SU‐FF‐T‐66: A Technique for Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

F. Yin, L. Marks, Z. Wang, J. Kirkpatrick, J. Wu, S. Yoo, N. Larrier, J. Meyer, C. Willett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and assess a technique using cone‐beam CT (CBCT) to localize treatment targets for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Material and Methods: Patients selected for SBRT had 3‐D or 4‐D CT simulation with immobilization. GTV, CTV, ITV, and PTV were identified for treatment planning. Intensity‐modulated radiation beams, multiple 3‐D conformal beams, or dynamic conformal shaped arcs were designed (physician preference) and delivered using a Varian 21EX with 120‐leaf MLC. Pre‐treatment CBCT images (acquired over sixty seconds) were registered to the planning CT based on target soft tissue and bony structures. After the physician confirmed the potential deviations of the treatment target, the couch was automatically shifted for positioning correction. Radiographic images (kV, MV or CBCT) were taken before and after beam delivery to assess for potential intra‐fraction motion. Results: Five patients with lung, liver, and spine lesions received 18 fractions (all 3 fractions except one 6 fractions) using this technique. Pre‐treatment CBCT images were successfully obtained for 17 fractions. Compared to traditional 2D matching using bony structures (tumor are usually not visible), use of CBCT, which is essentially imaging ITV, is able to correct target deviation from 1 mm to 15 mm with an average of 5 mm. The comparison on pre‐treatment and post‐treatment radiographic images demonstrated an average 2 mm deviation (ranging from 0–4 mm), suggesting that better immobilization might further improve the positioning accuracy. Typical total “in‐room” times for the patients are about 1 hour. Conclusion: CBCT‐guided SBRT is reasonable and allows for alignment based on 3‐D anatomical information prior to treatment. Partially supported by a Varian research grant.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume33
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006

Fingerprint

Radiotherapy
Immobilization
Physicians
Organized Financing
Therapeutics
Spine
Radiation
Lung
Liver
Research
Neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Yin, F., Marks, L., Wang, Z., Kirkpatrick, J., Wu, J., Yoo, S., ... Willett, C. (2006). SU‐FF‐T‐66: A Technique for Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Medical Physics, 33(6). https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2240992

SU‐FF‐T‐66 : A Technique for Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. / Yin, F.; Marks, L.; Wang, Z.; Kirkpatrick, J.; Wu, J.; Yoo, S.; Larrier, N.; Meyer, J.; Willett, C.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 33, No. 6, 2006.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yin, F, Marks, L, Wang, Z, Kirkpatrick, J, Wu, J, Yoo, S, Larrier, N, Meyer, J & Willett, C 2006, 'SU‐FF‐T‐66: A Technique for Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy', Medical Physics, vol. 33, no. 6. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2240992
Yin, F. ; Marks, L. ; Wang, Z. ; Kirkpatrick, J. ; Wu, J. ; Yoo, S. ; Larrier, N. ; Meyer, J. ; Willett, C. / SU‐FF‐T‐66 : A Technique for Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. In: Medical Physics. 2006 ; Vol. 33, No. 6.
@article{93f22d2f8ecf465798a9f43dee54edf3,
title = "SU‐FF‐T‐66: A Technique for Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy",
abstract = "Purpose: To develop and assess a technique using cone‐beam CT (CBCT) to localize treatment targets for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Material and Methods: Patients selected for SBRT had 3‐D or 4‐D CT simulation with immobilization. GTV, CTV, ITV, and PTV were identified for treatment planning. Intensity‐modulated radiation beams, multiple 3‐D conformal beams, or dynamic conformal shaped arcs were designed (physician preference) and delivered using a Varian 21EX with 120‐leaf MLC. Pre‐treatment CBCT images (acquired over sixty seconds) were registered to the planning CT based on target soft tissue and bony structures. After the physician confirmed the potential deviations of the treatment target, the couch was automatically shifted for positioning correction. Radiographic images (kV, MV or CBCT) were taken before and after beam delivery to assess for potential intra‐fraction motion. Results: Five patients with lung, liver, and spine lesions received 18 fractions (all 3 fractions except one 6 fractions) using this technique. Pre‐treatment CBCT images were successfully obtained for 17 fractions. Compared to traditional 2D matching using bony structures (tumor are usually not visible), use of CBCT, which is essentially imaging ITV, is able to correct target deviation from 1 mm to 15 mm with an average of 5 mm. The comparison on pre‐treatment and post‐treatment radiographic images demonstrated an average 2 mm deviation (ranging from 0–4 mm), suggesting that better immobilization might further improve the positioning accuracy. Typical total “in‐room” times for the patients are about 1 hour. Conclusion: CBCT‐guided SBRT is reasonable and allows for alignment based on 3‐D anatomical information prior to treatment. Partially supported by a Varian research grant.",
author = "F. Yin and L. Marks and Z. Wang and J. Kirkpatrick and J. Wu and S. Yoo and N. Larrier and J. Meyer and C. Willett",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1118/1.2240992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐FF‐T‐66

T2 - A Technique for Cone‐Beam CT‐Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

AU - Yin, F.

AU - Marks, L.

AU - Wang, Z.

AU - Kirkpatrick, J.

AU - Wu, J.

AU - Yoo, S.

AU - Larrier, N.

AU - Meyer, J.

AU - Willett, C.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Purpose: To develop and assess a technique using cone‐beam CT (CBCT) to localize treatment targets for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Material and Methods: Patients selected for SBRT had 3‐D or 4‐D CT simulation with immobilization. GTV, CTV, ITV, and PTV were identified for treatment planning. Intensity‐modulated radiation beams, multiple 3‐D conformal beams, or dynamic conformal shaped arcs were designed (physician preference) and delivered using a Varian 21EX with 120‐leaf MLC. Pre‐treatment CBCT images (acquired over sixty seconds) were registered to the planning CT based on target soft tissue and bony structures. After the physician confirmed the potential deviations of the treatment target, the couch was automatically shifted for positioning correction. Radiographic images (kV, MV or CBCT) were taken before and after beam delivery to assess for potential intra‐fraction motion. Results: Five patients with lung, liver, and spine lesions received 18 fractions (all 3 fractions except one 6 fractions) using this technique. Pre‐treatment CBCT images were successfully obtained for 17 fractions. Compared to traditional 2D matching using bony structures (tumor are usually not visible), use of CBCT, which is essentially imaging ITV, is able to correct target deviation from 1 mm to 15 mm with an average of 5 mm. The comparison on pre‐treatment and post‐treatment radiographic images demonstrated an average 2 mm deviation (ranging from 0–4 mm), suggesting that better immobilization might further improve the positioning accuracy. Typical total “in‐room” times for the patients are about 1 hour. Conclusion: CBCT‐guided SBRT is reasonable and allows for alignment based on 3‐D anatomical information prior to treatment. Partially supported by a Varian research grant.

AB - Purpose: To develop and assess a technique using cone‐beam CT (CBCT) to localize treatment targets for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Material and Methods: Patients selected for SBRT had 3‐D or 4‐D CT simulation with immobilization. GTV, CTV, ITV, and PTV were identified for treatment planning. Intensity‐modulated radiation beams, multiple 3‐D conformal beams, or dynamic conformal shaped arcs were designed (physician preference) and delivered using a Varian 21EX with 120‐leaf MLC. Pre‐treatment CBCT images (acquired over sixty seconds) were registered to the planning CT based on target soft tissue and bony structures. After the physician confirmed the potential deviations of the treatment target, the couch was automatically shifted for positioning correction. Radiographic images (kV, MV or CBCT) were taken before and after beam delivery to assess for potential intra‐fraction motion. Results: Five patients with lung, liver, and spine lesions received 18 fractions (all 3 fractions except one 6 fractions) using this technique. Pre‐treatment CBCT images were successfully obtained for 17 fractions. Compared to traditional 2D matching using bony structures (tumor are usually not visible), use of CBCT, which is essentially imaging ITV, is able to correct target deviation from 1 mm to 15 mm with an average of 5 mm. The comparison on pre‐treatment and post‐treatment radiographic images demonstrated an average 2 mm deviation (ranging from 0–4 mm), suggesting that better immobilization might further improve the positioning accuracy. Typical total “in‐room” times for the patients are about 1 hour. Conclusion: CBCT‐guided SBRT is reasonable and allows for alignment based on 3‐D anatomical information prior to treatment. Partially supported by a Varian research grant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36148995335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36148995335&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.2240992

DO - 10.1118/1.2240992

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:36148995335

VL - 33

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -