SU‐E‐T‐345: A Dosimetric Study of Spatially Fractionated Radiation (GRID) Using Linac Grid Block and Newly Designed Virtual TOMOGRID Template

X. Zhang, J. Penagaricano, S. Sharma, R. Clarkson, M. Chao, X. Chen, E. Han, P. Corry, V. Ratanatharathorn, Y. Yan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison for spatially fractionated external beam radiation (GRID) using linear accelerator with a dedicated GRID block and Helical Tomotherapy using a virtual TOMOGRID template. Methods: The GRID phantom treatment plan was generated with dedicated GRID block (Radiation Products Design, Inc.) using the Pinnacle v9.0 TPS. The dose profiles were measured using EDR2 films with 100cm SSD at depths of dmax and 10cm for both 6MV X‐rays and 18MV X‐rays beam. TOMOGRID targets were generated using a virtual TOMOGRID template (VTT) provided by an in‐house software (DICOMan). The programmable VTT was configured in various settings to generate TOMOGRID targets (GRID GTV) and a structure of avoidance (SOA). TomoTherapy Plans based on GRID GTVs and SOAs were generated on HiArt TomoTherapy v4.0.4 TPS. Results: For the dose under linac block, the dose decreases with increasing depth under the open area, while the dose under block area is nearly constant. At dmax, the average valley to peak (V/P) ratio is around 0.2 for 6MV X‐rays and 0.3 for 18MV X‐rays. Ten treated linac‐based GRID patients were selected and the same average V/P ratio was obtained. The dose distribution with the properly designed virtual TOMOGRID templates was similar to the linac‐based GRID dose distribution. At isocenter, The V/P ratio is 0.5 and 0.42 for the two TOMOGRID plans used in this study. The V/P ratio is almost constant under linac block across the isocenter plane while the ratio was different under TOMOGRID plans across the isocenter plane. Conclusions: GRID radiation using Tomotherapy is a breakthrough technique. Helical Tomotherapy‐based GRID can provide at least equivalent GTV coverage compared to linac‐based GRID while allowing 3‐D optimization to achieve superior sparing of organs‐at‐risk and no high‐dose spill outside the GRID GTV.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

X-Rays
Radiation
Silver Sulfadiazine
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Particle Accelerators
Software
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐345 : A Dosimetric Study of Spatially Fractionated Radiation (GRID) Using Linac Grid Block and Newly Designed Virtual TOMOGRID Template. / Zhang, X.; Penagaricano, J.; Sharma, S.; Clarkson, R.; Chao, M.; Chen, X.; Han, E.; Corry, P.; Ratanatharathorn, V.; Yan, Y.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, X. ; Penagaricano, J. ; Sharma, S. ; Clarkson, R. ; Chao, M. ; Chen, X. ; Han, E. ; Corry, P. ; Ratanatharathorn, V. ; Yan, Y. / SU‐E‐T‐345 : A Dosimetric Study of Spatially Fractionated Radiation (GRID) Using Linac Grid Block and Newly Designed Virtual TOMOGRID Template. In: Medical Physics. 2012 ; Vol. 39, No. 6.
@article{413dc8e90def42b1bee80d6c9da57bd9,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐345: A Dosimetric Study of Spatially Fractionated Radiation (GRID) Using Linac Grid Block and Newly Designed Virtual TOMOGRID Template",
abstract = "Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison for spatially fractionated external beam radiation (GRID) using linear accelerator with a dedicated GRID block and Helical Tomotherapy using a virtual TOMOGRID template. Methods: The GRID phantom treatment plan was generated with dedicated GRID block (Radiation Products Design, Inc.) using the Pinnacle v9.0 TPS. The dose profiles were measured using EDR2 films with 100cm SSD at depths of dmax and 10cm for both 6MV X‐rays and 18MV X‐rays beam. TOMOGRID targets were generated using a virtual TOMOGRID template (VTT) provided by an in‐house software (DICOMan). The programmable VTT was configured in various settings to generate TOMOGRID targets (GRID GTV) and a structure of avoidance (SOA). TomoTherapy Plans based on GRID GTVs and SOAs were generated on HiArt TomoTherapy v4.0.4 TPS. Results: For the dose under linac block, the dose decreases with increasing depth under the open area, while the dose under block area is nearly constant. At dmax, the average valley to peak (V/P) ratio is around 0.2 for 6MV X‐rays and 0.3 for 18MV X‐rays. Ten treated linac‐based GRID patients were selected and the same average V/P ratio was obtained. The dose distribution with the properly designed virtual TOMOGRID templates was similar to the linac‐based GRID dose distribution. At isocenter, The V/P ratio is 0.5 and 0.42 for the two TOMOGRID plans used in this study. The V/P ratio is almost constant under linac block across the isocenter plane while the ratio was different under TOMOGRID plans across the isocenter plane. Conclusions: GRID radiation using Tomotherapy is a breakthrough technique. Helical Tomotherapy‐based GRID can provide at least equivalent GTV coverage compared to linac‐based GRID while allowing 3‐D optimization to achieve superior sparing of organs‐at‐risk and no high‐dose spill outside the GRID GTV.",
author = "X. Zhang and J. Penagaricano and S. Sharma and R. Clarkson and M. Chao and X. Chen and E. Han and P. Corry and V. Ratanatharathorn and Y. Yan",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1118/1.4735432",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐345

T2 - A Dosimetric Study of Spatially Fractionated Radiation (GRID) Using Linac Grid Block and Newly Designed Virtual TOMOGRID Template

AU - Zhang, X.

AU - Penagaricano, J.

AU - Sharma, S.

AU - Clarkson, R.

AU - Chao, M.

AU - Chen, X.

AU - Han, E.

AU - Corry, P.

AU - Ratanatharathorn, V.

AU - Yan, Y.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison for spatially fractionated external beam radiation (GRID) using linear accelerator with a dedicated GRID block and Helical Tomotherapy using a virtual TOMOGRID template. Methods: The GRID phantom treatment plan was generated with dedicated GRID block (Radiation Products Design, Inc.) using the Pinnacle v9.0 TPS. The dose profiles were measured using EDR2 films with 100cm SSD at depths of dmax and 10cm for both 6MV X‐rays and 18MV X‐rays beam. TOMOGRID targets were generated using a virtual TOMOGRID template (VTT) provided by an in‐house software (DICOMan). The programmable VTT was configured in various settings to generate TOMOGRID targets (GRID GTV) and a structure of avoidance (SOA). TomoTherapy Plans based on GRID GTVs and SOAs were generated on HiArt TomoTherapy v4.0.4 TPS. Results: For the dose under linac block, the dose decreases with increasing depth under the open area, while the dose under block area is nearly constant. At dmax, the average valley to peak (V/P) ratio is around 0.2 for 6MV X‐rays and 0.3 for 18MV X‐rays. Ten treated linac‐based GRID patients were selected and the same average V/P ratio was obtained. The dose distribution with the properly designed virtual TOMOGRID templates was similar to the linac‐based GRID dose distribution. At isocenter, The V/P ratio is 0.5 and 0.42 for the two TOMOGRID plans used in this study. The V/P ratio is almost constant under linac block across the isocenter plane while the ratio was different under TOMOGRID plans across the isocenter plane. Conclusions: GRID radiation using Tomotherapy is a breakthrough technique. Helical Tomotherapy‐based GRID can provide at least equivalent GTV coverage compared to linac‐based GRID while allowing 3‐D optimization to achieve superior sparing of organs‐at‐risk and no high‐dose spill outside the GRID GTV.

AB - Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison for spatially fractionated external beam radiation (GRID) using linear accelerator with a dedicated GRID block and Helical Tomotherapy using a virtual TOMOGRID template. Methods: The GRID phantom treatment plan was generated with dedicated GRID block (Radiation Products Design, Inc.) using the Pinnacle v9.0 TPS. The dose profiles were measured using EDR2 films with 100cm SSD at depths of dmax and 10cm for both 6MV X‐rays and 18MV X‐rays beam. TOMOGRID targets were generated using a virtual TOMOGRID template (VTT) provided by an in‐house software (DICOMan). The programmable VTT was configured in various settings to generate TOMOGRID targets (GRID GTV) and a structure of avoidance (SOA). TomoTherapy Plans based on GRID GTVs and SOAs were generated on HiArt TomoTherapy v4.0.4 TPS. Results: For the dose under linac block, the dose decreases with increasing depth under the open area, while the dose under block area is nearly constant. At dmax, the average valley to peak (V/P) ratio is around 0.2 for 6MV X‐rays and 0.3 for 18MV X‐rays. Ten treated linac‐based GRID patients were selected and the same average V/P ratio was obtained. The dose distribution with the properly designed virtual TOMOGRID templates was similar to the linac‐based GRID dose distribution. At isocenter, The V/P ratio is 0.5 and 0.42 for the two TOMOGRID plans used in this study. The V/P ratio is almost constant under linac block across the isocenter plane while the ratio was different under TOMOGRID plans across the isocenter plane. Conclusions: GRID radiation using Tomotherapy is a breakthrough technique. Helical Tomotherapy‐based GRID can provide at least equivalent GTV coverage compared to linac‐based GRID while allowing 3‐D optimization to achieve superior sparing of organs‐at‐risk and no high‐dose spill outside the GRID GTV.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024792056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024792056&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4735432

DO - 10.1118/1.4735432

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024792056

VL - 39

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -