SU‐FF‐J‐12: Respiratory Training Using Audio Visual Bio‐Feedback

r. Batta Venkat, P. Keall, A. Sawant, R. George

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a novel respiratory training tool based on audio‐visual biofeedback for 4D CT image acquisition and dynamic tumor tracking during radiation therapy. Method and Materials: During radiation therapy it is important that a patient follows the same breathing pattern throughout the treatment. However, in practice, such regularity is very difficult to achieve. Our hypothesis is that, by training a patient to breathe according to a representative breathing pattern constructed from the patient's own free breathing samples, it is possible to achieve significantly higher regularity and reproducibility in the real time breathing pattern. Initially for each subject, the real‐time position samples for free breathing are acquired using a real‐time position monitoring system. After collecting a sufficiently large number of free breathing samples, a representative breathing pattern is constructed by estimating the average of the Fourier series coefficients corresponding to each breathing cycle. The patient is then instructed to follow the representative breathing pattern as closely as possible. The new method of respiratory training was tested on four volunteers (non‐patients). For each volunteer, the data for free and trained breathing was analyzed to calculate the RMS error of period and displacement with respect to representative waveform. Results: The average of RMS errors in time period and displacement for trained breathing was 2.32 seconds and 4.32 cm respectively. Similarly, average of RMS errors for free breathing was found to be 3.27 seconds and 7.9 cm. The reduction in the errors from free breathing to trained breathing was approximately 30 percent in time period and 45 percent in displacement. Conclusion: This tool provides valuable insights into identifying respiratory training methods that are customized for each subject. Further analysis of this methodology will be performed by developing alternate user interfaces and investigating the data from a larger set of volunteers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Respiration
Volunteers
Radiotherapy
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography
Fourier Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐J‐12 : Respiratory Training Using Audio Visual Bio‐Feedback. / Venkat, r. Batta; Keall, P.; Sawant, A.; George, R.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Venkat, r. Batta ; Keall, P. ; Sawant, A. ; George, R. / SU‐FF‐J‐12 : Respiratory Training Using Audio Visual Bio‐Feedback. In: Medical Physics. 2007 ; Vol. 34, No. 6.
@article{66173ce3b88448c2a7528b55b67a3f7b,
title = "SU‐FF‐J‐12: Respiratory Training Using Audio Visual Bio‐Feedback",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a novel respiratory training tool based on audio‐visual biofeedback for 4D CT image acquisition and dynamic tumor tracking during radiation therapy. Method and Materials: During radiation therapy it is important that a patient follows the same breathing pattern throughout the treatment. However, in practice, such regularity is very difficult to achieve. Our hypothesis is that, by training a patient to breathe according to a representative breathing pattern constructed from the patient's own free breathing samples, it is possible to achieve significantly higher regularity and reproducibility in the real time breathing pattern. Initially for each subject, the real‐time position samples for free breathing are acquired using a real‐time position monitoring system. After collecting a sufficiently large number of free breathing samples, a representative breathing pattern is constructed by estimating the average of the Fourier series coefficients corresponding to each breathing cycle. The patient is then instructed to follow the representative breathing pattern as closely as possible. The new method of respiratory training was tested on four volunteers (non‐patients). For each volunteer, the data for free and trained breathing was analyzed to calculate the RMS error of period and displacement with respect to representative waveform. Results: The average of RMS errors in time period and displacement for trained breathing was 2.32 seconds and 4.32 cm respectively. Similarly, average of RMS errors for free breathing was found to be 3.27 seconds and 7.9 cm. The reduction in the errors from free breathing to trained breathing was approximately 30 percent in time period and 45 percent in displacement. Conclusion: This tool provides valuable insights into identifying respiratory training methods that are customized for each subject. Further analysis of this methodology will be performed by developing alternate user interfaces and investigating the data from a larger set of volunteers.",
author = "Venkat, {r. Batta} and P. Keall and A. Sawant and R. George",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1118/1.2760517",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐J‐12

T2 - Respiratory Training Using Audio Visual Bio‐Feedback

AU - Venkat, r. Batta

AU - Keall, P.

AU - Sawant, A.

AU - George, R.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a novel respiratory training tool based on audio‐visual biofeedback for 4D CT image acquisition and dynamic tumor tracking during radiation therapy. Method and Materials: During radiation therapy it is important that a patient follows the same breathing pattern throughout the treatment. However, in practice, such regularity is very difficult to achieve. Our hypothesis is that, by training a patient to breathe according to a representative breathing pattern constructed from the patient's own free breathing samples, it is possible to achieve significantly higher regularity and reproducibility in the real time breathing pattern. Initially for each subject, the real‐time position samples for free breathing are acquired using a real‐time position monitoring system. After collecting a sufficiently large number of free breathing samples, a representative breathing pattern is constructed by estimating the average of the Fourier series coefficients corresponding to each breathing cycle. The patient is then instructed to follow the representative breathing pattern as closely as possible. The new method of respiratory training was tested on four volunteers (non‐patients). For each volunteer, the data for free and trained breathing was analyzed to calculate the RMS error of period and displacement with respect to representative waveform. Results: The average of RMS errors in time period and displacement for trained breathing was 2.32 seconds and 4.32 cm respectively. Similarly, average of RMS errors for free breathing was found to be 3.27 seconds and 7.9 cm. The reduction in the errors from free breathing to trained breathing was approximately 30 percent in time period and 45 percent in displacement. Conclusion: This tool provides valuable insights into identifying respiratory training methods that are customized for each subject. Further analysis of this methodology will be performed by developing alternate user interfaces and investigating the data from a larger set of volunteers.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a novel respiratory training tool based on audio‐visual biofeedback for 4D CT image acquisition and dynamic tumor tracking during radiation therapy. Method and Materials: During radiation therapy it is important that a patient follows the same breathing pattern throughout the treatment. However, in practice, such regularity is very difficult to achieve. Our hypothesis is that, by training a patient to breathe according to a representative breathing pattern constructed from the patient's own free breathing samples, it is possible to achieve significantly higher regularity and reproducibility in the real time breathing pattern. Initially for each subject, the real‐time position samples for free breathing are acquired using a real‐time position monitoring system. After collecting a sufficiently large number of free breathing samples, a representative breathing pattern is constructed by estimating the average of the Fourier series coefficients corresponding to each breathing cycle. The patient is then instructed to follow the representative breathing pattern as closely as possible. The new method of respiratory training was tested on four volunteers (non‐patients). For each volunteer, the data for free and trained breathing was analyzed to calculate the RMS error of period and displacement with respect to representative waveform. Results: The average of RMS errors in time period and displacement for trained breathing was 2.32 seconds and 4.32 cm respectively. Similarly, average of RMS errors for free breathing was found to be 3.27 seconds and 7.9 cm. The reduction in the errors from free breathing to trained breathing was approximately 30 percent in time period and 45 percent in displacement. Conclusion: This tool provides valuable insights into identifying respiratory training methods that are customized for each subject. Further analysis of this methodology will be performed by developing alternate user interfaces and investigating the data from a larger set of volunteers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024813829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024813829&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2760517

DO - 10.1118/1.2760517

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024813829

VL - 34

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -