Surgical Treatment of Nonsyndromic Unicoronal Craniosynostosis

Jake Alford, Christopher A. Derderian, James M. Smartt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Unicoronal synostosis (UCS) remains one of the most difficult craniofacial conditions to treat. This review attempts to consolidate all existing literature from the past 25 years that has investigated surgical treatment of nonsyndromic UCS. Additional attention is paid to specific areas of controversy regarding surgical management and evaluation of UCS: outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) versus endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC), emergence of spring-associated cranioplasty for craniosynostosis, and morphologic assessment metrics. Methods: A literature search from 1992 to 2017 was performed with a defined search strategy and manual screening process. About 24 studies were included in the final review. Results: There is inconsistency among studies in measuring outcomes. Despite wide utilization, FOA produces mixed results, especially when looking at long-term outcomes. Preliminary data suggest advantages to using ESC over FOA with regard to facial symmetry, postoperative strabismus, and operating time. Distraction osteogenesis has long been utilized in Asia and is now being actively studied in the United States. Data on spring-assisted cranioplasty are lacking. Long-term results at skeletal maturity for many of these techniques are lacking. Discussion: Despite some promising results, methods of measurement are inconsistent and long-term data are lacking. All future research in this area would benefit from consistent and standardized reporting of data, including perioperative statistics and reproducible 3-dimensional computed tomography craniofacial measurements. Additionally, no definitive recommendations can be made until data at skeletal maturity are studied, and all studies would benefit from long-term follow-up data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1199-1207
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Synostosis
Craniosynostoses
Distraction Osteogenesis
Strabismus
Research Design
Therapeutics
Tomography

Keywords

  • Craniosynostosis
  • fronto-orbital advancement
  • strip craniectomy
  • synostosis
  • unicoronal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Surgical Treatment of Nonsyndromic Unicoronal Craniosynostosis. / Alford, Jake; Derderian, Christopher A.; Smartt, James M.

In: Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, Vol. 29, No. 5, 01.07.2018, p. 1199-1207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{95295d76fee94d348da124fa41e677e3,
title = "Surgical Treatment of Nonsyndromic Unicoronal Craniosynostosis",
abstract = "Purpose: Unicoronal synostosis (UCS) remains one of the most difficult craniofacial conditions to treat. This review attempts to consolidate all existing literature from the past 25 years that has investigated surgical treatment of nonsyndromic UCS. Additional attention is paid to specific areas of controversy regarding surgical management and evaluation of UCS: outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) versus endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC), emergence of spring-associated cranioplasty for craniosynostosis, and morphologic assessment metrics. Methods: A literature search from 1992 to 2017 was performed with a defined search strategy and manual screening process. About 24 studies were included in the final review. Results: There is inconsistency among studies in measuring outcomes. Despite wide utilization, FOA produces mixed results, especially when looking at long-term outcomes. Preliminary data suggest advantages to using ESC over FOA with regard to facial symmetry, postoperative strabismus, and operating time. Distraction osteogenesis has long been utilized in Asia and is now being actively studied in the United States. Data on spring-assisted cranioplasty are lacking. Long-term results at skeletal maturity for many of these techniques are lacking. Discussion: Despite some promising results, methods of measurement are inconsistent and long-term data are lacking. All future research in this area would benefit from consistent and standardized reporting of data, including perioperative statistics and reproducible 3-dimensional computed tomography craniofacial measurements. Additionally, no definitive recommendations can be made until data at skeletal maturity are studied, and all studies would benefit from long-term follow-up data.",
keywords = "Craniosynostosis, fronto-orbital advancement, strip craniectomy, synostosis, unicoronal",
author = "Jake Alford and Derderian, {Christopher A.} and Smartt, {James M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/SCS.0000000000004509",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1199--1207",
journal = "Journal of Craniofacial Surgery",
issn = "1049-2275",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical Treatment of Nonsyndromic Unicoronal Craniosynostosis

AU - Alford, Jake

AU - Derderian, Christopher A.

AU - Smartt, James M.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Purpose: Unicoronal synostosis (UCS) remains one of the most difficult craniofacial conditions to treat. This review attempts to consolidate all existing literature from the past 25 years that has investigated surgical treatment of nonsyndromic UCS. Additional attention is paid to specific areas of controversy regarding surgical management and evaluation of UCS: outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) versus endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC), emergence of spring-associated cranioplasty for craniosynostosis, and morphologic assessment metrics. Methods: A literature search from 1992 to 2017 was performed with a defined search strategy and manual screening process. About 24 studies were included in the final review. Results: There is inconsistency among studies in measuring outcomes. Despite wide utilization, FOA produces mixed results, especially when looking at long-term outcomes. Preliminary data suggest advantages to using ESC over FOA with regard to facial symmetry, postoperative strabismus, and operating time. Distraction osteogenesis has long been utilized in Asia and is now being actively studied in the United States. Data on spring-assisted cranioplasty are lacking. Long-term results at skeletal maturity for many of these techniques are lacking. Discussion: Despite some promising results, methods of measurement are inconsistent and long-term data are lacking. All future research in this area would benefit from consistent and standardized reporting of data, including perioperative statistics and reproducible 3-dimensional computed tomography craniofacial measurements. Additionally, no definitive recommendations can be made until data at skeletal maturity are studied, and all studies would benefit from long-term follow-up data.

AB - Purpose: Unicoronal synostosis (UCS) remains one of the most difficult craniofacial conditions to treat. This review attempts to consolidate all existing literature from the past 25 years that has investigated surgical treatment of nonsyndromic UCS. Additional attention is paid to specific areas of controversy regarding surgical management and evaluation of UCS: outcomes of fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) versus endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC), emergence of spring-associated cranioplasty for craniosynostosis, and morphologic assessment metrics. Methods: A literature search from 1992 to 2017 was performed with a defined search strategy and manual screening process. About 24 studies were included in the final review. Results: There is inconsistency among studies in measuring outcomes. Despite wide utilization, FOA produces mixed results, especially when looking at long-term outcomes. Preliminary data suggest advantages to using ESC over FOA with regard to facial symmetry, postoperative strabismus, and operating time. Distraction osteogenesis has long been utilized in Asia and is now being actively studied in the United States. Data on spring-assisted cranioplasty are lacking. Long-term results at skeletal maturity for many of these techniques are lacking. Discussion: Despite some promising results, methods of measurement are inconsistent and long-term data are lacking. All future research in this area would benefit from consistent and standardized reporting of data, including perioperative statistics and reproducible 3-dimensional computed tomography craniofacial measurements. Additionally, no definitive recommendations can be made until data at skeletal maturity are studied, and all studies would benefit from long-term follow-up data.

KW - Craniosynostosis

KW - fronto-orbital advancement

KW - strip craniectomy

KW - synostosis

KW - unicoronal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050178902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050178902&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004509

DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004509

M3 - Article

C2 - 29570518

AN - SCOPUS:85050178902

VL - 29

SP - 1199

EP - 1207

JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

SN - 1049-2275

IS - 5

ER -