Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life

Tracy Balboni, Michael Balboni, M. Elizabeth Paulk, Andrea Phelps, Alexi Wright, John Peteet, Susan Block, Chris Lathan, Tyler Vanderweele, Holly Prigerson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

121 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although spiritual care is associated with less aggressive medical care at the end of life (EOL), it remains infrequent. It is unclear if the omission of spiritual care impacts EOL costs. METHODS: A prospective, multisite study of 339 advanced cancer patients accrued subjects from September 2002 to August 2007 from an outpatient setting and followed them until death. Spiritual care was measured by patients' reports that the health care team supported their religious/spiritual needs. EOL costs in the last week were compared among patients reporting that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported versus those who reported that their needs were well supported. Analyses were adjusted for confounders (eg, EOL discussions). RESULTS: Patients reporting that their religious/spiritual needs were inadequately supported by clinic staff were less likely to receive a week or more of hospice (54% vs 72.8%; P =.01) and more likely to die in an intensive care unit (ICU) (5.1% vs 1.0%, P =.03). Among minorities and high religious coping patients, those reporting poorly supported religious/spiritual needs received more ICU care (11.3% vs 1.2%, P =.03 and 13.1% vs 1.6%, P =.02, respectively), received less hospice (43.% vs 75.3% ≤1 week of hospice, P =.01 and 45.3% vs 73.1%, P =.007, respectively), and had increased ICU deaths (11.2% vs 1.2%, P =.03 and 7.7% vs 0.6%, P =.009, respectively). EOL costs were higher when patients reported that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported ($4947 vs $2833, P =.03), particularly among minorities ($6533 vs $2276, P =.02) and high religious copers ($6344 vs $2431, P =.005). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients reporting that their spiritual needs are not well supported by the health care team have higher EOL costs, particularly among minorities and high religious coping patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)5383-5391
Number of pages9
JournalCancer
Volume117
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011

Fingerprint

Health Care Costs
Hospices
Neoplasms
Intensive Care Units
Costs and Cost Analysis
Patient Care Team
Terminal Care
Outpatients
Prospective Studies

Keywords

  • end of life
  • medical costs
  • palliative care
  • spiritual care
  • spirituality/religion
  • supportive care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Balboni, T., Balboni, M., Paulk, M. E., Phelps, A., Wright, A., Peteet, J., ... Prigerson, H. (2011). Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life. Cancer, 117(23), 5383-5391. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26221

Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life. / Balboni, Tracy; Balboni, Michael; Paulk, M. Elizabeth; Phelps, Andrea; Wright, Alexi; Peteet, John; Block, Susan; Lathan, Chris; Vanderweele, Tyler; Prigerson, Holly.

In: Cancer, Vol. 117, No. 23, 01.12.2011, p. 5383-5391.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Balboni, T, Balboni, M, Paulk, ME, Phelps, A, Wright, A, Peteet, J, Block, S, Lathan, C, Vanderweele, T & Prigerson, H 2011, 'Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life', Cancer, vol. 117, no. 23, pp. 5383-5391. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26221
Balboni, Tracy ; Balboni, Michael ; Paulk, M. Elizabeth ; Phelps, Andrea ; Wright, Alexi ; Peteet, John ; Block, Susan ; Lathan, Chris ; Vanderweele, Tyler ; Prigerson, Holly. / Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life. In: Cancer. 2011 ; Vol. 117, No. 23. pp. 5383-5391.
@article{6734ea46ce5e4012b7ce8a85d86bfbf8,
title = "Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Although spiritual care is associated with less aggressive medical care at the end of life (EOL), it remains infrequent. It is unclear if the omission of spiritual care impacts EOL costs. METHODS: A prospective, multisite study of 339 advanced cancer patients accrued subjects from September 2002 to August 2007 from an outpatient setting and followed them until death. Spiritual care was measured by patients' reports that the health care team supported their religious/spiritual needs. EOL costs in the last week were compared among patients reporting that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported versus those who reported that their needs were well supported. Analyses were adjusted for confounders (eg, EOL discussions). RESULTS: Patients reporting that their religious/spiritual needs were inadequately supported by clinic staff were less likely to receive a week or more of hospice (54{\%} vs 72.8{\%}; P =.01) and more likely to die in an intensive care unit (ICU) (5.1{\%} vs 1.0{\%}, P =.03). Among minorities and high religious coping patients, those reporting poorly supported religious/spiritual needs received more ICU care (11.3{\%} vs 1.2{\%}, P =.03 and 13.1{\%} vs 1.6{\%}, P =.02, respectively), received less hospice (43.{\%} vs 75.3{\%} ≤1 week of hospice, P =.01 and 45.3{\%} vs 73.1{\%}, P =.007, respectively), and had increased ICU deaths (11.2{\%} vs 1.2{\%}, P =.03 and 7.7{\%} vs 0.6{\%}, P =.009, respectively). EOL costs were higher when patients reported that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported ($4947 vs $2833, P =.03), particularly among minorities ($6533 vs $2276, P =.02) and high religious copers ($6344 vs $2431, P =.005). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients reporting that their spiritual needs are not well supported by the health care team have higher EOL costs, particularly among minorities and high religious coping patients.",
keywords = "end of life, medical costs, palliative care, spiritual care, spirituality/religion, supportive care",
author = "Tracy Balboni and Michael Balboni and Paulk, {M. Elizabeth} and Andrea Phelps and Alexi Wright and John Peteet and Susan Block and Chris Lathan and Tyler Vanderweele and Holly Prigerson",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/cncr.26221",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "5383--5391",
journal = "Cancer",
issn = "0008-543X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Support of cancer patients' spiritual needs and associations with medical care costs at the end of life

AU - Balboni, Tracy

AU - Balboni, Michael

AU - Paulk, M. Elizabeth

AU - Phelps, Andrea

AU - Wright, Alexi

AU - Peteet, John

AU - Block, Susan

AU - Lathan, Chris

AU - Vanderweele, Tyler

AU - Prigerson, Holly

PY - 2011/12/1

Y1 - 2011/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Although spiritual care is associated with less aggressive medical care at the end of life (EOL), it remains infrequent. It is unclear if the omission of spiritual care impacts EOL costs. METHODS: A prospective, multisite study of 339 advanced cancer patients accrued subjects from September 2002 to August 2007 from an outpatient setting and followed them until death. Spiritual care was measured by patients' reports that the health care team supported their religious/spiritual needs. EOL costs in the last week were compared among patients reporting that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported versus those who reported that their needs were well supported. Analyses were adjusted for confounders (eg, EOL discussions). RESULTS: Patients reporting that their religious/spiritual needs were inadequately supported by clinic staff were less likely to receive a week or more of hospice (54% vs 72.8%; P =.01) and more likely to die in an intensive care unit (ICU) (5.1% vs 1.0%, P =.03). Among minorities and high religious coping patients, those reporting poorly supported religious/spiritual needs received more ICU care (11.3% vs 1.2%, P =.03 and 13.1% vs 1.6%, P =.02, respectively), received less hospice (43.% vs 75.3% ≤1 week of hospice, P =.01 and 45.3% vs 73.1%, P =.007, respectively), and had increased ICU deaths (11.2% vs 1.2%, P =.03 and 7.7% vs 0.6%, P =.009, respectively). EOL costs were higher when patients reported that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported ($4947 vs $2833, P =.03), particularly among minorities ($6533 vs $2276, P =.02) and high religious copers ($6344 vs $2431, P =.005). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients reporting that their spiritual needs are not well supported by the health care team have higher EOL costs, particularly among minorities and high religious coping patients.

AB - BACKGROUND: Although spiritual care is associated with less aggressive medical care at the end of life (EOL), it remains infrequent. It is unclear if the omission of spiritual care impacts EOL costs. METHODS: A prospective, multisite study of 339 advanced cancer patients accrued subjects from September 2002 to August 2007 from an outpatient setting and followed them until death. Spiritual care was measured by patients' reports that the health care team supported their religious/spiritual needs. EOL costs in the last week were compared among patients reporting that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported versus those who reported that their needs were well supported. Analyses were adjusted for confounders (eg, EOL discussions). RESULTS: Patients reporting that their religious/spiritual needs were inadequately supported by clinic staff were less likely to receive a week or more of hospice (54% vs 72.8%; P =.01) and more likely to die in an intensive care unit (ICU) (5.1% vs 1.0%, P =.03). Among minorities and high religious coping patients, those reporting poorly supported religious/spiritual needs received more ICU care (11.3% vs 1.2%, P =.03 and 13.1% vs 1.6%, P =.02, respectively), received less hospice (43.% vs 75.3% ≤1 week of hospice, P =.01 and 45.3% vs 73.1%, P =.007, respectively), and had increased ICU deaths (11.2% vs 1.2%, P =.03 and 7.7% vs 0.6%, P =.009, respectively). EOL costs were higher when patients reported that their spiritual needs were inadequately supported ($4947 vs $2833, P =.03), particularly among minorities ($6533 vs $2276, P =.02) and high religious copers ($6344 vs $2431, P =.005). CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients reporting that their spiritual needs are not well supported by the health care team have higher EOL costs, particularly among minorities and high religious coping patients.

KW - end of life

KW - medical costs

KW - palliative care

KW - spiritual care

KW - spirituality/religion

KW - supportive care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80755177094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80755177094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/cncr.26221

DO - 10.1002/cncr.26221

M3 - Article

VL - 117

SP - 5383

EP - 5391

JO - Cancer

JF - Cancer

SN - 0008-543X

IS - 23

ER -