Systolic blood pressure differences among pediatric epidemiological studies

David E Fixler, Judith A. Kautz, Kent Dana

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This report reviews the results of six large blood pressure surreys done on pediatric populations and points out factors responsible for differences in the blood pressure norms. The studies were selected on the basis of there being recent examinations of large numbers of children. Important differences in mean systolic pressures and 95th percentile rallies were found among the studies, which may be attributed to: 1) actual differences among the populations; 2) biases due to methodological differences; or 3) increased sampling variability with small sample sizes. Actual differences in pressures among the populations surveyed may be due to differences in geographic location, racial composition, or average body sizes. Discrepancies due to methodological biases may have occurred because of associated venipuncture or exercise stress on the day of the examination; differences in selection of blood pressure cuff sizes; differences in the number of measurements averaged. In several studies, small sample sizes for each age-race-sex subclass accounted for considerable variability of the 95th percentile value. The implication of this analysis is that before the 95th percentile norms for children of different ages, races, and sexes can be more firmly established, it is necessary to collect larger sample sizes controlling for known biasing factors and using a standardized methodology

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-7
Number of pages5
JournalHypertension
Volume2
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1980

Fingerprint

Epidemiologic Studies
Sample Size
Pediatrics
Blood Pressure
Geographic Locations
Phlebotomy
Population Dynamics
Body Size
Population
Exercise

Keywords

  • Blood pressure surveys
  • Childhood hypertension
  • Epidemiology
  • Hypertension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine

Cite this

Systolic blood pressure differences among pediatric epidemiological studies. / Fixler, David E; Kautz, Judith A.; Dana, Kent.

In: Hypertension, Vol. 2, No. 4, 1980, p. 3-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fixler, David E ; Kautz, Judith A. ; Dana, Kent. / Systolic blood pressure differences among pediatric epidemiological studies. In: Hypertension. 1980 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 3-7.
@article{2a833aa5fe4249598df458a5fd61bf60,
title = "Systolic blood pressure differences among pediatric epidemiological studies",
abstract = "This report reviews the results of six large blood pressure surreys done on pediatric populations and points out factors responsible for differences in the blood pressure norms. The studies were selected on the basis of there being recent examinations of large numbers of children. Important differences in mean systolic pressures and 95th percentile rallies were found among the studies, which may be attributed to: 1) actual differences among the populations; 2) biases due to methodological differences; or 3) increased sampling variability with small sample sizes. Actual differences in pressures among the populations surveyed may be due to differences in geographic location, racial composition, or average body sizes. Discrepancies due to methodological biases may have occurred because of associated venipuncture or exercise stress on the day of the examination; differences in selection of blood pressure cuff sizes; differences in the number of measurements averaged. In several studies, small sample sizes for each age-race-sex subclass accounted for considerable variability of the 95th percentile value. The implication of this analysis is that before the 95th percentile norms for children of different ages, races, and sexes can be more firmly established, it is necessary to collect larger sample sizes controlling for known biasing factors and using a standardized methodology",
keywords = "Blood pressure surveys, Childhood hypertension, Epidemiology, Hypertension",
author = "Fixler, {David E} and Kautz, {Judith A.} and Kent Dana",
year = "1980",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "3--7",
journal = "Hypertension",
issn = "0194-911X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systolic blood pressure differences among pediatric epidemiological studies

AU - Fixler, David E

AU - Kautz, Judith A.

AU - Dana, Kent

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - This report reviews the results of six large blood pressure surreys done on pediatric populations and points out factors responsible for differences in the blood pressure norms. The studies were selected on the basis of there being recent examinations of large numbers of children. Important differences in mean systolic pressures and 95th percentile rallies were found among the studies, which may be attributed to: 1) actual differences among the populations; 2) biases due to methodological differences; or 3) increased sampling variability with small sample sizes. Actual differences in pressures among the populations surveyed may be due to differences in geographic location, racial composition, or average body sizes. Discrepancies due to methodological biases may have occurred because of associated venipuncture or exercise stress on the day of the examination; differences in selection of blood pressure cuff sizes; differences in the number of measurements averaged. In several studies, small sample sizes for each age-race-sex subclass accounted for considerable variability of the 95th percentile value. The implication of this analysis is that before the 95th percentile norms for children of different ages, races, and sexes can be more firmly established, it is necessary to collect larger sample sizes controlling for known biasing factors and using a standardized methodology

AB - This report reviews the results of six large blood pressure surreys done on pediatric populations and points out factors responsible for differences in the blood pressure norms. The studies were selected on the basis of there being recent examinations of large numbers of children. Important differences in mean systolic pressures and 95th percentile rallies were found among the studies, which may be attributed to: 1) actual differences among the populations; 2) biases due to methodological differences; or 3) increased sampling variability with small sample sizes. Actual differences in pressures among the populations surveyed may be due to differences in geographic location, racial composition, or average body sizes. Discrepancies due to methodological biases may have occurred because of associated venipuncture or exercise stress on the day of the examination; differences in selection of blood pressure cuff sizes; differences in the number of measurements averaged. In several studies, small sample sizes for each age-race-sex subclass accounted for considerable variability of the 95th percentile value. The implication of this analysis is that before the 95th percentile norms for children of different ages, races, and sexes can be more firmly established, it is necessary to collect larger sample sizes controlling for known biasing factors and using a standardized methodology

KW - Blood pressure surveys

KW - Childhood hypertension

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Hypertension

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913806260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913806260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 3

EP - 7

JO - Hypertension

JF - Hypertension

SN - 0194-911X

IS - 4

ER -