Surgical preparation

Are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery

L. Brubaker, H. J. Litman, L. Rickey, K. Y. Dyer, A. D. Markland, L. Sirls, P. Norton, E. Casiano, M. F R Paraiso, C. Ghetti, D. D. Rahn, J. W. Kusek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis Patient preparedness for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is associated with improvements in post-operative satisfaction, symptoms and quality of life (QoL). This planned secondary analysis examined the association of patient preparedness with surgical outcomes, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. Methods The ValUE trial compared the effect of pre-operative urodynamic studies with a standardized office evaluation of outcomes of SUI surgery at 1 year. In addition to primary and secondary outcome measures, patient satisfaction with treatment was measured using a five-point Likert scale (very dissatisfied to very satisfied) that queried subjects to rate the treatment's effect on overall incontinence, urge incontinence, SUI, and frequency. Preparedness for surgery was assessed using an 11-question Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ). Results Based on PPQ question 11, 4 out of 5 (81 %) of women reported they "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that they were prepared for surgery. Selected demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in unprepared and prepared women. Among SUI severity baseline measures, total UDI score was significantly but weakly associated with preparedness (question 11 of the PPQ; Spearman's r=0.13, p=0.001). Although preparedness for surgery was not associated with successful outcomes, it was associated with satisfaction (rs=0.11, p=0.02) and larger PGI-S improvement (increase; p=0.008). Conclusions Approximately half (48 %) of women "strongly agreed" that they felt prepared for SUI. Women with higher pre-operative preparedness scores were more satisfied, although surgical outcomes did not differ.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)41-46
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Stress Urinary Incontinence
Quality of Life
Urge Urinary Incontinence
Urodynamics
Patient Satisfaction
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Mid-urethral sling
  • Randomized trial
  • Satisfaction
  • Stress incontinence
  • Surgical outcomes
  • Urodynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Brubaker, L., Litman, H. J., Rickey, L., Dyer, K. Y., Markland, A. D., Sirls, L., ... Kusek, J. W. (2014). Surgical preparation: Are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, 25(1), 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x

Surgical preparation : Are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery. / Brubaker, L.; Litman, H. J.; Rickey, L.; Dyer, K. Y.; Markland, A. D.; Sirls, L.; Norton, P.; Casiano, E.; Paraiso, M. F R; Ghetti, C.; Rahn, D. D.; Kusek, J. W.

In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 41-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brubaker, L, Litman, HJ, Rickey, L, Dyer, KY, Markland, AD, Sirls, L, Norton, P, Casiano, E, Paraiso, MFR, Ghetti, C, Rahn, DD & Kusek, JW 2014, 'Surgical preparation: Are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery', International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x
Brubaker, L. ; Litman, H. J. ; Rickey, L. ; Dyer, K. Y. ; Markland, A. D. ; Sirls, L. ; Norton, P. ; Casiano, E. ; Paraiso, M. F R ; Ghetti, C. ; Rahn, D. D. ; Kusek, J. W. / Surgical preparation : Are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery. In: International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 41-46.
@article{f9de938945cf49749b569fe1b2ee959d,
title = "Surgical preparation: Are patients {"}ready{"} for stress urinary incontinence surgery",
abstract = "Introduction and hypothesis Patient preparedness for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is associated with improvements in post-operative satisfaction, symptoms and quality of life (QoL). This planned secondary analysis examined the association of patient preparedness with surgical outcomes, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. Methods The ValUE trial compared the effect of pre-operative urodynamic studies with a standardized office evaluation of outcomes of SUI surgery at 1 year. In addition to primary and secondary outcome measures, patient satisfaction with treatment was measured using a five-point Likert scale (very dissatisfied to very satisfied) that queried subjects to rate the treatment's effect on overall incontinence, urge incontinence, SUI, and frequency. Preparedness for surgery was assessed using an 11-question Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ). Results Based on PPQ question 11, 4 out of 5 (81 {\%}) of women reported they {"}agreed{"} or {"}strongly agreed{"} that they were prepared for surgery. Selected demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in unprepared and prepared women. Among SUI severity baseline measures, total UDI score was significantly but weakly associated with preparedness (question 11 of the PPQ; Spearman's r=0.13, p=0.001). Although preparedness for surgery was not associated with successful outcomes, it was associated with satisfaction (rs=0.11, p=0.02) and larger PGI-S improvement (increase; p=0.008). Conclusions Approximately half (48 {\%}) of women {"}strongly agreed{"} that they felt prepared for SUI. Women with higher pre-operative preparedness scores were more satisfied, although surgical outcomes did not differ.",
keywords = "Mid-urethral sling, Randomized trial, Satisfaction, Stress incontinence, Surgical outcomes, Urodynamics",
author = "L. Brubaker and Litman, {H. J.} and L. Rickey and Dyer, {K. Y.} and Markland, {A. D.} and L. Sirls and P. Norton and E. Casiano and Paraiso, {M. F R} and C. Ghetti and Rahn, {D. D.} and Kusek, {J. W.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "41--46",
journal = "International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction",
issn = "0937-3462",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical preparation

T2 - Are patients "ready" for stress urinary incontinence surgery

AU - Brubaker, L.

AU - Litman, H. J.

AU - Rickey, L.

AU - Dyer, K. Y.

AU - Markland, A. D.

AU - Sirls, L.

AU - Norton, P.

AU - Casiano, E.

AU - Paraiso, M. F R

AU - Ghetti, C.

AU - Rahn, D. D.

AU - Kusek, J. W.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Introduction and hypothesis Patient preparedness for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is associated with improvements in post-operative satisfaction, symptoms and quality of life (QoL). This planned secondary analysis examined the association of patient preparedness with surgical outcomes, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. Methods The ValUE trial compared the effect of pre-operative urodynamic studies with a standardized office evaluation of outcomes of SUI surgery at 1 year. In addition to primary and secondary outcome measures, patient satisfaction with treatment was measured using a five-point Likert scale (very dissatisfied to very satisfied) that queried subjects to rate the treatment's effect on overall incontinence, urge incontinence, SUI, and frequency. Preparedness for surgery was assessed using an 11-question Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ). Results Based on PPQ question 11, 4 out of 5 (81 %) of women reported they "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that they were prepared for surgery. Selected demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in unprepared and prepared women. Among SUI severity baseline measures, total UDI score was significantly but weakly associated with preparedness (question 11 of the PPQ; Spearman's r=0.13, p=0.001). Although preparedness for surgery was not associated with successful outcomes, it was associated with satisfaction (rs=0.11, p=0.02) and larger PGI-S improvement (increase; p=0.008). Conclusions Approximately half (48 %) of women "strongly agreed" that they felt prepared for SUI. Women with higher pre-operative preparedness scores were more satisfied, although surgical outcomes did not differ.

AB - Introduction and hypothesis Patient preparedness for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) surgery is associated with improvements in post-operative satisfaction, symptoms and quality of life (QoL). This planned secondary analysis examined the association of patient preparedness with surgical outcomes, treatment satisfaction and quality of life. Methods The ValUE trial compared the effect of pre-operative urodynamic studies with a standardized office evaluation of outcomes of SUI surgery at 1 year. In addition to primary and secondary outcome measures, patient satisfaction with treatment was measured using a five-point Likert scale (very dissatisfied to very satisfied) that queried subjects to rate the treatment's effect on overall incontinence, urge incontinence, SUI, and frequency. Preparedness for surgery was assessed using an 11-question Patient Preparedness Questionnaire (PPQ). Results Based on PPQ question 11, 4 out of 5 (81 %) of women reported they "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that they were prepared for surgery. Selected demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in unprepared and prepared women. Among SUI severity baseline measures, total UDI score was significantly but weakly associated with preparedness (question 11 of the PPQ; Spearman's r=0.13, p=0.001). Although preparedness for surgery was not associated with successful outcomes, it was associated with satisfaction (rs=0.11, p=0.02) and larger PGI-S improvement (increase; p=0.008). Conclusions Approximately half (48 %) of women "strongly agreed" that they felt prepared for SUI. Women with higher pre-operative preparedness scores were more satisfied, although surgical outcomes did not differ.

KW - Mid-urethral sling

KW - Randomized trial

KW - Satisfaction

KW - Stress incontinence

KW - Surgical outcomes

KW - Urodynamics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892765154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892765154&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x

DO - 10.1007/s00192-013-2184-x

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 41

EP - 46

JO - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

JF - International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

SN - 0937-3462

IS - 1

ER -