Teleradiology in urology: Comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi

Denis C. O'Sullivan, Timothy D. Averch, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, Robert G. Moore, Nicholas Beser, Craig Breitenbach, Ron Khazan, Louis R. Kavoussi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Teleradiology systems are now being evaluated as a mechanism to provide rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnostic radiographs to off- site physicians. Little data are available on the role and safety of teleradiology in urology. To address these issues a personal computer based system was developed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and ease of use of transmitted digital images when evaluating for urinary calculi: Materials and Methods: A total of 100 plain abdominal scout films from excretory urograms performed during acute urological referrals was digitized on a laser scanner. The 10 megabyte files were transferred over public telephone lines and written to compact disks. The images were viewed on a 1280 x 1640 resolution monitor using 'Imager-3D' set, ware run on a 133 MHz. pentium personal computer with 32 megabytes of random access memory. Two faculty urologists and 2 urology fellows each looked at 50 original radiographs and 50 digital images. Diagnostic interpretations of the presence and location of calculi were recorded, and confidence in the diagnosis, assessment of image quality and diagnostic difficulty were scored using a numerical scale. Results: The accuracy for all readers was 86.5% for plain radiographs and 81.5% for digital images (p >0.2). There was no statistical difference between faculty and fellows. Diagnostic accuracy did not differ between plain films and screen images when the results were assessed with respect to image quality, diagnostic difficulty or the reader confidence in the diagnosis (p >0.1). Compared to plain films, more screen images were classified as lower image quality (60 versus 40%) and the diagnostic confidence was lower (low and medium grade 50 versus 35%), although this did not interfere with diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: These data imply that a high quality affordable teleradiology system is effective and accurate compared to plain films for assessing urinary calculi.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2216-2220
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume158
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1997

Fingerprint

Teleradiology
Urinary Calculi
X-Ray Film
Urology
Motion Pictures
Microcomputers
Urography
Computer Systems
Calculi
Telephone
Lasers
Referral and Consultation
Physicians
Safety
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Diagnostic imaging
  • Radiography
  • Radiology
  • Urinary calculi

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Teleradiology in urology : Comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi. / O'Sullivan, Denis C.; Averch, Timothy D.; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A; Moore, Robert G.; Beser, Nicholas; Breitenbach, Craig; Khazan, Ron; Kavoussi, Louis R.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 158, No. 6, 12.1997, p. 2216-2220.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Sullivan, DC, Averch, TD, Cadeddu, JA, Moore, RG, Beser, N, Breitenbach, C, Khazan, R & Kavoussi, LR 1997, 'Teleradiology in urology: Comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi', Journal of Urology, vol. 158, no. 6, pp. 2216-2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68202-8
O'Sullivan, Denis C. ; Averch, Timothy D. ; Cadeddu, Jeffrey A ; Moore, Robert G. ; Beser, Nicholas ; Breitenbach, Craig ; Khazan, Ron ; Kavoussi, Louis R. / Teleradiology in urology : Comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi. In: Journal of Urology. 1997 ; Vol. 158, No. 6. pp. 2216-2220.
@article{4bdc1e02793a414e9fa22b96f9e7a2a0,
title = "Teleradiology in urology: Comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi",
abstract = "Purpose: Teleradiology systems are now being evaluated as a mechanism to provide rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnostic radiographs to off- site physicians. Little data are available on the role and safety of teleradiology in urology. To address these issues a personal computer based system was developed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and ease of use of transmitted digital images when evaluating for urinary calculi: Materials and Methods: A total of 100 plain abdominal scout films from excretory urograms performed during acute urological referrals was digitized on a laser scanner. The 10 megabyte files were transferred over public telephone lines and written to compact disks. The images were viewed on a 1280 x 1640 resolution monitor using 'Imager-3D' set, ware run on a 133 MHz. pentium personal computer with 32 megabytes of random access memory. Two faculty urologists and 2 urology fellows each looked at 50 original radiographs and 50 digital images. Diagnostic interpretations of the presence and location of calculi were recorded, and confidence in the diagnosis, assessment of image quality and diagnostic difficulty were scored using a numerical scale. Results: The accuracy for all readers was 86.5{\%} for plain radiographs and 81.5{\%} for digital images (p >0.2). There was no statistical difference between faculty and fellows. Diagnostic accuracy did not differ between plain films and screen images when the results were assessed with respect to image quality, diagnostic difficulty or the reader confidence in the diagnosis (p >0.1). Compared to plain films, more screen images were classified as lower image quality (60 versus 40{\%}) and the diagnostic confidence was lower (low and medium grade 50 versus 35{\%}), although this did not interfere with diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: These data imply that a high quality affordable teleradiology system is effective and accurate compared to plain films for assessing urinary calculi.",
keywords = "Diagnostic imaging, Radiography, Radiology, Urinary calculi",
author = "O'Sullivan, {Denis C.} and Averch, {Timothy D.} and Cadeddu, {Jeffrey A} and Moore, {Robert G.} and Nicholas Beser and Craig Breitenbach and Ron Khazan and Kavoussi, {Louis R.}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68202-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "158",
pages = "2216--2220",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Teleradiology in urology

T2 - Comparison of digital image quality with original radiographic films to detect urinary calculi

AU - O'Sullivan, Denis C.

AU - Averch, Timothy D.

AU - Cadeddu, Jeffrey A

AU - Moore, Robert G.

AU - Beser, Nicholas

AU - Breitenbach, Craig

AU - Khazan, Ron

AU - Kavoussi, Louis R.

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - Purpose: Teleradiology systems are now being evaluated as a mechanism to provide rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnostic radiographs to off- site physicians. Little data are available on the role and safety of teleradiology in urology. To address these issues a personal computer based system was developed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and ease of use of transmitted digital images when evaluating for urinary calculi: Materials and Methods: A total of 100 plain abdominal scout films from excretory urograms performed during acute urological referrals was digitized on a laser scanner. The 10 megabyte files were transferred over public telephone lines and written to compact disks. The images were viewed on a 1280 x 1640 resolution monitor using 'Imager-3D' set, ware run on a 133 MHz. pentium personal computer with 32 megabytes of random access memory. Two faculty urologists and 2 urology fellows each looked at 50 original radiographs and 50 digital images. Diagnostic interpretations of the presence and location of calculi were recorded, and confidence in the diagnosis, assessment of image quality and diagnostic difficulty were scored using a numerical scale. Results: The accuracy for all readers was 86.5% for plain radiographs and 81.5% for digital images (p >0.2). There was no statistical difference between faculty and fellows. Diagnostic accuracy did not differ between plain films and screen images when the results were assessed with respect to image quality, diagnostic difficulty or the reader confidence in the diagnosis (p >0.1). Compared to plain films, more screen images were classified as lower image quality (60 versus 40%) and the diagnostic confidence was lower (low and medium grade 50 versus 35%), although this did not interfere with diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: These data imply that a high quality affordable teleradiology system is effective and accurate compared to plain films for assessing urinary calculi.

AB - Purpose: Teleradiology systems are now being evaluated as a mechanism to provide rapid, accurate and cost-effective diagnostic radiographs to off- site physicians. Little data are available on the role and safety of teleradiology in urology. To address these issues a personal computer based system was developed to assess the diagnostic accuracy and ease of use of transmitted digital images when evaluating for urinary calculi: Materials and Methods: A total of 100 plain abdominal scout films from excretory urograms performed during acute urological referrals was digitized on a laser scanner. The 10 megabyte files were transferred over public telephone lines and written to compact disks. The images were viewed on a 1280 x 1640 resolution monitor using 'Imager-3D' set, ware run on a 133 MHz. pentium personal computer with 32 megabytes of random access memory. Two faculty urologists and 2 urology fellows each looked at 50 original radiographs and 50 digital images. Diagnostic interpretations of the presence and location of calculi were recorded, and confidence in the diagnosis, assessment of image quality and diagnostic difficulty were scored using a numerical scale. Results: The accuracy for all readers was 86.5% for plain radiographs and 81.5% for digital images (p >0.2). There was no statistical difference between faculty and fellows. Diagnostic accuracy did not differ between plain films and screen images when the results were assessed with respect to image quality, diagnostic difficulty or the reader confidence in the diagnosis (p >0.1). Compared to plain films, more screen images were classified as lower image quality (60 versus 40%) and the diagnostic confidence was lower (low and medium grade 50 versus 35%), although this did not interfere with diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: These data imply that a high quality affordable teleradiology system is effective and accurate compared to plain films for assessing urinary calculi.

KW - Diagnostic imaging

KW - Radiography

KW - Radiology

KW - Urinary calculi

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030727836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030727836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68202-8

DO - 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68202-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 9366347

AN - SCOPUS:0030727836

VL - 158

SP - 2216

EP - 2220

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 6

ER -