Surgical findings with the tinted AcrySof intraocular lens in children

Cynthia L. Beauchamp, David R. Stager, David R. Weakley, Xiaohong Wang, Joost Felius

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The AcrySof foldable acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) has become an accepted and frequent means of treating pediatric aphakia. A new version of this lens with blue-light filtering properties purports to offer superior retinal protection. We describe our experience with this tinted lens and compare it to findings with the standard, nontinted IOL. Methods: A chart review identified 29 eyes of 21 children (tinted lens group; age 11 months to 13 years) who had the tinted IOL implanted. The standard lens group consisted of 38 eyes (31 patients; age 11 months to 15 years). Most eyes had an intact posterior capsule at the time of implantation. Results: The incidence of postoperative inflammation was fairly high in both groups (71% in the tinted lens group, 60% in the standard lens group). The tinted lens group showed a higher incidence of transient inflammation than the standard lens group (p = 0.03) but the rates of nontransient sequelae (posterior synechiae, iris synechiae, membranes formation, capsule, or IOL opacification) were similar (66% versus 47%; p = 0.11). Posterior capsule opacification occurred in 15 eyes in the tinted lens group and 16 eyes in the standard lens group (p = 0.15) but was visually significant in only 10 and 11 eyes, respectively (p = 0.77). Conclusions: Transient inflammation is higher with implantation of tinted versus nontinted IOLs, but long-term inflammatory sequelae are roughly equal, as is the rate of posterior capsule opacification. The question as to whether the chromophore in the tinted lens caused the higher incidence of transient inflammation is unresolved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-169
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of AAPOS
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

Fingerprint

Intraocular Lenses
Lenses
Capsule Opacification
Inflammation
Capsules
Incidence
Aphakia
Iris
Pediatrics
Light

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Surgical findings with the tinted AcrySof intraocular lens in children. / Beauchamp, Cynthia L.; Stager, David R.; Weakley, David R.; Wang, Xiaohong; Felius, Joost.

In: Journal of AAPOS, Vol. 11, No. 2, 04.2007, p. 166-169.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Beauchamp, Cynthia L. ; Stager, David R. ; Weakley, David R. ; Wang, Xiaohong ; Felius, Joost. / Surgical findings with the tinted AcrySof intraocular lens in children. In: Journal of AAPOS. 2007 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 166-169.
@article{36f5d066ef7441f2b11cbb37c611bb6b,
title = "Surgical findings with the tinted AcrySof intraocular lens in children",
abstract = "Introduction: The AcrySof foldable acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) has become an accepted and frequent means of treating pediatric aphakia. A new version of this lens with blue-light filtering properties purports to offer superior retinal protection. We describe our experience with this tinted lens and compare it to findings with the standard, nontinted IOL. Methods: A chart review identified 29 eyes of 21 children (tinted lens group; age 11 months to 13 years) who had the tinted IOL implanted. The standard lens group consisted of 38 eyes (31 patients; age 11 months to 15 years). Most eyes had an intact posterior capsule at the time of implantation. Results: The incidence of postoperative inflammation was fairly high in both groups (71{\%} in the tinted lens group, 60{\%} in the standard lens group). The tinted lens group showed a higher incidence of transient inflammation than the standard lens group (p = 0.03) but the rates of nontransient sequelae (posterior synechiae, iris synechiae, membranes formation, capsule, or IOL opacification) were similar (66{\%} versus 47{\%}; p = 0.11). Posterior capsule opacification occurred in 15 eyes in the tinted lens group and 16 eyes in the standard lens group (p = 0.15) but was visually significant in only 10 and 11 eyes, respectively (p = 0.77). Conclusions: Transient inflammation is higher with implantation of tinted versus nontinted IOLs, but long-term inflammatory sequelae are roughly equal, as is the rate of posterior capsule opacification. The question as to whether the chromophore in the tinted lens caused the higher incidence of transient inflammation is unresolved.",
author = "Beauchamp, {Cynthia L.} and Stager, {David R.} and Weakley, {David R.} and Xiaohong Wang and Joost Felius",
year = "2007",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.08.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "166--169",
journal = "Journal of AAPOS",
issn = "1091-8531",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical findings with the tinted AcrySof intraocular lens in children

AU - Beauchamp, Cynthia L.

AU - Stager, David R.

AU - Weakley, David R.

AU - Wang, Xiaohong

AU - Felius, Joost

PY - 2007/4

Y1 - 2007/4

N2 - Introduction: The AcrySof foldable acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) has become an accepted and frequent means of treating pediatric aphakia. A new version of this lens with blue-light filtering properties purports to offer superior retinal protection. We describe our experience with this tinted lens and compare it to findings with the standard, nontinted IOL. Methods: A chart review identified 29 eyes of 21 children (tinted lens group; age 11 months to 13 years) who had the tinted IOL implanted. The standard lens group consisted of 38 eyes (31 patients; age 11 months to 15 years). Most eyes had an intact posterior capsule at the time of implantation. Results: The incidence of postoperative inflammation was fairly high in both groups (71% in the tinted lens group, 60% in the standard lens group). The tinted lens group showed a higher incidence of transient inflammation than the standard lens group (p = 0.03) but the rates of nontransient sequelae (posterior synechiae, iris synechiae, membranes formation, capsule, or IOL opacification) were similar (66% versus 47%; p = 0.11). Posterior capsule opacification occurred in 15 eyes in the tinted lens group and 16 eyes in the standard lens group (p = 0.15) but was visually significant in only 10 and 11 eyes, respectively (p = 0.77). Conclusions: Transient inflammation is higher with implantation of tinted versus nontinted IOLs, but long-term inflammatory sequelae are roughly equal, as is the rate of posterior capsule opacification. The question as to whether the chromophore in the tinted lens caused the higher incidence of transient inflammation is unresolved.

AB - Introduction: The AcrySof foldable acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) has become an accepted and frequent means of treating pediatric aphakia. A new version of this lens with blue-light filtering properties purports to offer superior retinal protection. We describe our experience with this tinted lens and compare it to findings with the standard, nontinted IOL. Methods: A chart review identified 29 eyes of 21 children (tinted lens group; age 11 months to 13 years) who had the tinted IOL implanted. The standard lens group consisted of 38 eyes (31 patients; age 11 months to 15 years). Most eyes had an intact posterior capsule at the time of implantation. Results: The incidence of postoperative inflammation was fairly high in both groups (71% in the tinted lens group, 60% in the standard lens group). The tinted lens group showed a higher incidence of transient inflammation than the standard lens group (p = 0.03) but the rates of nontransient sequelae (posterior synechiae, iris synechiae, membranes formation, capsule, or IOL opacification) were similar (66% versus 47%; p = 0.11). Posterior capsule opacification occurred in 15 eyes in the tinted lens group and 16 eyes in the standard lens group (p = 0.15) but was visually significant in only 10 and 11 eyes, respectively (p = 0.77). Conclusions: Transient inflammation is higher with implantation of tinted versus nontinted IOLs, but long-term inflammatory sequelae are roughly equal, as is the rate of posterior capsule opacification. The question as to whether the chromophore in the tinted lens caused the higher incidence of transient inflammation is unresolved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047099837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047099837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.08.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.08.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 17416326

AN - SCOPUS:34047099837

VL - 11

SP - 166

EP - 169

JO - Journal of AAPOS

JF - Journal of AAPOS

SN - 1091-8531

IS - 2

ER -