SU‐GG‐T‐489: Impact of the Fraction Size on the Efficiency of Hypoxia‐Targeting IMRTTreatment. Single Fraction Simulation Study

M. Axente, P. Lin, A. Pugachev

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the relative gain in local tumor control that can be achieved by using a heterogeneous dose distribution designed to deliver higher doses of radiation to the hypoxic subvolumes as imaged with non‐invasive modalities. Here we are focusing on the single‐fraction effect of such heterogeneous doses as opposed to the whole multi‐fraction treatment. Method and Materials: Starting with a distribution of microvessels representative of tumor tissue and using planar simulation of oxygen diffusion, we created a microscopic 2D model of tumor oxygenation. To simulate targeting hypoxic areas with increased radiation doses, we implemented a continuous adaptive, non‐linear modulation scheme where the dose boost derived from the oxygen partial pressure distribution is added to the baseline fraction prescription. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear‐quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. To determine relative effectiveness of a hypoxia‐targeting modulation scheme, corresponding tumor cell survival fraction was compared to that of treatments delivering the same average dose to the lesion uniformly. Results: For the low‐dose range (2–3 Gy fraction) hypoxia‐targeting treatments did not perform better than the treatments delivering the same average dose uniformly. That points to the fact that while assuming that normal tissue complications are constant over the two delivery strategies, there is no therapeutic gain from targeting hypoxic volumes alone versus escalating the tumor total dose, at low fraction doses. On the other hand, for higher prescription doses (6–8 Gy fraction and above) the effectiveness of hypoxia‐targeting treatment increases. Conclusion: The therapeutic gain that can be achieved by targeting hypoxia with increased doses of radiation depends greatly on the size of the radiation dose fraction. Our results indicate that this therapeutic gain would be higher for hypofractionated dose regimens with the dose per fraction exceeding 6 Gy than for conventional treatments utilizing 2Gy fraction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Radiation
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Prescriptions
Oxygen
Partial Pressure
Microvessels
Cell Survival

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

SU‐GG‐T‐489 : Impact of the Fraction Size on the Efficiency of Hypoxia‐Targeting IMRTTreatment. Single Fraction Simulation Study. / Axente, M.; Lin, P.; Pugachev, A.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 37, No. 6, 01.01.2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70ab118005544d858686baa7993076fe,
title = "SU‐GG‐T‐489: Impact of the Fraction Size on the Efficiency of Hypoxia‐Targeting IMRTTreatment. Single Fraction Simulation Study",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the relative gain in local tumor control that can be achieved by using a heterogeneous dose distribution designed to deliver higher doses of radiation to the hypoxic subvolumes as imaged with non‐invasive modalities. Here we are focusing on the single‐fraction effect of such heterogeneous doses as opposed to the whole multi‐fraction treatment. Method and Materials: Starting with a distribution of microvessels representative of tumor tissue and using planar simulation of oxygen diffusion, we created a microscopic 2D model of tumor oxygenation. To simulate targeting hypoxic areas with increased radiation doses, we implemented a continuous adaptive, non‐linear modulation scheme where the dose boost derived from the oxygen partial pressure distribution is added to the baseline fraction prescription. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear‐quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. To determine relative effectiveness of a hypoxia‐targeting modulation scheme, corresponding tumor cell survival fraction was compared to that of treatments delivering the same average dose to the lesion uniformly. Results: For the low‐dose range (2–3 Gy fraction) hypoxia‐targeting treatments did not perform better than the treatments delivering the same average dose uniformly. That points to the fact that while assuming that normal tissue complications are constant over the two delivery strategies, there is no therapeutic gain from targeting hypoxic volumes alone versus escalating the tumor total dose, at low fraction doses. On the other hand, for higher prescription doses (6–8 Gy fraction and above) the effectiveness of hypoxia‐targeting treatment increases. Conclusion: The therapeutic gain that can be achieved by targeting hypoxia with increased doses of radiation depends greatly on the size of the radiation dose fraction. Our results indicate that this therapeutic gain would be higher for hypofractionated dose regimens with the dose per fraction exceeding 6 Gy than for conventional treatments utilizing 2Gy fraction.",
author = "M. Axente and P. Lin and A. Pugachev",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1118/1.3468887",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SU‐GG‐T‐489

T2 - Impact of the Fraction Size on the Efficiency of Hypoxia‐Targeting IMRTTreatment. Single Fraction Simulation Study

AU - Axente, M.

