Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease

Jay D. Raman, Margaret S Pearle

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Although many ureteral stones pass spontaneously, some facilitated by the use of medical expulsive agents, surgical intervention for ureteral calculi remains common. For most ureteral stones, ureteroscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) are the primarily treatment modalities; the choice of optimal modality for a particular stone depends on size, composition and location of the stone. While a few randomized trials and systematic reviews have shown that both treatment modalities are acceptable choices for stones in all ureteral locations, ureteroscopy is associated with the highest stone free rates with the fewest procedures, albeit at a cost of a higher, although still low, complication rate. The use of medical expulsive agents has been shown to improve clearance of fragments after SWL. However, the use of stents in association with SWL provides no advantage with regard to stone free rates or need for emergency attention, but does increase lower urinary tract symptoms. Stent placement after URS has also been shown in randomized clinical trials to be unnecessary after routine, uncomplicated.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEvidence-Based Urology
PublisherWiley-Blackwell
Pages225-235
Number of pages11
ISBN (Print)9781405185943
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 9 2010

Fingerprint

Ureteral Diseases
Ureteroscopy
Lithotripsy
Stents
Ureteral Calculi
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms
Emergencies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Outcomes
  • Randomized clinical trials
  • Shock wave lithotripsy
  • Ureteroscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Raman, J. D., & Pearle, M. S. (2010). Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease. In Evidence-Based Urology (pp. 225-235). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444323146.ch24

Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease. / Raman, Jay D.; Pearle, Margaret S.

Evidence-Based Urology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. p. 225-235.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Raman, JD & Pearle, MS 2010, Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease. in Evidence-Based Urology. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444323146.ch24
Raman JD, Pearle MS. Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease. In Evidence-Based Urology. Wiley-Blackwell. 2010. p. 225-235 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444323146.ch24
Raman, Jay D. ; Pearle, Margaret S. / Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease. Evidence-Based Urology. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. pp. 225-235
@inbook{492bdad33bfc47f2bbabbe193348724b,
title = "Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease",
abstract = "Although many ureteral stones pass spontaneously, some facilitated by the use of medical expulsive agents, surgical intervention for ureteral calculi remains common. For most ureteral stones, ureteroscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) are the primarily treatment modalities; the choice of optimal modality for a particular stone depends on size, composition and location of the stone. While a few randomized trials and systematic reviews have shown that both treatment modalities are acceptable choices for stones in all ureteral locations, ureteroscopy is associated with the highest stone free rates with the fewest procedures, albeit at a cost of a higher, although still low, complication rate. The use of medical expulsive agents has been shown to improve clearance of fragments after SWL. However, the use of stents in association with SWL provides no advantage with regard to stone free rates or need for emergency attention, but does increase lower urinary tract symptoms. Stent placement after URS has also been shown in randomized clinical trials to be unnecessary after routine, uncomplicated.",
keywords = "Outcomes, Randomized clinical trials, Shock wave lithotripsy, Ureteroscopy",
author = "Raman, {Jay D.} and Pearle, {Margaret S}",
year = "2010",
month = "7",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1002/9781444323146.ch24",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781405185943",
pages = "225--235",
booktitle = "Evidence-Based Urology",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Surgical Management of Ureteral Stone Disease

AU - Raman, Jay D.

AU - Pearle, Margaret S

PY - 2010/7/9

Y1 - 2010/7/9

N2 - Although many ureteral stones pass spontaneously, some facilitated by the use of medical expulsive agents, surgical intervention for ureteral calculi remains common. For most ureteral stones, ureteroscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) are the primarily treatment modalities; the choice of optimal modality for a particular stone depends on size, composition and location of the stone. While a few randomized trials and systematic reviews have shown that both treatment modalities are acceptable choices for stones in all ureteral locations, ureteroscopy is associated with the highest stone free rates with the fewest procedures, albeit at a cost of a higher, although still low, complication rate. The use of medical expulsive agents has been shown to improve clearance of fragments after SWL. However, the use of stents in association with SWL provides no advantage with regard to stone free rates or need for emergency attention, but does increase lower urinary tract symptoms. Stent placement after URS has also been shown in randomized clinical trials to be unnecessary after routine, uncomplicated.

AB - Although many ureteral stones pass spontaneously, some facilitated by the use of medical expulsive agents, surgical intervention for ureteral calculi remains common. For most ureteral stones, ureteroscopy (URS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) are the primarily treatment modalities; the choice of optimal modality for a particular stone depends on size, composition and location of the stone. While a few randomized trials and systematic reviews have shown that both treatment modalities are acceptable choices for stones in all ureteral locations, ureteroscopy is associated with the highest stone free rates with the fewest procedures, albeit at a cost of a higher, although still low, complication rate. The use of medical expulsive agents has been shown to improve clearance of fragments after SWL. However, the use of stents in association with SWL provides no advantage with regard to stone free rates or need for emergency attention, but does increase lower urinary tract symptoms. Stent placement after URS has also been shown in randomized clinical trials to be unnecessary after routine, uncomplicated.

KW - Outcomes

KW - Randomized clinical trials

KW - Shock wave lithotripsy

KW - Ureteroscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885539508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885539508&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781444323146.ch24

DO - 10.1002/9781444323146.ch24

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781405185943

SP - 225

EP - 235

BT - Evidence-Based Urology

PB - Wiley-Blackwell

ER -