SU‐FF‐T‐183: Dosimetric Verification of a Commercial Research Irradiator

M. Wiesmeyer, M. Schaefer, M. Hile, S. Stojadinovic, J. Williamson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To present a collection of simple tests that can be used to verify the dosimetric characteristics of the MDS Nordion Gammacell 40 Extractor Low Dose‐Rate Research Irradiator. Method and Materials: The manufacturer specifies that the irradiator is provided with two 61.1 TBq Cesium 137 sources that together produce a central dose rate of 1.10 Gy/minute ± 15% in its sample tray. In the central 260 mm diameter by 100 mm height region, the specified dose uniformity is ± 7%. Custom measurement jigs were made to fit inside the irradiator's sample trays and assemblies. Ionization chamber readings were made to determine exposure rate constancy and timer errors. Radiochromic film was used to measure dose and dose rate constancy, the attenuation of manufacturer‐provided attenuators, depth dose characteristics in Solid Water™, and uniformity of dose across the sample tray. Thermoluminescent devices (TLD's) were assessed as an alternate means of measuring dose and dose rate constancy. Results: The exposure rate was constant down to two seconds and timer error was about 1.4 seconds. Film measurements showed that dose reduction for the attenuation filters (33%, 60%, 80%) is within 3% of specifications. Film measurements in a central 10×10 cm area showed dose uniformity within about 2%. Depth doses in Solid Water™ showed a variation of about 10%. Film and TLD's yielded similarly accurate dose measurements and constancy estimates. Conclusion: Our facility's irradiator operates within the manufacturer's specifications except for dose variance with depth which may be somewhat greater than 7%. Although the manufacturer provides basic dosimetric information about each irradiator, it is advantageous to verify and expand this information. As with linacs, irradiators must certainly differ from machine to machine and change over time. It is prudent when doing research using these devices to validate their performance under their conditions of usage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Equipment and Supplies
Research
Cesium
Water
Reading

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐FF‐T‐183 : Dosimetric Verification of a Commercial Research Irradiator. / Wiesmeyer, M.; Schaefer, M.; Hile, M.; Stojadinovic, S.; Williamson, J.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 34, No. 6, 2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiesmeyer, M. ; Schaefer, M. ; Hile, M. ; Stojadinovic, S. ; Williamson, J. / SU‐FF‐T‐183 : Dosimetric Verification of a Commercial Research Irradiator. In: Medical Physics. 2007 ; Vol. 34, No. 6.
@article{9d29a22a423e49ee8963e08ec95298ee,
title = "SU‐FF‐T‐183: Dosimetric Verification of a Commercial Research Irradiator",
abstract = "Purpose: To present a collection of simple tests that can be used to verify the dosimetric characteristics of the MDS Nordion Gammacell 40 Extractor Low Dose‐Rate Research Irradiator. Method and Materials: The manufacturer specifies that the irradiator is provided with two 61.1 TBq Cesium 137 sources that together produce a central dose rate of 1.10 Gy/minute ± 15{\%} in its sample tray. In the central 260 mm diameter by 100 mm height region, the specified dose uniformity is ± 7{\%}. Custom measurement jigs were made to fit inside the irradiator's sample trays and assemblies. Ionization chamber readings were made to determine exposure rate constancy and timer errors. Radiochromic film was used to measure dose and dose rate constancy, the attenuation of manufacturer‐provided attenuators, depth dose characteristics in Solid Water™, and uniformity of dose across the sample tray. Thermoluminescent devices (TLD's) were assessed as an alternate means of measuring dose and dose rate constancy. Results: The exposure rate was constant down to two seconds and timer error was about 1.4 seconds. Film measurements showed that dose reduction for the attenuation filters (33{\%}, 60{\%}, 80{\%}) is within 3{\%} of specifications. Film measurements in a central 10×10 cm area showed dose uniformity within about 2{\%}. Depth doses in Solid Water™ showed a variation of about 10{\%}. Film and TLD's yielded similarly accurate dose measurements and constancy estimates. Conclusion: Our facility's irradiator operates within the manufacturer's specifications except for dose variance with depth which may be somewhat greater than 7{\%}. Although the manufacturer provides basic dosimetric information about each irradiator, it is advantageous to verify and expand this information. As with linacs, irradiators must certainly differ from machine to machine and change over time. It is prudent when doing research using these devices to validate their performance under their conditions of usage.",
author = "M. Wiesmeyer and M. Schaefer and M. Hile and S. Stojadinovic and J. Williamson",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1118/1.2760842",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐T‐183

T2 - Dosimetric Verification of a Commercial Research Irradiator

AU - Wiesmeyer, M.

AU - Schaefer, M.

AU - Hile, M.

AU - Stojadinovic, S.

AU - Williamson, J.

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Purpose: To present a collection of simple tests that can be used to verify the dosimetric characteristics of the MDS Nordion Gammacell 40 Extractor Low Dose‐Rate Research Irradiator. Method and Materials: The manufacturer specifies that the irradiator is provided with two 61.1 TBq Cesium 137 sources that together produce a central dose rate of 1.10 Gy/minute ± 15% in its sample tray. In the central 260 mm diameter by 100 mm height region, the specified dose uniformity is ± 7%. Custom measurement jigs were made to fit inside the irradiator's sample trays and assemblies. Ionization chamber readings were made to determine exposure rate constancy and timer errors. Radiochromic film was used to measure dose and dose rate constancy, the attenuation of manufacturer‐provided attenuators, depth dose characteristics in Solid Water™, and uniformity of dose across the sample tray. Thermoluminescent devices (TLD's) were assessed as an alternate means of measuring dose and dose rate constancy. Results: The exposure rate was constant down to two seconds and timer error was about 1.4 seconds. Film measurements showed that dose reduction for the attenuation filters (33%, 60%, 80%) is within 3% of specifications. Film measurements in a central 10×10 cm area showed dose uniformity within about 2%. Depth doses in Solid Water™ showed a variation of about 10%. Film and TLD's yielded similarly accurate dose measurements and constancy estimates. Conclusion: Our facility's irradiator operates within the manufacturer's specifications except for dose variance with depth which may be somewhat greater than 7%. Although the manufacturer provides basic dosimetric information about each irradiator, it is advantageous to verify and expand this information. As with linacs, irradiators must certainly differ from machine to machine and change over time. It is prudent when doing research using these devices to validate their performance under their conditions of usage.

AB - Purpose: To present a collection of simple tests that can be used to verify the dosimetric characteristics of the MDS Nordion Gammacell 40 Extractor Low Dose‐Rate Research Irradiator. Method and Materials: The manufacturer specifies that the irradiator is provided with two 61.1 TBq Cesium 137 sources that together produce a central dose rate of 1.10 Gy/minute ± 15% in its sample tray. In the central 260 mm diameter by 100 mm height region, the specified dose uniformity is ± 7%. Custom measurement jigs were made to fit inside the irradiator's sample trays and assemblies. Ionization chamber readings were made to determine exposure rate constancy and timer errors. Radiochromic film was used to measure dose and dose rate constancy, the attenuation of manufacturer‐provided attenuators, depth dose characteristics in Solid Water™, and uniformity of dose across the sample tray. Thermoluminescent devices (TLD's) were assessed as an alternate means of measuring dose and dose rate constancy. Results: The exposure rate was constant down to two seconds and timer error was about 1.4 seconds. Film measurements showed that dose reduction for the attenuation filters (33%, 60%, 80%) is within 3% of specifications. Film measurements in a central 10×10 cm area showed dose uniformity within about 2%. Depth doses in Solid Water™ showed a variation of about 10%. Film and TLD's yielded similarly accurate dose measurements and constancy estimates. Conclusion: Our facility's irradiator operates within the manufacturer's specifications except for dose variance with depth which may be somewhat greater than 7%. Although the manufacturer provides basic dosimetric information about each irradiator, it is advantageous to verify and expand this information. As with linacs, irradiators must certainly differ from machine to machine and change over time. It is prudent when doing research using these devices to validate their performance under their conditions of usage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024816097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024816097&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2760842

DO - 10.1118/1.2760842

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024816097

VL - 34

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -