SU‐E‐T‐478: TomoTherapy® with 180 Beam Angles Per Rotation for Small Target Off‐Axis Treatment

Y. Chen, Q. Chen, M. Chen, K. Ruchala, W. lu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Investigate the effect of increasing the number of beam angles per rotation to treat small off‐axis targets with helical tomotherapy. Methods: TomoTherapy® gantry rotates continuously although radiation beam angles are discretized in the optimization. At each projection angle, the leaf open/close pattern is assumed unchanged. However, for small off‐axis targets, the beam motion within a projection (7 degree) may require substantial portion of leaves to open/close for better target conformity. An off‐axis (17 cm) target of 1 cm diameter in a cheese phantom was used in the planning study. The plans were optimized with 180 and 51 beam angles with source super sampling and the results were compared. The optimization constraints are the same for the two plans. Measurements were taken for a plan with four cylindrical targets of 1 cm diameter located at different radii from the central axis along a line in a cheese phantom. The plan was optimized and delivered with 180 beam angles on a Hi‐Art® system. An EDR2 film was placed in the plane lined up with the four targets to measure the transverse dose distribution. Ion chamber point measurements were taken near three targets of the four. Results: Compared to the plan with 51 beam angles, the plan with 180 angles showed a 70% decrease of (D2‐D98) for target dose uniformity, a 27% decrease of D100 for OAR avoidance and a 12% decrease of beam‐on time. The film measurement showed good agreement between calculation and measurement. The point dose measurements showed agreement within a 1.6% difference. Conclusions: Delivery with 180 beam angles can improve the plan quality for small off‐ axis targets over 51 beam angles with source super sampling. Both target dose uniformity and OAR avoidance are improved. The plan with 180 beam angles was delivered and the measurements agreed with the calculation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume38
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Cheese
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
Ions
Radiation
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐478 : TomoTherapy® with 180 Beam Angles Per Rotation for Small Target Off‐Axis Treatment. / Chen, Y.; Chen, Q.; Chen, M.; Ruchala, K.; lu, W.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{98684ce733fa4fc0ab208bdf318fd4f9,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐478: TomoTherapy{\circledR} with 180 Beam Angles Per Rotation for Small Target Off‐Axis Treatment",
abstract = "Purpose: Investigate the effect of increasing the number of beam angles per rotation to treat small off‐axis targets with helical tomotherapy. Methods: TomoTherapy{\circledR} gantry rotates continuously although radiation beam angles are discretized in the optimization. At each projection angle, the leaf open/close pattern is assumed unchanged. However, for small off‐axis targets, the beam motion within a projection (7 degree) may require substantial portion of leaves to open/close for better target conformity. An off‐axis (17 cm) target of 1 cm diameter in a cheese phantom was used in the planning study. The plans were optimized with 180 and 51 beam angles with source super sampling and the results were compared. The optimization constraints are the same for the two plans. Measurements were taken for a plan with four cylindrical targets of 1 cm diameter located at different radii from the central axis along a line in a cheese phantom. The plan was optimized and delivered with 180 beam angles on a Hi‐Art{\circledR} system. An EDR2 film was placed in the plane lined up with the four targets to measure the transverse dose distribution. Ion chamber point measurements were taken near three targets of the four. Results: Compared to the plan with 51 beam angles, the plan with 180 angles showed a 70{\%} decrease of (D2‐D98) for target dose uniformity, a 27{\%} decrease of D100 for OAR avoidance and a 12{\%} decrease of beam‐on time. The film measurement showed good agreement between calculation and measurement. The point dose measurements showed agreement within a 1.6{\%} difference. Conclusions: Delivery with 180 beam angles can improve the plan quality for small off‐ axis targets over 51 beam angles with source super sampling. Both target dose uniformity and OAR avoidance are improved. The plan with 180 beam angles was delivered and the measurements agreed with the calculation.",
author = "Y. Chen and Q. Chen and M. Chen and K. Ruchala and W. lu",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1118/1.3612432",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐478

T2 - TomoTherapy® with 180 Beam Angles Per Rotation for Small Target Off‐Axis Treatment

AU - Chen, Y.

AU - Chen, Q.

AU - Chen, M.

AU - Ruchala, K.

AU - lu, W.

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Purpose: Investigate the effect of increasing the number of beam angles per rotation to treat small off‐axis targets with helical tomotherapy. Methods: TomoTherapy® gantry rotates continuously although radiation beam angles are discretized in the optimization. At each projection angle, the leaf open/close pattern is assumed unchanged. However, for small off‐axis targets, the beam motion within a projection (7 degree) may require substantial portion of leaves to open/close for better target conformity. An off‐axis (17 cm) target of 1 cm diameter in a cheese phantom was used in the planning study. The plans were optimized with 180 and 51 beam angles with source super sampling and the results were compared. The optimization constraints are the same for the two plans. Measurements were taken for a plan with four cylindrical targets of 1 cm diameter located at different radii from the central axis along a line in a cheese phantom. The plan was optimized and delivered with 180 beam angles on a Hi‐Art® system. An EDR2 film was placed in the plane lined up with the four targets to measure the transverse dose distribution. Ion chamber point measurements were taken near three targets of the four. Results: Compared to the plan with 51 beam angles, the plan with 180 angles showed a 70% decrease of (D2‐D98) for target dose uniformity, a 27% decrease of D100 for OAR avoidance and a 12% decrease of beam‐on time. The film measurement showed good agreement between calculation and measurement. The point dose measurements showed agreement within a 1.6% difference. Conclusions: Delivery with 180 beam angles can improve the plan quality for small off‐ axis targets over 51 beam angles with source super sampling. Both target dose uniformity and OAR avoidance are improved. The plan with 180 beam angles was delivered and the measurements agreed with the calculation.

AB - Purpose: Investigate the effect of increasing the number of beam angles per rotation to treat small off‐axis targets with helical tomotherapy. Methods: TomoTherapy® gantry rotates continuously although radiation beam angles are discretized in the optimization. At each projection angle, the leaf open/close pattern is assumed unchanged. However, for small off‐axis targets, the beam motion within a projection (7 degree) may require substantial portion of leaves to open/close for better target conformity. An off‐axis (17 cm) target of 1 cm diameter in a cheese phantom was used in the planning study. The plans were optimized with 180 and 51 beam angles with source super sampling and the results were compared. The optimization constraints are the same for the two plans. Measurements were taken for a plan with four cylindrical targets of 1 cm diameter located at different radii from the central axis along a line in a cheese phantom. The plan was optimized and delivered with 180 beam angles on a Hi‐Art® system. An EDR2 film was placed in the plane lined up with the four targets to measure the transverse dose distribution. Ion chamber point measurements were taken near three targets of the four. Results: Compared to the plan with 51 beam angles, the plan with 180 angles showed a 70% decrease of (D2‐D98) for target dose uniformity, a 27% decrease of D100 for OAR avoidance and a 12% decrease of beam‐on time. The film measurement showed good agreement between calculation and measurement. The point dose measurements showed agreement within a 1.6% difference. Conclusions: Delivery with 180 beam angles can improve the plan quality for small off‐ axis targets over 51 beam angles with source super sampling. Both target dose uniformity and OAR avoidance are improved. The plan with 180 beam angles was delivered and the measurements agreed with the calculation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024824348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024824348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3612432

DO - 10.1118/1.3612432

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024824348

VL - 38

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -