Techniques and uses of nosocomial infection surveillance in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977

T. Grace Emori, Robert W. Haley, Julia S. Garner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From personal interviews in a representative sample of hospitals, we found that 97 per cent of them had some type of infection surveillance system; most involved continuous, hospital-wide surveillance, written definitions of infections, active case-finding methods and basic analytic techniques. Infection control nurses spent an average of about half of their time on surveillance. In larger hospitals (≥ 200 beds), the heads of the infection surveillance and control programs reported a greater awareness of most nosocomial infections if they were in hospitals with more intensive surveillance systems, and most indicated that surveillance data were used for a variety of specific purposes. Although 81 percent of persons who described surveillance reported using surveillance data in inservice education, only 31 percent of U.S. staff nurses recalled its having been presented. "Clean" wound, surgeon-specific rates of surgical wound infection were reported back to surgeons in only 16 percent of the hospitals. Ninety-seven percent of the hospital administrators believed that surveillance data are not a hindrance in defending the hospital against litigation for alleged malpractice, and 65 percent considered the information more often a help.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)933-940
Number of pages8
JournalThe American journal of medicine
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1981

Fingerprint

Cross Infection
Infection Control
Nurses
Hospital Administrators
Surgical Wound Infection
Malpractice
Jurisprudence
Infection
Head
Interviews
Education
Wounds and Injuries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Techniques and uses of nosocomial infection surveillance in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977. / Emori, T. Grace; Haley, Robert W.; Garner, Julia S.

In: The American journal of medicine, Vol. 70, No. 4, 1981, p. 933-940.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{194006fe2798447da036ce5d825ab899,
title = "Techniques and uses of nosocomial infection surveillance in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977",
abstract = "From personal interviews in a representative sample of hospitals, we found that 97 per cent of them had some type of infection surveillance system; most involved continuous, hospital-wide surveillance, written definitions of infections, active case-finding methods and basic analytic techniques. Infection control nurses spent an average of about half of their time on surveillance. In larger hospitals (≥ 200 beds), the heads of the infection surveillance and control programs reported a greater awareness of most nosocomial infections if they were in hospitals with more intensive surveillance systems, and most indicated that surveillance data were used for a variety of specific purposes. Although 81 percent of persons who described surveillance reported using surveillance data in inservice education, only 31 percent of U.S. staff nurses recalled its having been presented. {"}Clean{"} wound, surgeon-specific rates of surgical wound infection were reported back to surgeons in only 16 percent of the hospitals. Ninety-seven percent of the hospital administrators believed that surveillance data are not a hindrance in defending the hospital against litigation for alleged malpractice, and 65 percent considered the information more often a help.",
author = "Emori, {T. Grace} and Haley, {Robert W.} and Garner, {Julia S.}",
year = "1981",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9343(81)90559-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "70",
pages = "933--940",
journal = "American Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0002-9343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Techniques and uses of nosocomial infection surveillance in U.S. hospitals, 1976-1977

AU - Emori, T. Grace

AU - Haley, Robert W.

AU - Garner, Julia S.

PY - 1981

Y1 - 1981

N2 - From personal interviews in a representative sample of hospitals, we found that 97 per cent of them had some type of infection surveillance system; most involved continuous, hospital-wide surveillance, written definitions of infections, active case-finding methods and basic analytic techniques. Infection control nurses spent an average of about half of their time on surveillance. In larger hospitals (≥ 200 beds), the heads of the infection surveillance and control programs reported a greater awareness of most nosocomial infections if they were in hospitals with more intensive surveillance systems, and most indicated that surveillance data were used for a variety of specific purposes. Although 81 percent of persons who described surveillance reported using surveillance data in inservice education, only 31 percent of U.S. staff nurses recalled its having been presented. "Clean" wound, surgeon-specific rates of surgical wound infection were reported back to surgeons in only 16 percent of the hospitals. Ninety-seven percent of the hospital administrators believed that surveillance data are not a hindrance in defending the hospital against litigation for alleged malpractice, and 65 percent considered the information more often a help.

AB - From personal interviews in a representative sample of hospitals, we found that 97 per cent of them had some type of infection surveillance system; most involved continuous, hospital-wide surveillance, written definitions of infections, active case-finding methods and basic analytic techniques. Infection control nurses spent an average of about half of their time on surveillance. In larger hospitals (≥ 200 beds), the heads of the infection surveillance and control programs reported a greater awareness of most nosocomial infections if they were in hospitals with more intensive surveillance systems, and most indicated that surveillance data were used for a variety of specific purposes. Although 81 percent of persons who described surveillance reported using surveillance data in inservice education, only 31 percent of U.S. staff nurses recalled its having been presented. "Clean" wound, surgeon-specific rates of surgical wound infection were reported back to surgeons in only 16 percent of the hospitals. Ninety-seven percent of the hospital administrators believed that surveillance data are not a hindrance in defending the hospital against litigation for alleged malpractice, and 65 percent considered the information more often a help.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019503855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019503855&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90559-3

DO - 10.1016/0002-9343(81)90559-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 7211930

AN - SCOPUS:0019503855

VL - 70

SP - 933

EP - 940

JO - American Journal of Medicine

JF - American Journal of Medicine

SN - 0002-9343

IS - 4

ER -