SU‐E‐J‐185: 4DCT Geometrical Eigenmode Model for Inter‐Fraction Evaluation of Tumor Regression and Breathing Pattern Changes

V. Kearney, X. Wang, X. Jia, S. Jiang, L. Cervino

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluate the feasibility of using intra‐fractional respiratory dominant eigenmodes of lung deformation as a method to track inter‐fractional tumor regression and other physiological changes. Geometrical evaluation by dominant eigenmodes during free‐breathing may be implemented as an IGART tool for assessing inter‐fractional non‐respiratory anatomical variation. Methods: Intra‐fractional deformable image registration (DIR) is performed on 4DCT scans of lung cancer patients. Principal component analysis is conducted on a set of 10 deformation vector fields for each patient both with and without a lung mask. Leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV) is used to assess intra‐fractional modeling error among a subset of respiratory phases. The first two dominant eigenmodes of PCA are compared across patients in axial, sagittal, and coronal slices. Results: Eigenvalues between the first and second dominant respiratory modes decay by a factor of ten for all patients. Intra‐fractional LOOCV maximum error is on the order of 1mm inside the lung and 4–6mm for the whole thorax for all patients using the first two dominant eigenmodes. Eigenvalue decay is fastest for patients where diaphragm motion is relatively larger in magnitude. The first two eigenmodes generally demonstrate a strong but smooth superior‐inferior motion component with a lesser lateral and anterior‐posterior component, while subsequent less dominant eigenmodes produce more random directional eigenvector fields. Conclusion: The two first principal components are consistent amongst patients. Inter‐fractional eigenmode comparison may provide a means to track tumor regression and breathing pattern or physiological changes. We expect that patients with more dominant diaphragmatic respiration will allow for more delineated eigenmode classification. Clear dominant eigenmode delineation may allow subsequent less dominant eigenmodes to be inter‐fractionally compared as a means to evaluate and compensate for tumor regression.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3695
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Respiration
Neoplasms
Lung
Passive Cutaneous Anaphylaxis
Masks
Diaphragm
Principal Component Analysis
Lung Neoplasms
Thorax

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐J‐185 : 4DCT Geometrical Eigenmode Model for Inter‐Fraction Evaluation of Tumor Regression and Breathing Pattern Changes. / Kearney, V.; Wang, X.; Jia, X.; Jiang, S.; Cervino, L.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2012, p. 3695.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0bfe508d628b4b77b0d4a076af50d1ed,
title = "SU‐E‐J‐185: 4DCT Geometrical Eigenmode Model for Inter‐Fraction Evaluation of Tumor Regression and Breathing Pattern Changes",
abstract = "Purpose: Evaluate the feasibility of using intra‐fractional respiratory dominant eigenmodes of lung deformation as a method to track inter‐fractional tumor regression and other physiological changes. Geometrical evaluation by dominant eigenmodes during free‐breathing may be implemented as an IGART tool for assessing inter‐fractional non‐respiratory anatomical variation. Methods: Intra‐fractional deformable image registration (DIR) is performed on 4DCT scans of lung cancer patients. Principal component analysis is conducted on a set of 10 deformation vector fields for each patient both with and without a lung mask. Leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV) is used to assess intra‐fractional modeling error among a subset of respiratory phases. The first two dominant eigenmodes of PCA are compared across patients in axial, sagittal, and coronal slices. Results: Eigenvalues between the first and second dominant respiratory modes decay by a factor of ten for all patients. Intra‐fractional LOOCV maximum error is on the order of 1mm inside the lung and 4–6mm for the whole thorax for all patients using the first two dominant eigenmodes. Eigenvalue decay is fastest for patients where diaphragm motion is relatively larger in magnitude. The first two eigenmodes generally demonstrate a strong but smooth superior‐inferior motion component with a lesser lateral and anterior‐posterior component, while subsequent less dominant eigenmodes produce more random directional eigenvector fields. Conclusion: The two first principal components are consistent amongst patients. Inter‐fractional eigenmode comparison may provide a means to track tumor regression and breathing pattern or physiological changes. We expect that patients with more dominant diaphragmatic respiration will allow for more delineated eigenmode classification. Clear dominant eigenmode delineation may allow subsequent less dominant eigenmodes to be inter‐fractionally compared as a means to evaluate and compensate for tumor regression.",
author = "V. Kearney and X. Wang and X. Jia and S. Jiang and L. Cervino",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1118/1.4735026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "3695",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐J‐185

T2 - 4DCT Geometrical Eigenmode Model for Inter‐Fraction Evaluation of Tumor Regression and Breathing Pattern Changes

AU - Kearney, V.

AU - Wang, X.

AU - Jia, X.

AU - Jiang, S.

AU - Cervino, L.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: Evaluate the feasibility of using intra‐fractional respiratory dominant eigenmodes of lung deformation as a method to track inter‐fractional tumor regression and other physiological changes. Geometrical evaluation by dominant eigenmodes during free‐breathing may be implemented as an IGART tool for assessing inter‐fractional non‐respiratory anatomical variation. Methods: Intra‐fractional deformable image registration (DIR) is performed on 4DCT scans of lung cancer patients. Principal component analysis is conducted on a set of 10 deformation vector fields for each patient both with and without a lung mask. Leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV) is used to assess intra‐fractional modeling error among a subset of respiratory phases. The first two dominant eigenmodes of PCA are compared across patients in axial, sagittal, and coronal slices. Results: Eigenvalues between the first and second dominant respiratory modes decay by a factor of ten for all patients. Intra‐fractional LOOCV maximum error is on the order of 1mm inside the lung and 4–6mm for the whole thorax for all patients using the first two dominant eigenmodes. Eigenvalue decay is fastest for patients where diaphragm motion is relatively larger in magnitude. The first two eigenmodes generally demonstrate a strong but smooth superior‐inferior motion component with a lesser lateral and anterior‐posterior component, while subsequent less dominant eigenmodes produce more random directional eigenvector fields. Conclusion: The two first principal components are consistent amongst patients. Inter‐fractional eigenmode comparison may provide a means to track tumor regression and breathing pattern or physiological changes. We expect that patients with more dominant diaphragmatic respiration will allow for more delineated eigenmode classification. Clear dominant eigenmode delineation may allow subsequent less dominant eigenmodes to be inter‐fractionally compared as a means to evaluate and compensate for tumor regression.

AB - Purpose: Evaluate the feasibility of using intra‐fractional respiratory dominant eigenmodes of lung deformation as a method to track inter‐fractional tumor regression and other physiological changes. Geometrical evaluation by dominant eigenmodes during free‐breathing may be implemented as an IGART tool for assessing inter‐fractional non‐respiratory anatomical variation. Methods: Intra‐fractional deformable image registration (DIR) is performed on 4DCT scans of lung cancer patients. Principal component analysis is conducted on a set of 10 deformation vector fields for each patient both with and without a lung mask. Leave‐one‐out cross‐validation (LOOCV) is used to assess intra‐fractional modeling error among a subset of respiratory phases. The first two dominant eigenmodes of PCA are compared across patients in axial, sagittal, and coronal slices. Results: Eigenvalues between the first and second dominant respiratory modes decay by a factor of ten for all patients. Intra‐fractional LOOCV maximum error is on the order of 1mm inside the lung and 4–6mm for the whole thorax for all patients using the first two dominant eigenmodes. Eigenvalue decay is fastest for patients where diaphragm motion is relatively larger in magnitude. The first two eigenmodes generally demonstrate a strong but smooth superior‐inferior motion component with a lesser lateral and anterior‐posterior component, while subsequent less dominant eigenmodes produce more random directional eigenvector fields. Conclusion: The two first principal components are consistent amongst patients. Inter‐fractional eigenmode comparison may provide a means to track tumor regression and breathing pattern or physiological changes. We expect that patients with more dominant diaphragmatic respiration will allow for more delineated eigenmode classification. Clear dominant eigenmode delineation may allow subsequent less dominant eigenmodes to be inter‐fractionally compared as a means to evaluate and compensate for tumor regression.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024805075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024805075&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4735026

DO - 10.1118/1.4735026

M3 - Article

C2 - 28519034

AN - SCOPUS:85024805075

VL - 39

SP - 3695

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -