dose coverage for such cases. There was no significant dose distribution change for heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing.

AB - Purpose: IMRT has been shown to be capable of delivering plans with desirable homogeneous dose distribution for breast cancer treatment. However, the dose distribution may be influenced by interplay between dynamic MLC and respiratory motion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of respiratory rate and radiation timing on the dose distribution of breast dynamic IMRT. Method and Materials: Using similar setup configuration, a helical CT and 4DCT image sets for six breast cancer patients were collected and contoured. Dynamic IMRT plans were designed using the helical CT images. The planned MLC sequence was segmented according to the respiratory phases with a series of respiratory rates (7.5–30/min) and radiation timing (evenly distributed in respiratory cycles). The segmented dynamic MLC sequences were applied to the radiation fields on the corresponding 4DCT phases. A program was developed to calculate the cumulative dose distribution from all the phases. Results: For normal breathing rates (15–20/min), the dose coverage didn't change significantly regardless of radiation starting time. The change of target V90 was less than 2%. However, for extremely slow respiratory rates (7.5–10/min), the dose distribution and V90 changed significantly depending on the radiation timing. The change of target V90 was more than 10%. There was no significant dose coverage change for the underlying heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing. Conclusions: For breast patients treated with dynamic IMRT, if the respiratory rate of the patient is within the “normal” range then the impact of such respiration on dose coverage of the target was found to be statistically insignificant. However, the dose distribution may change significantly when patient has a slow breathing rate. Respiratory gating may be required to obtain satisfactory dose coverage for such cases. There was no significant dose distribution change for heart regardless respiratory rate or radiation timing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024780376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024780376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2240141

DO - 10.1118/1.2240141

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024780376

VL - 33

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -