Technology-assisted patient access to clinical information: An evaluation framework for blue button

Timothy P. Hogan, Kim M. Nazi, Tana M. Luger, Daniel J. Amante, Bridget M. Smith, Anna Barker, Stephanie L. Shimada, Julie E. Volkman, Lynn Garvin, Steven R. Simon, Thomas K. Houston

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Patient access to clinical information represents a means to improve the transparency and delivery of health care as well as interactions between patients and health care providers. We examine the movement toward augmenting patient access to clinical information using technology. Our analysis focuses on "Blue Button," a tool that many health care organizations are implementing as part of their Web-based patient portals. Objective: We present a framework for evaluating the effects that technology-assisted access to clinical information may have on stakeholder experiences, processes of care, and health outcomes. Methods: A case study of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) efforts to make increasing amounts of clinical information available to patients through Blue Button. Drawing on established collaborative relationships with researchers, clinicians, and operational partners who are engaged in the VA's ongoing implementation and evaluation efforts related to Blue Button, we assessed existing evidence and organizational practices through key informant interviews, review of documents and other available materials, and an environmental scan of published literature and the websites of other health care organizations. Results: Technology-assisted access to clinical information represents a significant advance for VA patients and marks a significant change for the VA as an organization. Evaluations of Blue Button should (1) consider both processes of care and outcomes, (2) clearly define constructs of focus, (3) examine influencing factors related to the patient population and clinical context, and (4) identify potential unintended consequences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e18
JournalJournal of medical Internet research
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Access to Information
Technology
Delivery of Health Care
Organizations
Veterans
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Health Personnel
Patient Care
Research Personnel
Interviews
Population

Keywords

  • Patient access to records
  • Personal health record
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Technology-assisted patient access to clinical information : An evaluation framework for blue button. / Hogan, Timothy P.; Nazi, Kim M.; Luger, Tana M.; Amante, Daniel J.; Smith, Bridget M.; Barker, Anna; Shimada, Stephanie L.; Volkman, Julie E.; Garvin, Lynn; Simon, Steven R.; Houston, Thomas K.

In: Journal of medical Internet research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 03.2014, p. e18.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hogan, TP, Nazi, KM, Luger, TM, Amante, DJ, Smith, BM, Barker, A, Shimada, SL, Volkman, JE, Garvin, L, Simon, SR & Houston, TK 2014, 'Technology-assisted patient access to clinical information: An evaluation framework for blue button', Journal of medical Internet research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. e18. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.3290
Hogan, Timothy P. ; Nazi, Kim M. ; Luger, Tana M. ; Amante, Daniel J. ; Smith, Bridget M. ; Barker, Anna ; Shimada, Stephanie L. ; Volkman, Julie E. ; Garvin, Lynn ; Simon, Steven R. ; Houston, Thomas K. / Technology-assisted patient access to clinical information : An evaluation framework for blue button. In: Journal of medical Internet research. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. e18.
@article{d1e2b5b92eeb44ada8e21e83ae733b24,
title = "Technology-assisted patient access to clinical information: An evaluation framework for blue button",
abstract = "Background: Patient access to clinical information represents a means to improve the transparency and delivery of health care as well as interactions between patients and health care providers. We examine the movement toward augmenting patient access to clinical information using technology. Our analysis focuses on {"}Blue Button,{"} a tool that many health care organizations are implementing as part of their Web-based patient portals. Objective: We present a framework for evaluating the effects that technology-assisted access to clinical information may have on stakeholder experiences, processes of care, and health outcomes. Methods: A case study of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) efforts to make increasing amounts of clinical information available to patients through Blue Button. Drawing on established collaborative relationships with researchers, clinicians, and operational partners who are engaged in the VA's ongoing implementation and evaluation efforts related to Blue Button, we assessed existing evidence and organizational practices through key informant interviews, review of documents and other available materials, and an environmental scan of published literature and the websites of other health care organizations. Results: Technology-assisted access to clinical information represents a significant advance for VA patients and marks a significant change for the VA as an organization. Evaluations of Blue Button should (1) consider both processes of care and outcomes, (2) clearly define constructs of focus, (3) examine influencing factors related to the patient population and clinical context, and (4) identify potential unintended consequences.",
keywords = "Patient access to records, Personal health record, United States Department of Veterans Affairs",
author = "Hogan, {Timothy P.} and Nazi, {Kim M.} and Luger, {Tana M.} and Amante, {Daniel J.} and Smith, {Bridget M.} and Anna Barker and Shimada, {Stephanie L.} and Volkman, {Julie E.} and Lynn Garvin and Simon, {Steven R.} and Houston, {Thomas K.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.2196/resprot.3290",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "e18",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology-assisted patient access to clinical information

T2 - An evaluation framework for blue button

AU - Hogan, Timothy P.

AU - Nazi, Kim M.

AU - Luger, Tana M.

AU - Amante, Daniel J.

AU - Smith, Bridget M.

AU - Barker, Anna

AU - Shimada, Stephanie L.

AU - Volkman, Julie E.

AU - Garvin, Lynn

AU - Simon, Steven R.

AU - Houston, Thomas K.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Background: Patient access to clinical information represents a means to improve the transparency and delivery of health care as well as interactions between patients and health care providers. We examine the movement toward augmenting patient access to clinical information using technology. Our analysis focuses on "Blue Button," a tool that many health care organizations are implementing as part of their Web-based patient portals. Objective: We present a framework for evaluating the effects that technology-assisted access to clinical information may have on stakeholder experiences, processes of care, and health outcomes. Methods: A case study of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) efforts to make increasing amounts of clinical information available to patients through Blue Button. Drawing on established collaborative relationships with researchers, clinicians, and operational partners who are engaged in the VA's ongoing implementation and evaluation efforts related to Blue Button, we assessed existing evidence and organizational practices through key informant interviews, review of documents and other available materials, and an environmental scan of published literature and the websites of other health care organizations. Results: Technology-assisted access to clinical information represents a significant advance for VA patients and marks a significant change for the VA as an organization. Evaluations of Blue Button should (1) consider both processes of care and outcomes, (2) clearly define constructs of focus, (3) examine influencing factors related to the patient population and clinical context, and (4) identify potential unintended consequences.

AB - Background: Patient access to clinical information represents a means to improve the transparency and delivery of health care as well as interactions between patients and health care providers. We examine the movement toward augmenting patient access to clinical information using technology. Our analysis focuses on "Blue Button," a tool that many health care organizations are implementing as part of their Web-based patient portals. Objective: We present a framework for evaluating the effects that technology-assisted access to clinical information may have on stakeholder experiences, processes of care, and health outcomes. Methods: A case study of the United States Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) efforts to make increasing amounts of clinical information available to patients through Blue Button. Drawing on established collaborative relationships with researchers, clinicians, and operational partners who are engaged in the VA's ongoing implementation and evaluation efforts related to Blue Button, we assessed existing evidence and organizational practices through key informant interviews, review of documents and other available materials, and an environmental scan of published literature and the websites of other health care organizations. Results: Technology-assisted access to clinical information represents a significant advance for VA patients and marks a significant change for the VA as an organization. Evaluations of Blue Button should (1) consider both processes of care and outcomes, (2) clearly define constructs of focus, (3) examine influencing factors related to the patient population and clinical context, and (4) identify potential unintended consequences.

KW - Patient access to records

KW - Personal health record

KW - United States Department of Veterans Affairs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897391633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897391633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/resprot.3290

DO - 10.2196/resprot.3290

M3 - Article

C2 - 24675395

AN - SCOPUS:84897391633

VL - 16

SP - e18

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 3

ER -