AU - Lin, P.

AU - Pugachev, A.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the relative gain in local tumor control that can be achieved by using a heterogeneous dose distribution designed to deliver higher doses of radiation to the hypoxic subvolumes as imaged with non‐invasive modalities. Here we are focusing on the single‐fraction effect of such heterogeneous doses as opposed to the whole multi‐fraction treatment. Method and Materials: Starting with a distribution of microvessels representative of tumor tissue and using planar simulation of oxygen diffusion, we created a microscopic 2D model of tumor oxygenation. To simulate targeting hypoxic areas with increased radiation doses, we implemented a continuous adaptive, non‐linear modulation scheme where the dose boost derived from the oxygen partial pressure distribution is added to the baseline fraction prescription. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear‐quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. To determine relative effectiveness of a hypoxia‐targeting modulation scheme, corresponding tumor cell survival fraction was compared to that of treatments delivering the same average dose to the lesion uniformly. Results: For the low‐dose range (2–3 Gy fraction) hypoxia‐targeting treatments did not perform better than the treatments delivering the same average dose uniformly. That points to the fact that while assuming that normal tissue complications are constant over the two delivery strategies, there is no therapeutic gain from targeting hypoxic volumes alone versus escalating the tumor total dose, at low fraction doses. On the other hand, for higher prescription doses (6–8 Gy fraction and above) the effectiveness of hypoxia‐targeting treatment increases. Conclusion: The therapeutic gain that can be achieved by targeting hypoxia with increased doses of radiation depends greatly on the size of the radiation dose fraction. Our results indicate that this therapeutic gain would be higher for hypofractionated dose regimens with the dose per fraction exceeding 6 Gy than for conventional treatments utilizing 2Gy fraction.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the relative gain in local tumor control that can be achieved by using a heterogeneous dose distribution designed to deliver higher doses of radiation to the hypoxic subvolumes as imaged with non‐invasive modalities. Here we are focusing on the single‐fraction effect of such heterogeneous doses as opposed to the whole multi‐fraction treatment. Method and Materials: Starting with a distribution of microvessels representative of tumor tissue and using planar simulation of oxygen diffusion, we created a microscopic 2D model of tumor oxygenation. To simulate targeting hypoxic areas with increased radiation doses, we implemented a continuous adaptive, non‐linear modulation scheme where the dose boost derived from the oxygen partial pressure distribution is added to the baseline fraction prescription. Tumor cell radiation response was evaluated using linear‐quadratic model taking into account individual cell oxygenation levels. To determine relative effectiveness of a hypoxia‐targeting modulation scheme, corresponding tumor cell survival fraction was compared to that of treatments delivering the same average dose to the lesion uniformly. Results: For the low‐dose range (2–3 Gy fraction) hypoxia‐targeting treatments did not perform better than the treatments delivering the same average dose uniformly. That points to the fact that while assuming that normal tissue complications are constant over the two delivery strategies, there is no therapeutic gain from targeting hypoxic volumes alone versus escalating the tumor total dose, at low fraction doses. On the other hand, for higher prescription doses (6–8 Gy fraction and above) the effectiveness of hypoxia‐targeting treatment increases. Conclusion: The therapeutic gain that can be achieved by targeting hypoxia with increased doses of radiation depends greatly on the size of the radiation dose fraction. Our results indicate that this therapeutic gain would be higher for hypofractionated dose regimens with the dose per fraction exceeding 6 Gy than for conventional treatments utilizing 2Gy fraction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85024826936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85024826936&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3468887

DO - 10.1118/1.3468887

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85024826936

VL - 37

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -