Tap water for irrigation of lacerations

Beatrix Chandra Bansal, Robert A. Wiebe, Sebrina D. Perkins, Thomas J. Abramo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study was designed to compare the infection rates of simple lacerations irrigated with tap water versus sterile normal saline before repair. Patients with simple lacerations to an extremity that were less than 8 hours from injury were prospectively enrolled. Exclusions from the study were: dog bites, hand lacerations, immunocompromised patients, and those on antibiotics at the time of injury. Patients who qualified were randomized to receive tap water or normal saline for wound irrigation. Before and after irrigation, wound cultures were obtained. After the procedure was complete, patients were scheduled for a 48 hour follow-up wound check. A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to the normal saline group and 21 were assigned to receive tap water irrigation. There were 2 infected lacerations in both the tap water and normal saline groups. The organisms cultured from the wounds in both groups were similar and there was no difference in colony counts when tap water was used. The use of tap water for the irrigation of lacerations does not result in the growth of unusual organisms or increase the colony counts of organisms. Wound infection rates were the same in both groups. This pilot study suggests that the use of tap water for irrigation of wounds may be safe. Further validation is necessary.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-472
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

Lacerations
Water
Wounds and Injuries
Immunocompromised Host
Wound Infection
Bites and Stings
Extremities
Hand
Dogs
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Growth
Infection

Keywords

  • Injuries
  • Irrigation
  • Laceration repair
  • Wound infection
  • Wounds

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Tap water for irrigation of lacerations. / Bansal, Beatrix Chandra; Wiebe, Robert A.; Perkins, Sebrina D.; Abramo, Thomas J.

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 5, 01.01.2002, p. 469-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bansal, Beatrix Chandra ; Wiebe, Robert A. ; Perkins, Sebrina D. ; Abramo, Thomas J. / Tap water for irrigation of lacerations. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 20, No. 5. pp. 469-472.
@article{1e55bbb661134519b2f78db6acd45341,
title = "Tap water for irrigation of lacerations",
abstract = "This study was designed to compare the infection rates of simple lacerations irrigated with tap water versus sterile normal saline before repair. Patients with simple lacerations to an extremity that were less than 8 hours from injury were prospectively enrolled. Exclusions from the study were: dog bites, hand lacerations, immunocompromised patients, and those on antibiotics at the time of injury. Patients who qualified were randomized to receive tap water or normal saline for wound irrigation. Before and after irrigation, wound cultures were obtained. After the procedure was complete, patients were scheduled for a 48 hour follow-up wound check. A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to the normal saline group and 21 were assigned to receive tap water irrigation. There were 2 infected lacerations in both the tap water and normal saline groups. The organisms cultured from the wounds in both groups were similar and there was no difference in colony counts when tap water was used. The use of tap water for the irrigation of lacerations does not result in the growth of unusual organisms or increase the colony counts of organisms. Wound infection rates were the same in both groups. This pilot study suggests that the use of tap water for irrigation of wounds may be safe. Further validation is necessary.",
keywords = "Injuries, Irrigation, Laceration repair, Wound infection, Wounds",
author = "Bansal, {Beatrix Chandra} and Wiebe, {Robert A.} and Perkins, {Sebrina D.} and Abramo, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1053/ajem.2002.35501",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "469--472",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tap water for irrigation of lacerations

AU - Bansal, Beatrix Chandra

AU - Wiebe, Robert A.

AU - Perkins, Sebrina D.

AU - Abramo, Thomas J.

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - This study was designed to compare the infection rates of simple lacerations irrigated with tap water versus sterile normal saline before repair. Patients with simple lacerations to an extremity that were less than 8 hours from injury were prospectively enrolled. Exclusions from the study were: dog bites, hand lacerations, immunocompromised patients, and those on antibiotics at the time of injury. Patients who qualified were randomized to receive tap water or normal saline for wound irrigation. Before and after irrigation, wound cultures were obtained. After the procedure was complete, patients were scheduled for a 48 hour follow-up wound check. A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to the normal saline group and 21 were assigned to receive tap water irrigation. There were 2 infected lacerations in both the tap water and normal saline groups. The organisms cultured from the wounds in both groups were similar and there was no difference in colony counts when tap water was used. The use of tap water for the irrigation of lacerations does not result in the growth of unusual organisms or increase the colony counts of organisms. Wound infection rates were the same in both groups. This pilot study suggests that the use of tap water for irrigation of wounds may be safe. Further validation is necessary.

AB - This study was designed to compare the infection rates of simple lacerations irrigated with tap water versus sterile normal saline before repair. Patients with simple lacerations to an extremity that were less than 8 hours from injury were prospectively enrolled. Exclusions from the study were: dog bites, hand lacerations, immunocompromised patients, and those on antibiotics at the time of injury. Patients who qualified were randomized to receive tap water or normal saline for wound irrigation. Before and after irrigation, wound cultures were obtained. After the procedure was complete, patients were scheduled for a 48 hour follow-up wound check. A total of 46 patients were enrolled in the study. Twenty-four patients were randomized to the normal saline group and 21 were assigned to receive tap water irrigation. There were 2 infected lacerations in both the tap water and normal saline groups. The organisms cultured from the wounds in both groups were similar and there was no difference in colony counts when tap water was used. The use of tap water for the irrigation of lacerations does not result in the growth of unusual organisms or increase the colony counts of organisms. Wound infection rates were the same in both groups. This pilot study suggests that the use of tap water for irrigation of wounds may be safe. Further validation is necessary.

KW - Injuries

KW - Irrigation

KW - Laceration repair

KW - Wound infection

KW - Wounds

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036733182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036733182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/ajem.2002.35501

DO - 10.1053/ajem.2002.35501

M3 - Article

C2 - 12216046

AN - SCOPUS:0036733182

VL - 20

SP - 469

EP - 472

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 5

ER -