Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices

Supriya Gupta; Prabhakar Rajiah; Erik H. Middlebrooks; Dhiraj Baruah; Brett W. Carter; Kirsteen R. Burton; Arindam Rano Chatterjee; Matthew M. Miller

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025

Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices

Supriya Gupta, Prabhakar Rajiah, Erik H. Middlebrooks, Dhiraj Baruah, Brett W. Carter, Kirsteen R. Burton, Arindam Rano Chatterjee, Matthew M. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Reviews of published scientific literature are a valuable resource that can underline best practices in medicine and clarify clinical controversies. Among the various types of reviews, the systematic review of the literature is ranked as the most rigorous since it is a high-level summary of existing evidence focused on answering a precise question. Systematic reviews employ a pre-defined protocol to identify relevant and trustworthy literature. Such reviews can accomplish several critical goals that are not easily achievable with typical empirical studies by allowing identification and discussion of best evidence, contradictory findings, and gaps in the literature. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Systematic Review Task Force convened to explore the methodology and practical considerations involved in performing a systematic review. This article provides a detailed and practical guide for performing a systematic review and discusses its applications in radiology.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1481-1490
Number of pages	10
Journal	Academic radiology
Volume	25
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025
State	Published - Nov 2018

Keywords

effective systematic review
radiology review
research methodology
systematic review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025

Cite this

@article{2b8d487d678f4336ab0b4498f4dc9598,

title = "Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices",

abstract = "Reviews of published scientific literature are a valuable resource that can underline best practices in medicine and clarify clinical controversies. Among the various types of reviews, the systematic review of the literature is ranked as the most rigorous since it is a high-level summary of existing evidence focused on answering a precise question. Systematic reviews employ a pre-defined protocol to identify relevant and trustworthy literature. Such reviews can accomplish several critical goals that are not easily achievable with typical empirical studies by allowing identification and discussion of best evidence, contradictory findings, and gaps in the literature. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Systematic Review Task Force convened to explore the methodology and practical considerations involved in performing a systematic review. This article provides a detailed and practical guide for performing a systematic review and discusses its applications in radiology.",

keywords = "effective systematic review, radiology review, research methodology, systematic review",

author = "Supriya Gupta and Prabhakar Rajiah and Middlebrooks, {Erik H.} and Dhiraj Baruah and Carter, {Brett W.} and Burton, {Kirsteen R.} and Chatterjee, {Arindam Rano} and Miller, {Matthew M.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2018",

year = "2018",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "25",

pages = "1481--1490",

journal = "Academic radiology",

issn = "1076-6332",

publisher = "Elsevier USA",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic Review of the Literature

T2 - Best Practices

AU - Gupta, Supriya

AU - Rajiah, Prabhakar

AU - Middlebrooks, Erik H.

AU - Baruah, Dhiraj

AU - Carter, Brett W.

AU - Burton, Kirsteen R.

AU - Chatterjee, Arindam Rano

AU - Miller, Matthew M.

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Reviews of published scientific literature are a valuable resource that can underline best practices in medicine and clarify clinical controversies. Among the various types of reviews, the systematic review of the literature is ranked as the most rigorous since it is a high-level summary of existing evidence focused on answering a precise question. Systematic reviews employ a pre-defined protocol to identify relevant and trustworthy literature. Such reviews can accomplish several critical goals that are not easily achievable with typical empirical studies by allowing identification and discussion of best evidence, contradictory findings, and gaps in the literature. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Systematic Review Task Force convened to explore the methodology and practical considerations involved in performing a systematic review. This article provides a detailed and practical guide for performing a systematic review and discusses its applications in radiology.

AB - Reviews of published scientific literature are a valuable resource that can underline best practices in medicine and clarify clinical controversies. Among the various types of reviews, the systematic review of the literature is ranked as the most rigorous since it is a high-level summary of existing evidence focused on answering a precise question. Systematic reviews employ a pre-defined protocol to identify relevant and trustworthy literature. Such reviews can accomplish several critical goals that are not easily achievable with typical empirical studies by allowing identification and discussion of best evidence, contradictory findings, and gaps in the literature. The Association of University Radiologists Radiology Research Alliance Systematic Review Task Force convened to explore the methodology and practical considerations involved in performing a systematic review. This article provides a detailed and practical guide for performing a systematic review and discusses its applications in radiology.

KW - effective systematic review

KW - radiology review

KW - research methodology

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050964023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050964023&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025

DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2018.04.025

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 30442379

AN - SCOPUS:85050964023

SN - 1076-6332

VL - 25

SP - 1481

EP - 1490

JO - Academic radiology

JF - Academic radiology

IS - 11

ER -

Systematic Review of the Literature: Best Practices

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this