SU‐FF‐I‐34: Effect of Motion On High Contrast Vessel‐Like Objects for Volumetric DCE‐CT

A. Owrangi, H. Keller, C. Coolens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the impact of motion on high‐contrast vessel‐like objects in volumetric CT scans as a step towards volumetric DCE‐CT on a 320‐slice CT scanner. Material and Methods: An acrylic cylindrical phantom was constructed to investigate influence of motion on contrast‐enhanced cylindrical structures (capsules) mimicking contrast‐bearing blood vessels. The phantom consists of 12 Teflon capsules of varying diameters (1, 2, 5 and 10 mm) embedded at predefined positions and in different orientations (longitudinal, diagonal and axial). A motor‐driven platform provided uniform phantom motion speeds of 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 cm/s along the longitudinal axis of the scanner. Gantry rotation speeds TG was varied between 0.35 and 3 s. All scans were acquired on a Toshiba Aquilion ONE CT scanner with a field‐of‐view of 16 cm in one rotation. Results: For a given phantom motion speed, HU decreased with increasing TG. Increasing the phantom motion speed from 0 to 2.0 cm/s reduced the HU by 9% for TG = 0.35 s and by 21% for TG = 3 s. Measured HU values also decreased with increasing TG for the other capsule orientations, however, it was least pronounced for the longitudinal orientation. The discrepancy between longitudinal and axial orientation is 2% for TG = 0.35 s and 9% for TG = 3 s. These differences are more pronounced for smaller capsules. Conclusions: A systematic study was performed to quantify the impact of motion on dynamic contrast‐enhanced CT measurements. It was found that contrast in vessel‐like objects is affected by orientation and motion. However, for fast gantry rotations (< 0.5 s) motion affects the contrast measurement by generally less than 10% for different phantom speeds and less than 2% for different vessel orientations. With this phantom, optimization of different scan parameters is possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Capsules
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Polytetrafluoroethylene
Blood Vessels

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐I‐34 : Effect of Motion On High Contrast Vessel‐Like Objects for Volumetric DCE‐CT. / Owrangi, A.; Keller, H.; Coolens, C.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.01.2009.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4efdac6ed72c4128ae7fc6820b3605a2,
title = "SU‐FF‐I‐34: Effect of Motion On High Contrast Vessel‐Like Objects for Volumetric DCE‐CT",
abstract = "Purpose: This study aims to assess the impact of motion on high‐contrast vessel‐like objects in volumetric CT scans as a step towards volumetric DCE‐CT on a 320‐slice CT scanner. Material and Methods: An acrylic cylindrical phantom was constructed to investigate influence of motion on contrast‐enhanced cylindrical structures (capsules) mimicking contrast‐bearing blood vessels. The phantom consists of 12 Teflon capsules of varying diameters (1, 2, 5 and 10 mm) embedded at predefined positions and in different orientations (longitudinal, diagonal and axial). A motor‐driven platform provided uniform phantom motion speeds of 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 cm/s along the longitudinal axis of the scanner. Gantry rotation speeds TG was varied between 0.35 and 3 s. All scans were acquired on a Toshiba Aquilion ONE CT scanner with a field‐of‐view of 16 cm in one rotation. Results: For a given phantom motion speed, HU decreased with increasing TG. Increasing the phantom motion speed from 0 to 2.0 cm/s reduced the HU by 9{\%} for TG = 0.35 s and by 21{\%} for TG = 3 s. Measured HU values also decreased with increasing TG for the other capsule orientations, however, it was least pronounced for the longitudinal orientation. The discrepancy between longitudinal and axial orientation is 2{\%} for TG = 0.35 s and 9{\%} for TG = 3 s. These differences are more pronounced for smaller capsules. Conclusions: A systematic study was performed to quantify the impact of motion on dynamic contrast‐enhanced CT measurements. It was found that contrast in vessel‐like objects is affected by orientation and motion. However, for fast gantry rotations (< 0.5 s) motion affects the contrast measurement by generally less than 10{\%} for different phantom speeds and less than 2{\%} for different vessel orientations. With this phantom, optimization of different scan parameters is possible.",
author = "A. Owrangi and H. Keller and C. Coolens",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3181153",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐I‐34

T2 - Effect of Motion On High Contrast Vessel‐Like Objects for Volumetric DCE‐CT

AU - Owrangi, A.

AU - Keller, H.

AU - Coolens, C.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: This study aims to assess the impact of motion on high‐contrast vessel‐like objects in volumetric CT scans as a step towards volumetric DCE‐CT on a 320‐slice CT scanner. Material and Methods: An acrylic cylindrical phantom was constructed to investigate influence of motion on contrast‐enhanced cylindrical structures (capsules) mimicking contrast‐bearing blood vessels. The phantom consists of 12 Teflon capsules of varying diameters (1, 2, 5 and 10 mm) embedded at predefined positions and in different orientations (longitudinal, diagonal and axial). A motor‐driven platform provided uniform phantom motion speeds of 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 cm/s along the longitudinal axis of the scanner. Gantry rotation speeds TG was varied between 0.35 and 3 s. All scans were acquired on a Toshiba Aquilion ONE CT scanner with a field‐of‐view of 16 cm in one rotation. Results: For a given phantom motion speed, HU decreased with increasing TG. Increasing the phantom motion speed from 0 to 2.0 cm/s reduced the HU by 9% for TG = 0.35 s and by 21% for TG = 3 s. Measured HU values also decreased with increasing TG for the other capsule orientations, however, it was least pronounced for the longitudinal orientation. The discrepancy between longitudinal and axial orientation is 2% for TG = 0.35 s and 9% for TG = 3 s. These differences are more pronounced for smaller capsules. Conclusions: A systematic study was performed to quantify the impact of motion on dynamic contrast‐enhanced CT measurements. It was found that contrast in vessel‐like objects is affected by orientation and motion. However, for fast gantry rotations (< 0.5 s) motion affects the contrast measurement by generally less than 10% for different phantom speeds and less than 2% for different vessel orientations. With this phantom, optimization of different scan parameters is possible.

AB - Purpose: This study aims to assess the impact of motion on high‐contrast vessel‐like objects in volumetric CT scans as a step towards volumetric DCE‐CT on a 320‐slice CT scanner. Material and Methods: An acrylic cylindrical phantom was constructed to investigate influence of motion on contrast‐enhanced cylindrical structures (capsules) mimicking contrast‐bearing blood vessels. The phantom consists of 12 Teflon capsules of varying diameters (1, 2, 5 and 10 mm) embedded at predefined positions and in different orientations (longitudinal, diagonal and axial). A motor‐driven platform provided uniform phantom motion speeds of 0, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 cm/s along the longitudinal axis of the scanner. Gantry rotation speeds TG was varied between 0.35 and 3 s. All scans were acquired on a Toshiba Aquilion ONE CT scanner with a field‐of‐view of 16 cm in one rotation. Results: For a given phantom motion speed, HU decreased with increasing TG. Increasing the phantom motion speed from 0 to 2.0 cm/s reduced the HU by 9% for TG = 0.35 s and by 21% for TG = 3 s. Measured HU values also decreased with increasing TG for the other capsule orientations, however, it was least pronounced for the longitudinal orientation. The discrepancy between longitudinal and axial orientation is 2% for TG = 0.35 s and 9% for TG = 3 s. These differences are more pronounced for smaller capsules. Conclusions: A systematic study was performed to quantify the impact of motion on dynamic contrast‐enhanced CT measurements. It was found that contrast in vessel‐like objects is affected by orientation and motion. However, for fast gantry rotations (< 0.5 s) motion affects the contrast measurement by generally less than 10% for different phantom speeds and less than 2% for different vessel orientations. With this phantom, optimization of different scan parameters is possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024815885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024815885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3181153

DO - 10.1118/1.3181153

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024815885

VL - 36

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -