TY - JOUR
T1 - Techniques of intranasal steroid use
AU - Benninger, Michael S.
AU - Hadley, James A.
AU - Osguthorpe, J. David
AU - Marple, Bradley F.
AU - Leopold, Donald A.
AU - Derebery, M. Jennifer
AU - Hannley, Maureen
N1 - Funding Information:
Evidence-based review supported by a grant from GlaxoSmithKline.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004/1
Y1 - 2004/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of topical intranasal steroids (INS) sprays for the treatment of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis may be limited by lack of instruction in the optimal spray technique. To determine whether the technique used affects the efficacy and safety of the product, this review of evidence had the goal of identifying and establishing a preferred method of applying INS sprays. STUDY DESIGN: A MEDLINE search of pertinent literature on 7 INS and 1 intranasal antihistamine spray preparations conducted with the use of appropriate search terms, yielded an initial 121 articles, 29 of which were identified as appropriate for review and grading for quality of evidence. RESULTS: The analysis provided no definitive evidence regarding how best to instruct patients to use INS or antihistamine spray devices. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a lack of clear evidence regarding instructions to maximize efficacy and safety of these drugs, the panel recommended a 7-step standard technique.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of topical intranasal steroids (INS) sprays for the treatment of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis may be limited by lack of instruction in the optimal spray technique. To determine whether the technique used affects the efficacy and safety of the product, this review of evidence had the goal of identifying and establishing a preferred method of applying INS sprays. STUDY DESIGN: A MEDLINE search of pertinent literature on 7 INS and 1 intranasal antihistamine spray preparations conducted with the use of appropriate search terms, yielded an initial 121 articles, 29 of which were identified as appropriate for review and grading for quality of evidence. RESULTS: The analysis provided no definitive evidence regarding how best to instruct patients to use INS or antihistamine spray devices. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of a lack of clear evidence regarding instructions to maximize efficacy and safety of these drugs, the panel recommended a 7-step standard technique.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1642536302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1642536302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.10.007
DO - 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.10.007
M3 - Article
C2 - 14726906
AN - SCOPUS:1642536302
SN - 0194-5998
VL - 130
SP - 5
EP - 24
JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
IS - 1
ER -