SU‐FF‐J‐131: Improving Quantitation in Serial PET/CT with Improved Image Registration and Intra‐Patient Metabolic Correction

B. Cannon, D. Schwartz, B. Moeller, L. Zhang, L. Dong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The goal of this study is to explore the use of deformable image registration in conjunction with an internal metabolic reference to improve quantitative treatment response assessment using F18‐FDG PET/CT. Method and Materials: To account for anatomic and positional changes, pre‐ and post‐radiotherapy (RT) PET/CT studies were aligned with a deformable image registration technique to the planning CT (PCT). Consequently, both CT‐ and PET‐based regions‐of‐interest on all co‐registered image sets can be used to determine uptake for the same anatomic volumes. The brainstem, contoured on PCT, was selected as an internal metabolic normalization structure to correct for study dependent variations; particularly, inconsistent injection‐to‐imaging time. The mean SUV was calculated using a threshold contour (40% of maximum) method, created on the pre‐RT PET/CT images. Student's t‐tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed for metabolically corrected (uptake ratio of tumor to brainstem) and uncorrected mean and maximum SUV. Results: A statistically detectable separation was improved between responding and non‐responding patients using the corrected post‐RT mean SUV for the threshold contour (P=0.017 vs. P=0.00); while no worsening was seen for the maximum SUV (P<0.00 vs. P<0.00). Reduction of uptake the between pre‐ and post‐RT images was only significant for the maximum SUV (P=0.033) and subsequently improved when corrected with the metabolic reference (P=0.012). Finally, ROC analysis of the maximum corrected post‐RT SUV showed improvement in specificity (94% vs. 85%) and similar results for the sensitivity (83% vs. 83%) level. However, ROC analyses of corrected and uncorrected mean post‐RT SUV derived from the threshold contour did not show improvement. Conclusions: Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that correction of SUV with an internal metabolic reference may improve the quantitative potential of F18‐FDG PET/CT. Conflict of Interest: Research sponsored by Varian Medical Systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2506-2507
Number of pages2
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

ROC Curve
Brain Stem Neoplasms
Planning Techniques
Conflict of Interest
Brain Stem
Students
Research
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐J‐131 : Improving Quantitation in Serial PET/CT with Improved Image Registration and Intra‐Patient Metabolic Correction. / Cannon, B.; Schwartz, D.; Moeller, B.; Zhang, L.; Dong, L.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 01.01.2009, p. 2506-2507.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2a461c6043024df1bce5742098459f22,
title = "SU‐FF‐J‐131: Improving Quantitation in Serial PET/CT with Improved Image Registration and Intra‐Patient Metabolic Correction",
abstract = "Purpose: The goal of this study is to explore the use of deformable image registration in conjunction with an internal metabolic reference to improve quantitative treatment response assessment using F18‐FDG PET/CT. Method and Materials: To account for anatomic and positional changes, pre‐ and post‐radiotherapy (RT) PET/CT studies were aligned with a deformable image registration technique to the planning CT (PCT). Consequently, both CT‐ and PET‐based regions‐of‐interest on all co‐registered image sets can be used to determine uptake for the same anatomic volumes. The brainstem, contoured on PCT, was selected as an internal metabolic normalization structure to correct for study dependent variations; particularly, inconsistent injection‐to‐imaging time. The mean SUV was calculated using a threshold contour (40{\%} of maximum) method, created on the pre‐RT PET/CT images. Student's t‐tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed for metabolically corrected (uptake ratio of tumor to brainstem) and uncorrected mean and maximum SUV. Results: A statistically detectable separation was improved between responding and non‐responding patients using the corrected post‐RT mean SUV for the threshold contour (P=0.017 vs. P=0.00); while no worsening was seen for the maximum SUV (P<0.00 vs. P<0.00). Reduction of uptake the between pre‐ and post‐RT images was only significant for the maximum SUV (P=0.033) and subsequently improved when corrected with the metabolic reference (P=0.012). Finally, ROC analysis of the maximum corrected post‐RT SUV showed improvement in specificity (94{\%} vs. 85{\%}) and similar results for the sensitivity (83{\%} vs. 83{\%}) level. However, ROC analyses of corrected and uncorrected mean post‐RT SUV derived from the threshold contour did not show improvement. Conclusions: Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that correction of SUV with an internal metabolic reference may improve the quantitative potential of F18‐FDG PET/CT. Conflict of Interest: Research sponsored by Varian Medical Systems.",
author = "B. Cannon and D. Schwartz and B. Moeller and L. Zhang and L. Dong",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3181423",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2506--2507",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐J‐131

T2 - Improving Quantitation in Serial PET/CT with Improved Image Registration and Intra‐Patient Metabolic Correction

AU - Cannon, B.

AU - Schwartz, D.

AU - Moeller, B.

AU - Zhang, L.

AU - Dong, L.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Purpose: The goal of this study is to explore the use of deformable image registration in conjunction with an internal metabolic reference to improve quantitative treatment response assessment using F18‐FDG PET/CT. Method and Materials: To account for anatomic and positional changes, pre‐ and post‐radiotherapy (RT) PET/CT studies were aligned with a deformable image registration technique to the planning CT (PCT). Consequently, both CT‐ and PET‐based regions‐of‐interest on all co‐registered image sets can be used to determine uptake for the same anatomic volumes. The brainstem, contoured on PCT, was selected as an internal metabolic normalization structure to correct for study dependent variations; particularly, inconsistent injection‐to‐imaging time. The mean SUV was calculated using a threshold contour (40% of maximum) method, created on the pre‐RT PET/CT images. Student's t‐tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed for metabolically corrected (uptake ratio of tumor to brainstem) and uncorrected mean and maximum SUV. Results: A statistically detectable separation was improved between responding and non‐responding patients using the corrected post‐RT mean SUV for the threshold contour (P=0.017 vs. P=0.00); while no worsening was seen for the maximum SUV (P<0.00 vs. P<0.00). Reduction of uptake the between pre‐ and post‐RT images was only significant for the maximum SUV (P=0.033) and subsequently improved when corrected with the metabolic reference (P=0.012). Finally, ROC analysis of the maximum corrected post‐RT SUV showed improvement in specificity (94% vs. 85%) and similar results for the sensitivity (83% vs. 83%) level. However, ROC analyses of corrected and uncorrected mean post‐RT SUV derived from the threshold contour did not show improvement. Conclusions: Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that correction of SUV with an internal metabolic reference may improve the quantitative potential of F18‐FDG PET/CT. Conflict of Interest: Research sponsored by Varian Medical Systems.

AB - Purpose: The goal of this study is to explore the use of deformable image registration in conjunction with an internal metabolic reference to improve quantitative treatment response assessment using F18‐FDG PET/CT. Method and Materials: To account for anatomic and positional changes, pre‐ and post‐radiotherapy (RT) PET/CT studies were aligned with a deformable image registration technique to the planning CT (PCT). Consequently, both CT‐ and PET‐based regions‐of‐interest on all co‐registered image sets can be used to determine uptake for the same anatomic volumes. The brainstem, contoured on PCT, was selected as an internal metabolic normalization structure to correct for study dependent variations; particularly, inconsistent injection‐to‐imaging time. The mean SUV was calculated using a threshold contour (40% of maximum) method, created on the pre‐RT PET/CT images. Student's t‐tests and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed for metabolically corrected (uptake ratio of tumor to brainstem) and uncorrected mean and maximum SUV. Results: A statistically detectable separation was improved between responding and non‐responding patients using the corrected post‐RT mean SUV for the threshold contour (P=0.017 vs. P=0.00); while no worsening was seen for the maximum SUV (P<0.00 vs. P<0.00). Reduction of uptake the between pre‐ and post‐RT images was only significant for the maximum SUV (P=0.033) and subsequently improved when corrected with the metabolic reference (P=0.012). Finally, ROC analysis of the maximum corrected post‐RT SUV showed improvement in specificity (94% vs. 85%) and similar results for the sensitivity (83% vs. 83%) level. However, ROC analyses of corrected and uncorrected mean post‐RT SUV derived from the threshold contour did not show improvement. Conclusions: Multiple lines of evidence demonstrate that correction of SUV with an internal metabolic reference may improve the quantitative potential of F18‐FDG PET/CT. Conflict of Interest: Research sponsored by Varian Medical Systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024804756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024804756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3181423

DO - 10.1118/1.3181423

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024804756

VL - 36

SP - 2506

EP - 2507

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -