SU‐E‐T‐570: Optimizing Dose Calculation Parameters for GPU‐Based Treatment Planning

C. Sutterley, Q. Gautier, Y. Graves, N. li, X. Jia, S. Jiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: Graphics processing unit (GPU)‐based treatment planning is clinically desirable given its extremely high efficiency. One technical barrier for clinical implementation is the relatively small memory of GPU cards. The goal of this study is to find the optimal parameters used in dose deposition matrix (DDM) computations via finite size pencil beam (FSPB) model for IMRT optimization that maintains plan quality while minimizing memory usage. Methods: We used our in‐house GPU‐based treatment planning system, SCORE, to investigate the impact of parameters used in DDM calculations, i.e., beamlet size and dose cutoff value, on the resulting plan quality and memory usage. We varied beamlet width from 2mm to 6mm, while fixing beamlet height to 5mm, and dose cutoff value from 0.01% to 1% of the maximum beamlet dose. For each combination of parameters we used SCORE to create the DDM. A treatment plan is optimized using the DDM and the resulting final dose distribution is evaluated by comparing it with the ground truth distribution (obtained under 2mm beamlet width and 0.01% dose cutoff value) using gamma test (2mm/2%) passing rate. Results: We tested various combinations of the parameters on head/neck, prostate, and lung cancer patients. It is found that plan quality is highly sensitive to the beamlet size, such that increasing beamlet width to 3mm will reduce the passing rate to below 90%. In contrast, when keeping beamlet width at 2mm, but increasing dose cutoff parameter to 0.1%, a passing rate of over 95% is still maintained. The memory usage is reduced by a factor of 5.5 on average. Conclusion: The optimal parameter for DDM calculation using FSPB model is beamlet size of 2mm and dose cutoff value of 0.1%, under which high plan quality is maintained while GPU memory usage is greatly reduced.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Therapeutics
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Lung Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms
Efficiency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐E‐T‐570 : Optimizing Dose Calculation Parameters for GPU‐Based Treatment Planning. / Sutterley, C.; Gautier, Q.; Graves, Y.; li, N.; Jia, X.; Jiang, S.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2013, p. 336.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sutterley, C. ; Gautier, Q. ; Graves, Y. ; li, N. ; Jia, X. ; Jiang, S. / SU‐E‐T‐570 : Optimizing Dose Calculation Parameters for GPU‐Based Treatment Planning. In: Medical Physics. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 336.
@article{266390a50a6140e3b960ce2dfa5637cb,
title = "SU‐E‐T‐570: Optimizing Dose Calculation Parameters for GPU‐Based Treatment Planning",
abstract = "Purpose: Graphics processing unit (GPU)‐based treatment planning is clinically desirable given its extremely high efficiency. One technical barrier for clinical implementation is the relatively small memory of GPU cards. The goal of this study is to find the optimal parameters used in dose deposition matrix (DDM) computations via finite size pencil beam (FSPB) model for IMRT optimization that maintains plan quality while minimizing memory usage. Methods: We used our in‐house GPU‐based treatment planning system, SCORE, to investigate the impact of parameters used in DDM calculations, i.e., beamlet size and dose cutoff value, on the resulting plan quality and memory usage. We varied beamlet width from 2mm to 6mm, while fixing beamlet height to 5mm, and dose cutoff value from 0.01{\%} to 1{\%} of the maximum beamlet dose. For each combination of parameters we used SCORE to create the DDM. A treatment plan is optimized using the DDM and the resulting final dose distribution is evaluated by comparing it with the ground truth distribution (obtained under 2mm beamlet width and 0.01{\%} dose cutoff value) using gamma test (2mm/2{\%}) passing rate. Results: We tested various combinations of the parameters on head/neck, prostate, and lung cancer patients. It is found that plan quality is highly sensitive to the beamlet size, such that increasing beamlet width to 3mm will reduce the passing rate to below 90{\%}. In contrast, when keeping beamlet width at 2mm, but increasing dose cutoff parameter to 0.1{\%}, a passing rate of over 95{\%} is still maintained. The memory usage is reduced by a factor of 5.5 on average. Conclusion: The optimal parameter for DDM calculation using FSPB model is beamlet size of 2mm and dose cutoff value of 0.1{\%}, under which high plan quality is maintained while GPU memory usage is greatly reduced.",
author = "C. Sutterley and Q. Gautier and Y. Graves and N. li and X. Jia and S. Jiang",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1118/1.4814999",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "336",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐E‐T‐570

T2 - Optimizing Dose Calculation Parameters for GPU‐Based Treatment Planning

AU - Sutterley, C.

AU - Gautier, Q.

AU - Graves, Y.

AU - li, N.

AU - Jia, X.

AU - Jiang, S.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: Graphics processing unit (GPU)‐based treatment planning is clinically desirable given its extremely high efficiency. One technical barrier for clinical implementation is the relatively small memory of GPU cards. The goal of this study is to find the optimal parameters used in dose deposition matrix (DDM) computations via finite size pencil beam (FSPB) model for IMRT optimization that maintains plan quality while minimizing memory usage. Methods: We used our in‐house GPU‐based treatment planning system, SCORE, to investigate the impact of parameters used in DDM calculations, i.e., beamlet size and dose cutoff value, on the resulting plan quality and memory usage. We varied beamlet width from 2mm to 6mm, while fixing beamlet height to 5mm, and dose cutoff value from 0.01% to 1% of the maximum beamlet dose. For each combination of parameters we used SCORE to create the DDM. A treatment plan is optimized using the DDM and the resulting final dose distribution is evaluated by comparing it with the ground truth distribution (obtained under 2mm beamlet width and 0.01% dose cutoff value) using gamma test (2mm/2%) passing rate. Results: We tested various combinations of the parameters on head/neck, prostate, and lung cancer patients. It is found that plan quality is highly sensitive to the beamlet size, such that increasing beamlet width to 3mm will reduce the passing rate to below 90%. In contrast, when keeping beamlet width at 2mm, but increasing dose cutoff parameter to 0.1%, a passing rate of over 95% is still maintained. The memory usage is reduced by a factor of 5.5 on average. Conclusion: The optimal parameter for DDM calculation using FSPB model is beamlet size of 2mm and dose cutoff value of 0.1%, under which high plan quality is maintained while GPU memory usage is greatly reduced.

AB - Purpose: Graphics processing unit (GPU)‐based treatment planning is clinically desirable given its extremely high efficiency. One technical barrier for clinical implementation is the relatively small memory of GPU cards. The goal of this study is to find the optimal parameters used in dose deposition matrix (DDM) computations via finite size pencil beam (FSPB) model for IMRT optimization that maintains plan quality while minimizing memory usage. Methods: We used our in‐house GPU‐based treatment planning system, SCORE, to investigate the impact of parameters used in DDM calculations, i.e., beamlet size and dose cutoff value, on the resulting plan quality and memory usage. We varied beamlet width from 2mm to 6mm, while fixing beamlet height to 5mm, and dose cutoff value from 0.01% to 1% of the maximum beamlet dose. For each combination of parameters we used SCORE to create the DDM. A treatment plan is optimized using the DDM and the resulting final dose distribution is evaluated by comparing it with the ground truth distribution (obtained under 2mm beamlet width and 0.01% dose cutoff value) using gamma test (2mm/2%) passing rate. Results: We tested various combinations of the parameters on head/neck, prostate, and lung cancer patients. It is found that plan quality is highly sensitive to the beamlet size, such that increasing beamlet width to 3mm will reduce the passing rate to below 90%. In contrast, when keeping beamlet width at 2mm, but increasing dose cutoff parameter to 0.1%, a passing rate of over 95% is still maintained. The memory usage is reduced by a factor of 5.5 on average. Conclusion: The optimal parameter for DDM calculation using FSPB model is beamlet size of 2mm and dose cutoff value of 0.1%, under which high plan quality is maintained while GPU memory usage is greatly reduced.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024774663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024774663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.4814999

DO - 10.1118/1.4814999

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024774663

VL - 40

SP - 336

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -