Systematic Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: Robotic Techniques Compared With Laparoscopy and Laparotomy

Rajiv B. Gala, Rebecca Margulies, Adam Steinberg, Miles Murphy, James Lukban, Peter Jeppson, Sarit Aschkenazi, Cedric Olivera, Mary South, Lior Lowenstein, Joseph Schaffer, Ethan M. Balk, Vivian Sung

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

81 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group performed a systematic review of both randomized and observational studies to compare robotic vs nonrobotic surgical approaches (laparoscopic, abdominal, and vaginal) for treatment of both benign and malignant gynecologic indications to compare surgical and patient-centered outcomes, costs, and adverse events associated with the various surgical approaches. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to May 15, 2012, for English-language studies with terms related to robotic surgery and gynecology. Studies of any design that included at least 30 women who had undergone robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery were included for review. The literature yielded 1213 citations, of which 97 full-text articles were reviewed. Forty-four studies (30 comparative and 14 noncomparative) met eligibility criteria. Study data were extracted into structured electronic forms and reconciled by a second, independent reviewer. Our analysis revealed that, compared with open surgery, robotic surgery consistently confers shorter hospital stay. The proficiency plateau seems to be lower for robotic surgery than for conventional laparoscopy. Of the various gynecologic applications, there seems to be evidence that renders robotic techniques advantageous over traditional open surgery for management of endometrial cancer. However, insofar as superiority, conflicting data are obtained when comparing robotics vs laparoscopic techniques. Therefore, the specific method of minimally invasive surgery, whether conventional laparoscopy or robotic surgery, should be tailored to patient selection, surgeon ability, and equipment availability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-361
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Keywords

  • Gynecologic surgery
  • Learning curve
  • Robotic surgery
  • Systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Systematic Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: Robotic Techniques Compared With Laparoscopy and Laparotomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Gala, R. B., Margulies, R., Steinberg, A., Murphy, M., Lukban, J., Jeppson, P., Aschkenazi, S., Olivera, C., South, M., Lowenstein, L., Schaffer, J., Balk, E. M., & Sung, V. (2014). Systematic Review of Robotic Surgery in Gynecology: Robotic Techniques Compared With Laparoscopy and Laparotomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 21(3), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.11.010